AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01304
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. His FA dated 15 Mar 12 reflects a total score of 74.00, which was recorded as “Unsatisfactory.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicant’s military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01307
If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify DFAS—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death. However, should the applicant provide a notarized statement from the deceased former member’s widow relinquishing her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01308
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-JBJE/CL states the applicant’s retired pay account was incorrectly established on 27 Jan 2005 after she submitted the DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel. Since the original election date of the SBP is her retirement date, if it is the intention of the Board to provide a refund of all SBP premiums withheld from 1 Feb 2005, the Board's recommendation must state this; otherwise, by law,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01309
The deceased former member believed his three youngest children were beneficiaries of his SBP due to the fact that he elected spouse and child coverage. Subsequently, the applicant and the deceased member had three children, but there is no evidence the deceased advised DFAS-CL of the birth of these three children. The member’s failure to properly advise DFAS-CL of the children’s birth does not negate their eligibility as contingent SBP beneficiaries.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01310
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his established retirement date as defined in Public Law No. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01310 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01311
At that time, the applicant elected to not participate in the program by choosing Option A, “Decline to make an election until age 60” effective 3 August 2006. The DPTT complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01320
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR states the Board needs to consider the merits of the applicant’s request for upgrade of the MSM to BSM. As of this date, this office has not received a response. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01323
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends that the Board direct a change in the applicant’s RE code to 3K “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the AFBCMR when no other reenlistment code applies or is appropriate.” DPSOA states the applicant received an Article 15 on 23 Dec 04, and was assigned an RE code of 4H based on serving a suspended punishment that expired 22 Jun 05. At the time of his separation he was not eligible to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01324
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, noting there was no official documentation provided or located verifying the applicant participated in aerial flight operations. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01327
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01327 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for award of the AFEM and the AFOR. DPSID states after a thorough review of the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01331
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01331 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find no evidence which indicates that the applicant’s service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01337
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility timely documentation; however, due to the fact the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01338
We note AFPC/DPSIAR’s comment concerning the child’s initial diagnosis and current marital status, however, we believe the evidence submitted by the applicant to this Board is sufficient to establish the applicant’s child, born 1 Dec 86, was incapable of self-support prior to age 18. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the deceased former member be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01342
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01342 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with retirement points based on his mandatory separation date (MSD) of 31 Jan 13. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his MSD waiver package, and the disapproval document from Secretary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01347
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should have been “exempt” from performing the sit-up portion of the FA test. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01349
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application arecontained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of theAir Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence showing she did not receive counseling onthe transfer of Post-9/11 education benefits. Any member of the ArmedForces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01351
DPSIDAR states that there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the absence of a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, they recommend the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary, effective 11 January 2005. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01353
____ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge be corrected to reflect his combat service. His combat service record is more important than much of the information provided in his record.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01355
Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01359
DPSOE states the application has not been filed within the three- year time limitation imposed by AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). Due to the passage of time and lack of promotion history files, DPSOE is unable to determine why the applicant was promoted to his various ranks on the dates reflected in his record. However, the total time-in-grade required to be considered for promotion from E-1 to E-4 was 30 months, and the applicant was promoted at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01361
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at exhibit B. 2 THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did notdemonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; thatthe application was denied without a personal appearance; andthat the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not consideredwith this application. The following members of the Board considered this application inExecutive Session on 5 Feb...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01366
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, the application is not supported with evidence that the applicant was a victim of an error or injustice. After a 2 thorough review of the evidence of record, we do not find persuasive evidence that his Post 911 GI Bill Transfer of educational benefits date is in error. While the applicant believes he was not properly briefed on the requirements to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01373
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Jul 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her FA dated 2 Dec 2009 and 22 Feb 2010, be removed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01382
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01382 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Florida to Minnesota. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01383
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01383 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 22-month extension of his enlistment contract entered on 31 May 11, be cancelled and his original date of separation (DOS) be restored. DPSOA states AFI 26-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, paragraph 6.12.4 allows members to request cancellation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01386
Their response, dated 30 March 2012, provided the eligibility requirements for award of the KSM. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 June 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01393
The applicant’s complete response w/attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ disagrees with 5 of the Air Force offices of THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant’s contentions that her contested EPR does not accurately reflect a true account of her performance and enforcement of standards, that her rater gave her deceptive feedback, and that a rating markdown in Section III, block 2, of the EPR was in reprisal for her involvement in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01396
1 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B thru C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to substitute his contested PRF with the revised PRF. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01398
He feels his medical conditions were responsible for his impaired testing ability and duty performance during the 11E7 testing cycle. On 12 Jan 12, the applicant was granted a waiver of the “No Show” for his WAPS testing by the BCMR and provided supplemental promotion consideration for the 10E7 promotion cycle; however, he was non-selected for promotion. The applicant did not inform anyone that he felt physically unable to test prior to or during his testing.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01399
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has attempted to submit his TEB Statement of Understanding (SOU) since 11 Jan 11. DPSIT states the notes in RNT seem to indicate the applicant never attempted to follow through with signing the SOU. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01401
She notes that the period of desertion to his family has exceeded that required time by law to equate to legal desertion. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial stating there is no evidence of an error or injustice and there is no basis in law to provide relief in this case. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01402
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-01402 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: APPLICANT, be corrected to show that ten (10) days of leave were restored to his current leave account prior to his retirement. The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01411
Specifically, they asked for copies of AF Form 422, AF Form 109, and AF Form 469 or a memorandum from her primary care manager stating what her exemption should have been at that time; however, she failed to provide the requested documents. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12 for review and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01423
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01423 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: XXXXXXX ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For this action he received an Article 15, dated 16 Sep 1991. On 7 Feb 1992, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01424
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 Jul 12 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jul 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01425
DPSIPV states that according to 10 USC, section 2126 the applicant will not be given active duty credit on his DD Form 214 because time spent in USUHS is not counted in determining eligibility towards retirement. In addition, Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, defines EAD for the purpose of determining service dates as duty on the ADL of an armed service for 90 days or more. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01429
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01429 in Executive Session on 30 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01434
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01434 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01436
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. DPSID states after a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record and provided documentation, they verified award of the GWOT-S, GWOT-E, KDSM, and the Air Force Expeditionary Service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01438
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include his character of service, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01439
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01439 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, Personality Disorder, be changed in order that she may reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She desires her record be changed so that she can apply...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01441
Upon reentering the military in the BSC, she was initially awarded two full years of credit without specifying which dates were the dates for which she received the educational credit. Per USC Title 10, “A period of time shall be counted only once when computing constructive service credit.” To prevent awarding service credit for the same period of time for her commissioned military service time and time spent earning her MPH degree, DPAFM2 must subtract her two years of educational credit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01457
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He attempted to transfer his benefits to both of his sons before he retired. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01458
He was precluded byhigh-year tenure rules from remaining on active duty toqualify for the program to transfer education benefits tohis dependents. The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this applicationare contained in the letter prepared by the appropriateoffice of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidenceof an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01460
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. DPSIM states on 9 May 12 a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation, specifically, the member’s signed FA score sheet and a letter from the FAC indicating that he informed them he was injured while completing the FA and was seeking medical attention afterwards. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01461
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The cardio portion of his fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 13 December 2011 be reflected as exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial, however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01462
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Although he elected to retire prior to the effective date totransfer education benefits to his dependents under Post 9/11 GIBill he would like the opportunity to transfer his remainingbenefits to his son. The applicant has not provided anyevidence of an error or injustice by the Air Force. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.