RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01361
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: YES
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with anhonorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed to a waiverable code.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He met the physical standards and requirements for service in theAir Force when he completed Basic Military Training. His AETC
Form 125A, Record of Administrative Training Action, states he
should be considered for reinstatement in the Combat Control
Selection Course (CCSC) at a later date; however, his RE coderenders him ineligible for reenlistment.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DDForm 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty;
his AETC Form 125A, his student training report and CongressionalInquiry.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is atExhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 16 Nov 10, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 2 Mar 11, he was recommended for discharge due to failure topass the CCSC Deployment Operations Team (DOT) 10 and DOT1 physical training evaluations.
On 21 Mar 11, he was issued an entry level separation withuncharacterized service for entry level performance or conduct.
He served six months and two days on active duty.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOE states the applicants REcode is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF,
Chapter 5 and based on his entry level separation with
uncharacterized service. In addition, he has not providedevidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code.
The statement on his AF Form 125A does not entitle him to reenter
the Air Force but allows him to be considered for the CCSC againif he is allowed back in service.
DPSOA notes the RE code 2C can be waived if any recruitingservice feels it appropriate.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicanton 30 May 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existinglaw or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits ofthe case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendationof the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt itsrationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant hasnot been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in theabsence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis torecommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has notbeen shown that a personal appearance with or without counselwill materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
2
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did notdemonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; thatthe application was denied without a personal appearance; andthat the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not consideredwith this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application inExecutive Session on 5 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 362603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC2012-
01361:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 14 May 12.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01380
Examiner’s Note: The Air Force office of primary responsibility has identified the applicant’s correct reentry code should have been 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C &...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00287
The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicants involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicants RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00287
The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicants involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicants RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04885
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02927
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02927 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. Therefore, the applicants request should be denied because the AFI in effect at the time of his separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 2011-04390 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 RE code. Furthermore, everyone who is involuntarily separated from the Air Force with...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00923
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00923 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a RE code 1 series that would allow him to reenlist. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03242
In this case, the applicant indicated his urinary incontinence was exacerbated by over-hydrating during the day and he should be granted a waiver to continue his service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant argues that the only time he should have been prevented from participating in his graduation was during the time he was experiencing...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02075
On 6 Mar 12, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for a mental disorder. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his narrative reason for separation. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit...