Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01382
Original file (BC-2012-01382.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01382 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
 
   
 
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Home  of  Record  (HOR)  be  changed  from      Florida  to   
Minnesota. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His family moved from Florida to Minnesota. 
 
The  applicant  provides  no  documentation  in  support  of  his 
request. 
 
His complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
________________________________________________________________
__ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  contracted  his  initial  enlistment  in  the  Regular 
Air 
4/1, 
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, reflects XXXXX, Florida as his 
HOR. 
 
Joint  Federal  Travel  Regulation  (JFTR)  Volume  I,  Appendix  A, 
states  in  part  that  a  HOR  is  the  place  recorded  as  the 
individual’s  home  when  commissioned,  appointed,  enlisted, 
inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty.  Any correction 
must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the 
member’s  actual  home  upon  entering  the  Service,  and  not  a 
different place selected for the member's convenience. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIPE  recommends  denial.    DPSIPE  states  the  applicant’s 
records  reflect  XXXXXX,  Florida  as  the  city/state  in  which  he 
lived prior to entering the Air Force.  His request is based on 
a  personal  move  and  does  not  warrant  a  change  of  military 
records. 
 

Sep 

2002. 

Form 

Force 

on 

6 

 

His 

DD 

 

 

 

 

The  complete  DPSIPE  evaluation,  with  attachment,  is  at  Exhibit 
C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 
________________________________________________________________
__ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________
__ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________
__ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  in  Docket  Number 
BC-2012-01382  in  Executive  Session  on  4  Oct  2012,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
     
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

 
 
 

     
     
 

 
 
 

 

 
2

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01382: 
 
   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Mar 2012. 
   Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 5 May 2012, w/atch. 
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012. 
 
 
 
 
                                     
                                   Panel Chair 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03867

    Original file (BC 2012 03867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524

    Original file (BC 2011 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his military records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037

    Original file (BC-2012-04037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298

    Original file (BC-2012-04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to Navarre, Florida. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01990

    Original file (BC-2012-01990.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01990 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Hawaii. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05855

    Original file (BC 2012 05855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05855 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed from Hope, IN to Columbia, SC. According to the applicant’s DD Form 4/1,Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, Hope, IN was her home of record at the time of her enlistment. We took...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05855

    Original file (BC 2012 05855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05855 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed from Hope, IN to Columbia, SC. According to the applicant’s DD Form 4/1,Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, Hope, IN was her home of record at the time of her enlistment. We took...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02411

    Original file (BC-2011-02411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02411 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Boynton Beach, Florida to Dallas, Texas. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00522

    Original file (BC 2013 00522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After reviewing the documentation presented and the applicant’s military personnel record, there is no evidence to warrant changing the applicant’s HOR. The applicant argues that his home of record (HOR), as...