AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01337
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive military pay for the period 16 Dec 11 through
11 Jan 12, and the pay for that period of service reflect on his
Leave and Earning Statement (LES).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was unfairly denied convalescent leave during the period in
question because approval of his request for leave was delayed
due his commander being on leave after returning from
deployment. AFMOA requested he complete convalescent leave
prior to their processing Medical Continuation (MEDCON) Orders
for him. However, his leave request was delayed causing him to
convalesce in civilian status during this period.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of
amended orders, a set of orders, and two AF Forms 988, Leave
Request/Authorization.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served as a Technical Sergeant (TSgt) in the Air
Force Reserve during the matter under review.
On 31 Dec 10, the applicant mobilized and deployed to Iraq on
active duty orders between the period 29 Nov 10 through 5 Aug
11.
On 17 Jan 11, the applicant was medically evacuated from Iraq to
Landstuhl, Germany due to persistent chest pain, and returned to
CONUS on 30 Jan 11.
On 27 Oct 11, an Informal Line of Duty Determination found his
medical condition to be in the line-of-duty.
On 15 Dec 11, the applicant was released from active duty.
In accordance with AFI 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for
Retention, Retirement, and Separation, Reserve Component members
who incur or aggravate an injury, illness or disease in the LOD
while on orders for more than 30 days are not involuntarily
released from those orders until final disposition of their
disability case (condition is materially resolved or referred
for processing into the Disability Evaluation System (DES)).
On 12 Jan 12, the applicant was placed on Convalescent Leave
from the period 12 Jan 12 through 11 Mar 12 through use of two
separate 30-day convalescent leave requests.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. IAW AFI 36-2254, Reserve Personnel
Participation, Reservists must meet dress and appearance
standards, fitness currency, and medical standards to
participate in a pay or points gaining activity. Table 2.1 of
the AFI 26-2254 lists various types of training members in the
selected reserve can perform for pay and points. This training
must be approved in advance by the Commander or appointed
designee. The applicant has not provided any supporting
documentation, such as an AF Form 40A, Record of Individual In
active Duty Training, or an AF Form 938 Request and
Authorization for Active Duty Training/Active Duty Tour, to
substantiate he was in a military status from 16 Dec 11 through
11 Jan 12. Thus, due to lack of supporting documentation the
Command’s basis for a disapproval recommendation has been
established.
A complete copy of the ARPC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 6 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
2
(OPR)
indicating
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicant claims he should have received military pay for the
period 16 Dec 11 through 11 Jan 12. After a thorough review of
the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission,
we believe a preponderance of evidence supports his claim. In
this respect, we note the applicant became ill while on active
duty orders for 31 days or more. On 27 Oct 11, an Informal Line
of Duty Determination (ILOD) determined his medical condition
was in the line-of-duty, yet, for whatever reason, he was
released from active duty on 15 Dec 11, only to be returned to
active duty on 12 Jan 12 for the purpose of convalescent leave.
We note the comments of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility
timely
documentation; however, due to the fact the applicant was placed
back into convalescent leave status on 12 Jan 12, we believe
there is a reasonable basis to conclude that his line of duty
condition had not been resolved and therefore should not have
been released from active duty. Therefore, to preclude the
possibility of an injustice, we believe it appropriate to
resolve any doubt in the applicant’s favor and recommend his
records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on
15 December 2011 he was not released from active duty, but on
that date he continued to serve on active duty for the purposes
of medical continuation until he was released from active duty
on 11 March 2012.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01337 in Executive Session on 13 Dec 12, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
the
lack
of
3
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Mar 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 10 Jul 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 12.
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05366
Air Force members must meet the medical standards and applicable Reserve medical guidance to be considered medically qualified to participate in any pay or point gaining activity In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2254, Volume 1, Reserve Personnel Participation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639
There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicants request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01466
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's case file reflects that she was denied a participation waiver by the AFRC/SG staff for the period of time in question. While the form is not signed, the Air Force Reserve Surgeon General (AFRC/SG) notes that the applicant was submitted for a participation waiver; however, her request was denied. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02769
In support of his request, the applicant provides a statement from counsel and copies of excerpts of his military personnel records and civilian and service medical records pertaining to his LOD Determination, Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), and subsequent permanent retirement for physical disability. The applicant contends that his 2004 LOD injury rendered him unfit to perform his duties and, thus, he should have been retained on active duty until he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01227
It is unclear why no medical documentation was provided or why the case was not completed. In this case, he is not eligible for active duty orders. We note that the Air Force offices of primary responsibility state the applicants medical condition was not found to be in the line of duty; therefore no eligibility for active duty orders or pay exists.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00106
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. AFRC/A1K states after reviewing the documentation provided by the applicant he has failed to provide a completed AF IMT 348 with a recommendation and signature from the appointing authority; an AF IMT...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01337 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the FY05 Air Force Reserve Line and Nonline Colonel Promotion Selection Board. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03938
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the Air Force Reserve and was on active duty orders from 13 Oct 09 to 9 Jun 10. The supporting Reserve Medical Unit (RMU) was not notified of this until Apr 10; therefore, no LOD determination or profile action was taken prior her being placed on long term orders. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00126
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00126 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive active duty orders for the period 1 Oct through 5 Dec 11. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGHI recommends approval...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2008-02939
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K defers to the appropriate office in regards to the applicant’s request for a medical retirement. His left knee injury was recorded as occurring “while in college.” He received periodic non-flying medical...