AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01434
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 5C, which denotes “Air Force Reserve
Ineligible, Failure to Meet Fitness Standards” be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His RE code is for a member who is ineligible to reenlist due to
weight management. He has always been within weight standards,
and while deployed for five months; a physical readiness test
was never conducted.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. The RE code of 5C reported on the
applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct as supported by the AF Form
910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt) rendered during
the period 1 Dec 08 thru 30 Nov 10 and AF IMTs 1411, Extension
or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air
Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 12 Sep 10 and 15 May 11. Each
form notes the applicant’s failure to meet fitness standards.
Given such, and since the applicant did not provide any
documentation to substantiate an error was made, there is no
basis for correction.
The complete A1K evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 19 Jun 12 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
careful consideration of the circumstances of this case, we are
not persuaded the applicant's reentry code is in error or
unjust. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of the above
and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01434 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Mar 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 4 Jun 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12.
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01434 was considered:
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04760
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 22 Jun 10 through 18 Nov 10, be removed from his records and replaced with an existing Letter of Evaluation (LOE) for the same period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02002
Subsequently, it was determined the former content of AFI 2503, Administrative Demotion of Airman, and AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion Program, dated 6 Aug 02, would continue to be used as the procedural guidance to implement the AFR Enlisted Demotion and Promotion Policy. We took note of the applicant’s arguments regarding the validity of the demotion instructions ,however, we agree with AFRC/A1K recommendation that the use of the former AFI 36-2503 and Air 36-2502 as the procedural guidance...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2008-02939
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K defers to the appropriate office in regards to the applicant’s request for a medical retirement. His left knee injury was recorded as occurring “while in college.” He received periodic non-flying medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02026
According the AF Form 1411, dated 5 Aug 2012, the applicant requested a 6 month extension for the purpose of Reenlistment (Security Clearance). On 5 Aug 12, his commander recommended approval. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02026 in Executive Session on 4 Mar 14 and 14 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00566
His date of rank (DOR) and effective date of promotion is 1 December 2011. Upon completing the Article 15 punishment action, the applicant became eligible for promotion the following day to the rank of Airman, (E-2). Based on documentation, (AF Form 3070A), provided, the request to adjust the applicant’s promotion eligibility date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) meets the basic requirements for correction of his promotion history to 23 June 2011 versus 1 July 2011, his requested date.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02623
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02623 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her pay date, date of rank and dates of service be corrected. The years of service and pay dates reflected in her records are also incorrect. In accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service and Dates of Rank, when computing the date of rank at enlistment for...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01117
Prior to departing for his deployment in Jan 2011, the applicant was on the extension which provided sufficient retainability for his deployment. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's Air Force records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00106
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. AFRC/A1K states after reviewing the documentation provided by the applicant he has failed to provide a completed AF IMT 348 with a recommendation and signature from the appointing authority; an AF IMT...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00301
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00301 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her promotion effective date (PED) to the grade of airman (E-2) be changed to 21 Mar 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05059
She had a break in service from 4 Nov 10 until 14 Jan 11, at which time she reenlisted in the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicants correct...