AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01411
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her Fitness Assessments dated 6 Jul 11 and 27 Sep 11 be
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
2. The fitness portion of her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR),
closing 17 Oct 11, be changed from “does not meet” to “exempt”.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She should not have been tested on all components of the FA test
because she was waiting for her AF Form 422, Notification of Air
Force Member’s Qualification Status, to be accomplished.
Her AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 26 May 11
reflects she was exempt from performing push-ups, burpees, high
impact, and jumping. The Health and Wellness Center (HAWC)
failed to generate the AF Form 422. She experienced the same
symptoms when she reported to take her FA test on 27 Sep 11;
however, she could not get an appointment until the next day.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal
statement, a letter of support from her commander, excerpts from
her medical records, a copy of her AF Form 469, a copy of her AF
Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), and a copy
of her fitness package.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
airman first class.
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows:
SCORE
UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
DATE
22 Dec 10
22 Mar 11
* 6 Jul 11
* 27 Sep 11
31 Jan 12
*Contested FA score.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are at Exhibit B and C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removing the FAs from her records
and states the applicant was sent a request asking for additional
documentation. Specifically, they asked for copies of AF Form
422, AF Form 109, and AF Form 469 or a memorandum from her
primary care manager stating what her exemption should have been
at that time; however, she failed to provide the requested
documents.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of changing the fitness portion of
her EPR and states that the applicant has not sufficiently proven
any relevant need to change her rating from “Does Not Meet” to
“Exempt” as reflected on her EPR, nor has she submitted the
requested documents or a letter from her commander to show an
injustice regarding the contested evaluation.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 28 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
2
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is
in error or unjust. The statement from the applicant’s commander
is noted; however, in the absence of corroborative medical
evidence, i.e., AF Form 422, AF Form 109, AF Form 469 or a
memorandum from her primary care manager stating what her
exemption should have been at that time of the contested FAs, we
find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record.
However, should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be
willing to reconsider his request. Further, based on the
foregoing and in the absence of any evidence the contested report
is an inaccurate assessment of her assessment of her performance,
we are not persuaded it is in error or unjust. Therefore, in
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01411 in Executive Session on 18 Dec 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01411:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Apr 12, w/atchs.
3
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 27 Jun 12.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 11 Aug 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12.
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04301
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to have her 17 October 2011 FA removed from AFFMS. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 May 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00053
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for removal of the contested FAs. The applicant has failed to provide any information from the rating officials on the contested report. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00053 in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04609
Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) scores be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicants request to have her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments removed from the Air Force Fitness...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05042
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the AFBCMR approve the applicants request to void the contested report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01534
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends updating the push-up component of the applicants fitness assessment to reflect exempt in AFFMS; which would change her overall composite score to 88.33 (Satisfactory). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the applicants request to remove her contested EPR. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02951
The applicant provided documentation validating her medical condition including; an AF FM 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; an AF FM 422 Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status; a medical evaluation letter signed by her medical provider; and her Enlisted Performance Evaluation (EPR) with a close-out date of 1 Apr 13, which indicates she Meets the fitness standard at the close-out of her report. The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00061
In support of her requests, the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 910; AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; DD Form 2870, Authorization for Disclosure of Medical or Dental Information; Standard Forms (SF) 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care; AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, MEB final disposition and other documentation associated with her request. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00804
The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 31 January 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02474
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 10 Apr 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID states based on the recommendation from DPSIM to only exempt the cardio portion of the applicants FA test and not remove the entire 10 Apr 12 FA, they recommend the AFBCMR deny the applicants request to void the contested EPR. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...