Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01310
Original file (BC-2012-01310.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01310 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He  be  able  to  transfer  his  Post  9/11  GI  Bill  educational 
benefits to his dependents. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was not aware nor did he transfer his benefits prior to his 
Reserve  retirement.    He  would  like  an  opportunity  to  complete 
this transfer. 
 
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 12 Jan 12, the applicant transferred to the Retired Reserve.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did 
not  transfer  his  benefits  to  his    dependents  prior  to  his 
established  retirement  date  as  defined  in  Public  Law  No.  110-
252.   
 
Post 9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33, became effective 1 Aug 09 based 
on Post 9/11 Veterans Education Assistance Act of 2008.  It is 
the result of Public Law No. 110-252 signed by the President on 
30 Jun 08.  Section 3319 (f)(1} which states in part, that "an 
individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a 
member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed."  As 
early  as  Apr  09,  Veterans  Affairs,  Air  Force  and  Air  Force 
Reserve Components, and in fact all services, published articles 
in  service  related  newsletters  and  web  sites  explaining  the 
program benefits and requirements. 
 

(PM), 

Base 

Individual 

Mobilization 

On  23  Jul  09,  Air  Force  published  Air  Force  Instruction  36-
2306_AFGMI, Air Force Guidance Memorandum-Post 9/11 GI Bill.  In 
accordance  with  that  guidance,  Air  Force  Reserve  Command 
implemented  a  communication  plan  that  employed  the  Air  Reserve 
Personnel  Center  and  unit  education  and  training  offices  to 
convey  program  information  locally  in  briefings  as  well  as 
articles in service related newsletters and multiple web sites. 
By  mid  Jun  09  unit  education  and  training  offices  were  trained 
via a Webinar session and received flyers to ensure as complete 
exposure as possible.  Information was made available to Program 
Managers 
Augmentee 
Administrator  (BIMAA)  and  Readiness  Management  Group.    In 
addition,  the  Air  Force  Reserve  Commander  sent  an  email  to  all 
Reserve  members  in  Nov  09.    This  email  explained  the 
requirements and the need to transfer benefits while a member of 
the  Selected  Reserve.    The  note  further  provided  contact 
information for the Air Reserve Personnel Center should a member 
need additional assistance.  A statement explaining the need to 
transfer  benefits  prior  to  retirement  was  added  to  the  Virtual 
Personnel  Center-Guard  Reserve  (vPC-GR)  retirement  checklist  in 
Jul 10. 
 
This communication plan was carefully implemented because there 
is  no  provision  in  the  law  or  DoD  policy  for  a  waiver  if  a 
member  retires  without  transferring  the  benefits.    The 
opportunity  to  transfer  is  not  an  entitlement  and  is  in  fact 
intended as a retention tool in exchange for additional service. 
Every effort was made, even before the program became available 
to convey information to eligible members. 
 
The complete ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 8 May 12 for review and response.  As of this date, 
no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 

 

2 

 

rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-01310  in  Executive  Session  on  13  November  2012,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Apr 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 7 May 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 May 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04575

    Original file (BC-2011-04575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTT recommends denial of his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. DPTT states that although the applicant would have been otherwise eligible for the benefit per the “Verification of Member’s Active Duty Service”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04352

    Original file (BC-2011-04352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    110-252, for the first time in history, service members were able to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to their dependents. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 Sep 10, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04355

    Original file (BC-2011-04355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02411

    Original file (BC-2012-02411.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The services failed to inform its members who were approaching retirement of the requirement to be on active duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00764

    Original file (BC 2014 00764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 19 Dec 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01546

    Original file (BC-2012-01546.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Public Law states in part, that “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” Further, the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) implemented a communication plan that employed ARPC and unit education and training offices to convey the program information. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04096

    Original file (BC-2011-04096.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04096 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03120

    Original file (BC 2013 03120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The mechanism for transferring Post- 9/11 GI Bill benefits has been available since 29 June 2009 but, by law, the member is required to be active duty or selected reserve on the date the request to transfer is initiated. Based on the facts provided, the applicant is not eligible to transfer his benefits to his dependents as defined in Public Law No. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00274

    Original file (BC-2012-00274.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial noting that under AFI 36-3212 and in accordance with 10 USC 61, a condition must be found “in line of duty,” service-incurred, or permanently aggravated by military service in order to qualify as a compensable disorder. As for the applicant’s request to correct his record to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits, other than his own...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00585

    Original file (BC 2014 00585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00585 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...