Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01429
Original file (BC-2012-01429.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01429 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
    
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  DD  Form  214,  Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of 
Transfer  or  Discharge,  be  corrected  to  reflect  his  foreign 
service in Vietnam. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was in Ton Sun Nuit AB, Saigon, on two different occasions in 
a temporary duty status from Taiwan.  He went to Vietnam after 
his  son  was  born  in  May  of  1972,  which  was  prior  to  being 
stationed at Clark AB, Philippines, in late 1973. 
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  a  personal 
statement. 
 
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant was assigned to Taiwan from 15 Jun 70 to 25 Jul 71.  
He was also assigned to the Philippines from 29 Mar 73 to 11 Mar 
74. 
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    After  a  thorough  review  of  the 
applicant’s  records,  they  were  able  to  verify  that  he  was 
assigned in Taiwan from 15 Jun 70 through 25 Jul 71 and in the 
Philippines from 29 Mar 73 through 11 Mar 74.  However, there is 
no  mention  of  any  TDY  to  Vietnam  anywhere  in  his  records.  
Therefore,  his  foreign  service  is  correct  as  reflected  on  his 
DD Form 214. 
 
 

 
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 25 Jun 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission  of  newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01429 in Executive Session on 30 Aug 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

2 

 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 12, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 15 Jun 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jun 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 

 

3 

 

 

 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03966

    Original file (BC-2011-03966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service to Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00372

    Original file (BC-2011-00372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP was able to verify the following overseas service and his DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect 25 days of Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00373 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02752

    Original file (BC 2014 02752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02752 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following medals be listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty: Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with One Bronze Service Star (Administratively Corrected); Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM). The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00580

    Original file (BC 2014 00580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for awards in support of Operation NICKEL GRASS. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00665

    Original file (BC-2011-00665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00665 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFPC has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for his service with the 303rd MMS, Kunsan AB, Korea, as well as entitlement to the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) for his honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067

    Original file (BC-2011-03067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00709

    Original file (BC-2011-00709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The time he spent in Vietnam is not recorded accurately. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00163

    Original file (BC-2010-00163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect the appropriate awards and foreign service time. Only members of the armed forces of the United States who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...