AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01138
The Article 15 punishment imposed on her on 27 Apr 09 be removed from her records. The witness statements that formed the basis of the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) action were dated 7 to 14 days after the alleged false official statements were made. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ 3 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Sep 12, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01145
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records reflect he has never been TDY his entire career; however, his AF Form 910, TSgt, SSgt, and Sgt Performance Report during the period 1 Sep 74 through 1 Mar 75 states he was “TDY to a remote location and was commended for doing an outstanding job.” In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of AF Form 910, Chronology of Service Assignments Listing, and a Report of Individual...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01146
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 June 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant’s records do not reflect he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01153
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was a fighter pilot for 13 years before he crashed in Vietnam. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s contentions, and his response to the Air Force evaluation, the Board does not find the evidence submitted sufficient to determine the applicant is the victim of an error or injustice. While the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01156
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01156 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find no evidence which indicates that the applicant’s service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01157
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from 22 Jun 1970 to 30 Nov 1974. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Jun 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01159
On 20 Sep 74, the applicant was furnished a UOTCH discharge and credited with 2 years, 7 months, and 14 days of total active service, which included 79 days of lost time for the period 1 Jul 74 through 20 Sep 74. The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC)...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01160
On 24 May 1972, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with a service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 25 Sep 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2012-01160: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Mar 2012, w/atch. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01162
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01162 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 18 July 2012, the FBI investigation and a request for post- service information were forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01164
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS (KLM-K). Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01164 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to show he was awarded: 1. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicate below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01167
The VSM is awarded to all service members of the U. S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the area of eligibility (AOE). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial noting a review of the service member’s personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01169
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01169 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01172
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR did not provide a recommendation. The applicant provided a signed Decor 6, dated 8 Mar 11, which was more than two years after the closing of the inclusive dates for the recommended award. The recommendation must be made by someone, other than the member himself, preferably the commander or supervisor at the time of the meritorious act, with firsthand knowledge of the member's accomplishments.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01176
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01176 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Taylor, MO to Quincy, IL. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01178
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. On 17 Nov 08, the applicant received pre-separation counseling, and indicated on his DD Form 2648, Preseparation Counseling Checklist...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01179
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment score dated 1 February 2012, be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01182
His five Lines of Duty Determinations (LODs) that were abandoned be processed to completion. Medical continuation orders also require a member to be in the process of a medical board. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application BC-2012-01182 in Executive Session on 14 November 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Panel Chair Member Member 5 Exhibit A....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01190
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01190 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his discharge he met the criteria for a waiver of discharge and had...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01190 OT NEW
However, after a careful review and consideration of all factors involved, the Secretarys designee, in the exercise of his discretionary authority, did not concur with the determination of a majority of the Board and directed that your military records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. Sincerely, Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records Attachments: 1. Director Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01195
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01195 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded. On 27 February 1989 the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge. Additionally, due to the lack of evidence of a successful post- service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01202
He received an erroneous RE code of 4H; his correct RE code is 2B. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, AFPC/DPSOY will publish and provide the applicant with a corrected copy of his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01202 in Executive Session on 21 August 2012 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01204
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01204 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, change from “Entry Level Performance and Conduct” to read “Failure to Make Satisfactory Progress in a Required Training...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01205
On 28 January 2009, the applciant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend her for discharge for mental disorders. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel record, her discharge, to include the character of service, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01208
The complete DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant's implicit contention to supplant his administrative discharge from the Air National Guard with a medical retirement. Section 1207a, which reads: "A disabling condition will be found to be in the LOD, eventhough the condition existed prior to service (EPTS), if the member has at least eight years of active service and the member was on active duty orders specifying a period of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01209
If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 August 1996, he elected former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at the previous reduced level...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01210
The applicant’s commander, by letter dated 14 Mar 12, requests the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score be removed from his records or nullified. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial to remove the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score from the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01217
The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designation (SPD) codeJBK (less than 6 years of active service) with a correspondingnarrative reason for separation of Completion of Required ActiveService because the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ExpirationTerm of Service may be involuntarily accelerated. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, the discharge to include thecharacterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01230
DFAS states that based on Claims, Against the Government, Title 31 United States Code Section 3702(b) (31 USC § 3702(b)), The Barring Act, the applicant was required to submit a claim for the SBP annuity within six years from her deceased spouse’s date of death. _________________________________________________________________ 2 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel states there is no statue or regulation that states DD Form 2656-7 and only this form, is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01231
AFBCMR BC-2012-01231 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his Fitness Assessment (FA) score dated 17 January 2012, be declared void and removed from his records. Attachment: Ltr,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01234
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Further, the Board notes the applicant submitted no evidence to substantiate his claim his final payment was in error with respect to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01238
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01239
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Informal Line of Duty (LOD) Determination, dated 26 April 2006, for his left knee injury be corrected to include his head and neck injury. According to medical documents provided by the applicant, he sustained a left knee injury on 16 March 2006...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01249
On 11 February 2008, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) evaluated the applicant’s case and recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent for post-concussive syndrome with headaches, sleep disturbance and cognitive and memory complaints with a history of four previous concussions under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 8045-9304. Under Title 10, U.S.C., Physical Evaluation Boards must determine if a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01251
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01251 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reduction in rank to technical sergeant (TSgt, E-6) that he received pursuant to a nonjudicial punishment action on 8 Dec 1977 be set aside and his rank be restored to master sergeant (MSgt, E-7). When he returned to his unit he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01253
He requests his discharge be reviewed for upgrade due to this evidence not being considered during his Air Force service. On 30 May 1977, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicant’s service characterization from a bad conduct discharge to general (under honorable conditions). While they were unable to review the record of trial, the applicant alleges no error or injustice in the processing of the special court-martial.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01262
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01262 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be reinstated on the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) promotion list. While the arguments set forth by the applicant are noted, it appears to us the applicant’s commander had a sufficient basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01263
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit B. JFTR paragraph U5012-I further clarifies that an extension must not be authorized for approval for more than six years from the date of separation or release from active duty unless a member’s certified ongoing medical condition prevents relocation of the member for longer than six years from the retirement date. Based on the above, they believe an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01266
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment test, dated 7 January 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He believed the pain was from a pre- existing injury. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01267
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of an Air Force Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, and a note from his PCP indicating no running and rehab, The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01274
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR states based on the applicant’s duties and responsibilities as an aircraft mechanic, his duty location (Okinawa, Japan), and the fact his DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the VSM and RVCM, the likelihood of his having served in direct support of military operations supporting Vietnam is highly likely. This document is not inherently part of Air Force members’ personnel records; therefore, this documentation is not always...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279
However, it does not reflect the entire time he was TDY in Korea. The applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ 3 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012 and 3 Oct 2012, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01281
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. However, we do not find the evidence and documentation provided is sufficient to upgrade it on that basis. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01284
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01284 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s records reflect he served on active duty from 9 Jul 63 to 7 Jul 67. There was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01291
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 12c of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect she was credited with seven years of active service, rather than three. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01296
If the Air Force was to meet the required promotion rate for JSOs, IAW Public Law 99-433, para 662.a.2, an additional 19 JSOs would need to be promoted from the CY11B Col CSB. average average 2 above board (board The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By letter dated 30 Jul 12, the applicant states there are two critical areas in which the two advisory opinions did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01298
During this time the applicant was forced to use 51 days of leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that fifty-one (51) days of leave were restored to his account commencing 2 October 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01300
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in thePost-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PSindicating the applicants squadron did not receive the Post9/11 GI Bill Informational Briefing until after the applicanthad retired, we also note the applicant never out-processedthrough the Retention Office Manager (ROM),...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01301
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for AFBCMR BC-2012-01301 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: APPLICANT, be corrected to show the sit component portion of the fitness assessment, dated 28 February 2012, be and hereby is, amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System. The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01303
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for AFBCMR BC-2012-01303 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: APPLICANT, be corrected to show the abdominal circumference component portion of the fitness assessment, dated 27 January 2012, be and hereby is, amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System. The pertinent military...