Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01353
Original file (BC-2012-01353.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
____ 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01353 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
1.  His  WD  AGO  Form  53-55,  Enlisted  Record  and  Report  of 
Separation  –  Honorable  Discharge  be  corrected  to  reflect  his 
combat service.  
 
2.  His  record  be  corrected  to  reflect  entitlement  to  the  Air 
Medal (AM) (will be administratively corrected).  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 His discharge papers were filed away many years ago and he did 
not  notice  the  error  until  he  began  making  plans  to  obtain  a 
gravestone.    His  combat  service  record  is  more  important  than 
much of the information provided in his record.  
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
WD  AGO  Form  53-55,  Honorable  Discharge  certificate,  a  letter 
from his congressman and General Order 512.  
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 18 Jun 12, AFPC/DPSIDR notified the applicant they were able 
to  verify  his  entitlement  to  the  AM  per  General  Order  512, 
Headquarters, 3rd Air Division, dated 18 Mar 45.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    DPAPP  states  a  review  of  the 
applicant’s Master Personnel Records and documentation submitted 
failed to substantiate Foreign Service in combat.  
 
 
 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  22  Aug  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days 
(Exhibit  D).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  not  received  a 
response.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice  to  add  combat 
service to his DD Form 214.  We took notice of the applicant’s 
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we  agree  with  the  opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis  for  our  conclusion  the  applicant  has  not  been  the  victim 
of an error or injustice.  In addition, AFPC/DPSIDR verified the 
applicant’s  entitlement  to  the  AM  and  will  administratively 
correct his record to reflect this award.  Therefore, aside from 
this  administrative  correction,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend 
granting further relief in this case.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

  
 
 
 
 

 
 

2

 
 
 

  
  
  

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  Docket  Number    
BC-2012-01353  in  Executive  Session  on  5  Nov  12,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
Panel Chair 
 
Member 
Member 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Mar 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 8 Jun 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Aug 12. 
 
 
 
 
 

Panel Chair 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04145

    Original file (BC-2008-04145.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04145 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WG AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, issued in conjunction with his honorable discharge on 29 November 1945, reflect his Air Medal that he was previously awarded. The applicant’s WG AGO 53-55...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00108

    Original file (BC-2011-00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 25 May 11, HQ AFPC/DPSOAA states there is no evidence to support the applicant’s deceased grandfather enlisted rather than being inducted under the selective service system which was highly active during WWII. His date of induction is recorded in block 22 as 16 Feb 42, matching his date of entry on active duty recorded in block 24. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02835

    Original file (BC-2007-02835.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02835 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03020

    Original file (BC-2011-03020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the GCM, ACM, and APCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified and administratively corrected the former service member’s record to reflect entitlement to the WWIIVM and AOM- Japan. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00945

    Original file (BC 2013 00945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge; WD-AGO Form 100, Army of the United States Separation Qualification Record, a witness statement from a lieutenant stating that he was stationed in Tinian, Island, Japan with the applicant and various other documents associated with his request. A review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01378

    Original file (BC-2010-01378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by providing copies of his Individual Flight Record (IFR) that reflects “33” versus “29” missions. We find no evidence the applicant was ever recommended for award of the DFC. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01378 in Executive Session on 19 Jan 11,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04566

    Original file (BC-2011-04566.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following awarded decorations be reflected in his record: Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) Air Medal, with Seven Oak Leaf Clusters (AM, w/7OLCs) Good Conduct Medal (GCM) American Campaign Medal (ACM) European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01785

    Original file (BC-2010-01785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Medal (AM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AM, PUC, and PH Medal, indicating there is no evidence of his entitlement to these awards. A thorough review of the applicant’s record revealed no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00003

    Original file (BC-2010-00003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55, filed in his master personnel record, he was awarded the AM w/4 OLC, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal and the Purple Heart. DPSIDR states there are no special order, recommendations, proposed citation, or any other evidence provided by the applicant or located within his official record to support his submission for the award of the DFC and the AM w/5 OLCs based on the number of missions flown. Should the applicant provide further evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05076

    Original file (BC-2011-05076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFPC/DPSIDR will administratively correct the applicant’s AOM to AOM-G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the EAMECM and...