AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05590
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05590 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOR) Long Tour. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05598
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05598 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. He applied for the benefit; however, his eligibility was not approved until after his retirement date of 1 September 2009. Given the circumstance that his eligibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05625
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 December 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Title 38 of the United States Code mandates a service member to complete six years of satisfactory service and the member must also agree to serve four additional years in the Selected Reserve when transferring benefits to their dependents. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05638
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05638 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 September 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). DPSIM states there is not enough evidence to indicate whether or not the counter provided the incorrect number of sit-ups during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05643
AFBCMR BC-2012-05643 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05651
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05651 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, Item 24, Foreign and/or Sea Service, be changed from 2 months and 28 days to 6 months and 10 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05663
That would have happened had he had a proper military physical. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05698
AFBCMR BC-2012-05698 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05700
He has attached his contract that states only the Secretary of the Air Force or his designees may excuse his obligation to serve on active duty for the period specified in this agreement. On 9 February 2005, the Secretary of the Air Force ordered that he be separated from the Air Force with an honorable discharge. Accordingly, we find no compelling basis upon which to relieve the applicant of his obligation to reimburse the government for his education...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05711
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05711 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05712
The applicant was discharged from active duty on 1 September 2007 and assigned to the Obligated Reserve Section until 10 May 2009. While assigned to the NNRPS, he was considered for, but not selected by, the CY11 and CY12 non-participating Reserve major selection promotion boards. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05718
The commander denied the applicants request not to demote him; the applicant was notified of this action on 25 Jun 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE does not provide a recommendation. However, they note the applicant was notified by his commander of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05719
If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. While in this case the applicants medical condition was validated by a military medical provider, there is no evidence the commander invalidated the assessment. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 15 November 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05737
Subsequent to 19 Dec 86, all Air Force members who completed Air Force accession training regardless of when the training was completed are authorized the ribbon. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05756
He served honorably throughout his time in the service. He received two LORs and two Article 15s for his actions. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He requests a personal hearing before the Board at his own personal expense because he truly feels that an injustice has been done by not upgrading his discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05789
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05789 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05790
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05790 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to include the following: 1. DPAPP states a review of his master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05799
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial; however, it is recommended that the cardio component of the FA be updated to reflect exempt. The applicant took his FA on 15 February 2012, scoring a composite score of 65, unsatisfactory. We took note of the recommendation of the office of primary responsibility to exempt the applicant from the cardio component of the contested FA and agree the record should be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05802
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05802 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant provided a signed certificate for the MSM dated 17 October 2011 that appears to be authentic; however, no Special Order was provided or could be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05806
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05806 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-EM). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05809
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05809 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant also stated his desire to leave the military due to increased anxiety and stress at home. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05843
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. DPSID was unable to verify that any units in which the applicant served were awarded the PUC, rendering the applicant ineligible for the award. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05852
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05852 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1993B and 1994A Major Line Central Selection Boards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05889
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 July 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05906
After a thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record they were unable to verify the applicant served with a unit that received award of the PUC. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 February 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). The applicants contentions...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed from 6U (Air National Guard (ANG) Not Selected for Retention by the Commander) to 6A (ANG Eligible to Reenlist/Extend Selected by...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05972
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTTER OF DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05972 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05977
According to the memorandum from Air Forces Central Command dated 29 October 2009, the applicants recommendation for the Air Force Combat Action Medal was disapproved. The applicant was afforded a one- time reconsideration so long as the applicants reconsideration request was placed into official channels within one year of the original disapproval date of 29 October 2009. However, should after exhausting his administrative avenue of relief, the applicant feel he is still a victim of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2013-00714
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00714 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service be upgraded to Honorable. In support of his request the applicant provided a personal statement. Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the discharge authority...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | bc 2012 01218
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of a letter from her civilian medical provider, extracts from her medical records, AF Form 356, and other various documents in support of her application. On 29 Apr 11, the IPEB reviewed the applicants case, found her unfit and recommended she be removed from the TDRL and discharged with severance pay with a compensable disability rating of 10 percent for chronic law back pain in accordance with the Veterans...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | bc-2012-04048
Her Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 25 Feb 10, be removed from her records. After careful review, they determined the evidence presents only a minor discrepancy which had no bearing on the administrative action itself. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...