Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01323
Original file (BC-2012-01323.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01323 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  reentry  (RE)  code  of  4H  which  denotes  “Serving  suspended 
punishment  pursuant  to  Article  15,  Uniform  Code  of  Military 
Justice” be corrected to allow him reentry into the military. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  was  not  commanded  to  leave  the  Air  Force.    He  chose  to 
separate at the end of his enlistment, and was never informed of 
any reentry problems during his out-processing briefings. 
 
He did not know what the reentry code meant and saw the honorable 
discharge and assumed everything was okay.   
 
It was not until he decided to join the Air National Guard that 
he realized there was a problem with his RE code. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD  Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 22 Aug 00, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. 
 
On 23 Dec 04, the applicant received an Article 15 for violating 
a  lawful  general  regulation  by  wrongfully  transmitting  sexually 
explicit images via his government email account.  His punishment 
consisted  of  a  suspended  reduction  to  the  grade  of  airman  first 
class  through  22  Jun  05,  a  forfeiture  of  $500.00  pay  per  month 
for two months, and a restriction to the limits of the base for 
45 days. 

 On 9 Nov 05, the applicant completed AF Form 31, Airman’s Request 
for  Early  Separation/Separation  Based  on  Change  in  Service 
Obligation, with a requested date of separation of 23 May 06, and 
his commander approved his request. 

 
On 23 May 06, the applicant was honorably discharged and received 
an RE code of 4H.  He served on active duty for a period of five 
years, nine months, and two days.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSOA  recommends  that  the  Board  direct  a  change  in  the 
applicant’s  RE  code  to  3K  “Reserved  for  use  by  HQ  AFPC  or  the 
AFBCMR  when  no  other  reenlistment  code  applies  or  is 
appropriate.” 
 
DPSOA states the applicant received an Article 15 on 23 Dec 04, 
and was assigned an RE code of 4H based on serving a suspended 
punishment that expired 22 Jun 05.  At the time of his separation 
he  was  not  eligible  to  reenlist  because  his  RE  code  was  “4H.”  
The  applicant’s  commander  never  selected  or  non-selected  the 
applicant for reenlistment, which would have changed his RE code.   
 
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 11 May 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date,  a  response  has  not  been  received  by  this  office  (Exhibit 
D). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    After 
reviewing  the  applicant’s  request  and  noting  the  opinion  and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR),  we  believe  a  measure  of  relief  is  warranted.    In  this 
respect, AFPC/DPSOA has pointed out that the applicant’s RE code 
at  the  time  of  separation  was  incorrect  since  his  suspended 
punishment pursuant to an Article 15 had expired on 22 Jun 05.  
Also,  because  of  the  incorrect  RE  code  the  applicant  was  not 
considered  for  reenlistment  under  the  Selective  Reenlistment 
Program.    Therefore,  we  agree  with  the  Air  Force  OPR  that  the 
applicant’s RE code should be changed to 3K.  Our recommendation 
 
 

2

in  no  way  guarantees  that  he  will  be  allowed  to  return  to  any 
branch  of  the  service  and  any  such  entrance  will  be  contingent 
upon needs of the service for which he applies.  In view of the 
above, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was discharge 
on 23 May 06 with a reentry code of “3K” rather than “4H.” 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01323 in Executive Session on 5 Sep 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 Panel Chair 
 Member 
 Member 

 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 12, w/atch. 
     Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 3 May 12. 
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 12. 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 

 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04610

    Original file (BC-2011-04610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04610 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of “3K” “Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR” be changed to “1J” Eligible to Reenlist – Elected Separation or Discharge. His separation date was 22 July 2009 and there was not enough time, between the date of the remitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02705

    Original file (BC-2005-02705.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02705 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Jun 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be changed so that he may enlist in the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02557

    Original file (BC-2011-02557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02654

    Original file (BC-2011-02654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 3K, due to the RE code 4H being erroneous. The applicant is requesting his RE code and SPD code be changed to allow him to reenlist in military service. However, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00339

    Original file (BC-2010-00339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    JAJM states the applicant was not serving on a suspended punishment to the Article 15 on his date of separation of 21 January 2006. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code will be administratively changed to “3K.” This RE code is the most appropriate code at this time; however, he will still require a waiver to reenter the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03831

    Original file (BC-2008-03831.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03731 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code be changed to one that would allow him to reenlist into the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received non-judicial punishment (NJP) under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01458

    Original file (BC-2010-01458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01458 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4H (serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenter the Air Force. Since RE code 2C and 4C both applied to the applicant at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02425

    Original file (BC 2014 02425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00067

    Original file (BC-2010-00067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While serving in the Air Force he had all but one “5” Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs). He received $10,314.00 in separation pay and received a “2X” RE Code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01779

    Original file (BC 2014 01779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01779 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “3K” (Reserved for use by AFPC or the AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate) be changed to “1M”, “1P” or “1Q” to allow reentry into the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the...