Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01401
Original file (BC-2012-01401.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01401 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
    
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
Her  record  be  corrected  to  show  she  declined  Survivor  Benefit 
Plan (SBP) coverage. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Her husband deserted her in January 2003.  She does not know of 
his whereabouts and he has not responded to legal postings.  She 
notes  that  the  period  of  desertion  to  his  family  has  exceeded 
that required time by law to equate to legal desertion.   
 
In  support  of  her  request,  the  applicant  provides  a  personal 
statement and copies of letters of support. 
 
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  Defense  Enrolment  Eligibility  Reporting  System  (DEERS) 
reflects the applicant was married on 25 Aug 70.  
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which are at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial stating there is no evidence of an 
error or injustice and there is no basis in law to provide relief 
in this case.  The applicant has not provided any evidence that 
proves she is no longer married.  Further, she failed to properly 
out-process  prior  to  retiring  despite  the  attempts  made  by  the 
SBP  counselor  to  schedule  her  for  the  required  one-on-one  SBP 
briefing.    If  the  applicant  were  to  get  divorced,  she  should 
provide a certified copy of a divorce decree or annulment to the 

 
 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) office to suspend 
SBP spouse coverage.  
 
The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 19 Jun 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01401 in Executive Session on 19 Dec 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Apr 10, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, APFC/DPSIAR, dated 24 May 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 

 

 

2 

 

 

 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01572

    Original file (BC-2012-01572.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband paid SBP premiums for his former spouse’s SBP coverage from January 1996 to June 2004, even though the former spouse remarried in September 2003 before her 55th birthday. The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, dated 15 Nov 12, Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Dec 12, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01541

    Original file (BC-2012-01541.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIAR requested the applicant provide a certified copy of the final divorce decree and/or the QDRO, which she claimed awarded SBP coverage to her following divorce. In the event the applicant provides the requested documents which prove the court awarded SBP coverage to her, absence a competing claimant and to prevent a possible injustice, they recommend the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming XXXXXXXXXXXXX as the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01544

    Original file (BC-2012-01544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the available evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, it appears the decedent and the applicant were married in Feb 09. Subsequent to the divorce of his first spouse, a deemed election for former spouse coverage was submitted to DFAS and accepted in accordance with the divorce decree and the governing law. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01647

    Original file (BC-2011-01647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither the applicant nor the member made a deemed election for the SBP within a year of the divorce, as required. ___________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR does not provide a recommendation per AFBCMR guidance because it involves two potential SBP beneficiaries. Since the applicant has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances existed that would override the failure to effect the former spouse coverage, based on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01101

    Original file (BC-2012-01101.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to establish former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR indicates that since the request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02043

    Original file (BC 2012 02043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: While married, the member elected spouse and child coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay under the SBP prior to his 1 Jun 73 retirement. There is no record of marriage at the time of his death. While counsel argues the former member never married; the evidence of record, specifically, the death certificate states otherwise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01547

    Original file (BC-2012-01547.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIAR states there is evidence of Air Force error; therefore, they recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to reflect she submitted a valid SBP election for child only coverage based on full retired pay effective 1 Nov 04. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 November 2004, she submitted a valid election for child...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-04704

    Original file (BC-2011-04704.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay, and his wife concurred in his election. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 19 Jan 2012, the applicant requested additional time to provide supplementary evidence in support of her request and her case was administratively closed. In the absence of evidence that there was a “deemed election” by the applicant within one year 3 after the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01917

    Original file (BC-2012-01917.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 Feb 82, the applicant and his former spouse were married, and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his August 96 retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01307

    Original file (BC-2012-01307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify DFAS—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death. However, should the applicant provide a notarized statement from the deceased former member’s widow relinquishing her...