Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01351
Original file (BC-2012-01351.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01351 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: YES 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
 
      
     
  
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
Her  ex-spouse’s  record  be  corrected  to  show  he  elected  “former 
spouse” coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Her  ex-husband  kept  her  as  the  SBP  beneficiary  after  their 
divorce, as reflected by his hand-written note on his 2 January 
2002  Retiree  Account  Statement  (RAS)  upon  which  her  date  of 
birth,  monthly  SBP  premium  and  annuity  amount  are  shown, 
confirming  the  decedent  intended  for  her  to  be  his  SBP 
beneficiary.   
 
In  support  of  her  appeal,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  her 
late husband’s Certificate of Death, their Divorce Decree, an SBP 
Election change, and their Certificate of Marriage.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  decedent  is  a  former  member  of  the  Regular  Air  Force  who 
retired effective 1 August 1962 in the grade of major (O-4).   
 
The remaining relevant facts are contained in the letter prepared 
by  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  (OPR)  at 
Exhibit B.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
ARPC/DPSIAR recommends approval.  DPSIAR states that it appears 
the decedent was previously married, and then retired effective 
1 August  1962.    He  declined  SBP  coverage  during  the  Plan’s 

 

1 

initial  open  enrollment.    The  Defense  Enrollment  Eligibility 
Reporting  System  (DEERS)  reflects  the  applicant  and  the  member 
married on 8 April 1982, and the member elected spouse and child 
coverage  based  on  full  retired  pay  during  the  one-year  open 
enrollment  (1  October  1981  to  30  September  1982)  authorized  by 
Public  Law  97-35  (13  August  1981).    The  parties  divorced  on 
10 October  2005,  and  the  qualified  domestic  relations  order, 
incorporated by the divorce decree, awarded SBP to the applicant.  
There is no evidence either party submitted an election to change 
spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year 
following  their  divorce.    The  information  maintained  in  the 
retired  pay  system  reflected  the  applicant’s  date  of  birth 
(15 June  1936)  as  the  eligible  spouse  beneficiary.    Monthly 
premiums continued to be deducted from the member’s retired pay 
until  his  death  on  1  November  2011.    There  is  no  indication 
either party remarried.   
 
DPSIDAR states that there is no evidence of Air Force error in 
this case; however, in the absence of a competing claimant and to 
prevent  a  possible  injustice,  they  recommend  the  decedent’s 
record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage 
based on full retired pay, naming APPLICANT as the former spouse 
beneficiary,  effective  11  January  2005.    Approval  should  be 
contingent upon recovery of appropriate retroactive costs.   
 
The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 19 June 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence in this case, we are persuaded 
it  was  the  applicant’s  intent  to  provide  his  ex-spouse  with  an 
SBP  annuity.    In  this  respect,  we  note  the  decedent  elected 
spouse  and  child  coverage  based  on  full  retired  pay  during  the 
SBP  open  season  enrollment  authorized  by  Public  Law  97-35.  

 

2

Although the decedent and applicant divorced on 10 October 2005, 
the qualified domestic order, incorporated by the divorce decree, 
awarded SBP to the applicant.  We believe that since SBP premiums 
continued to be deducted from the member’s retired pay until his 
death  on  1  November  2011  it  would  be  an  injustice  for  the 
applicant to be denied the SBP benefits.  Therefore, we recommend 
the member’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the DECEASED FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that 
on  11  January  2006,  he  elected  former  spouse  coverage  based  on 
full  retired  pay  under  the  Survivor  Benefit  Program,  naming 
APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01351  in  Executive  Session  on  27  November  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  record  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-
01351 was considered: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Aug 10, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 22 May 12. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12. 

  
Panel Chair 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02598

    Original file (BC-2012-02598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02598

    Original file (BC 2012 02598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, absent a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02752

    Original file (BC-2012-02752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the member’s records should be corrected to reflect that he made a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02752

    Original file (BC 2012 02752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The member did not request coverage for his former spouse be terminated and the fact that SBP premiums were deducted from his retired pay for over three years following their divorce are indicative of his intent to maintain the applicant as the eligible SBP beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02043

    Original file (BC 2012 02043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: While married, the member elected spouse and child coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay under the SBP prior to his 1 Jun 73 retirement. There is no record of marriage at the time of his death. While counsel argues the former member never married; the evidence of record, specifically, the death certificate states otherwise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01857

    Original file (BC-2012-01857.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication the member submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage before 21 May 2005, as required by law. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the interest of justice, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to show he elected SBP former spouse only coverage based on full retired pay effective 22 May 2004, naming his former spouse as the eligible former spouse beneficiary. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062

    Original file (BC-2011-00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicant’s coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04295

    Original file (BC-2010-04295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be entitled to benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR did not provide a recommendation. The complete AFRBA Legal Advisor...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00454

    Original file (BC-2012-00454.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To comply with federal law, AFAFC established spouse coverage based on full retired pay under the SBP, updated the applicant’s date of birth as the eligible spouse beneficiary and began deducting premiums from the service member’s retired pay. The DPSIAR complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. The Board has been advised that it can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is evidence that the member or former spouse timely notified...