Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01349
Original file (BC-2012-01349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 


IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01349 

COUNSEL: NONE 

HEARING DESIRED: NO 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill educationbenefits to her dependents. 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

She was on terminal leave and was not provided the information ontransferring Post-9/11 education benefits to her dependents. 

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of herDD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from ActiveDuty. 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is atExhibit A. 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

The applicant is a former Regular Air Force member who retired on1 September 2009. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application arecontained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of theAir Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant has not 
provided any evidence showing she did not receive counseling onthe transfer of Post-9/11 education benefits. The applicantindicated on her Pre-separation Counseling checklist that she didnot want any education counseling in regard to Post-9/11benefits. Furthermore, the education office at Scott AFB heldmore than 20 Post-9/11 briefings between January and September2009, and the requirements to transfer benefits were publishedweekly in the base newspaper. 


Under Title 38 United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, servicemembers are allowed to transfer unused educational benefits to 
their dependent spouses and children. Any member of the ArmedForces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted,
on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI 
bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces onthe date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additionalperiod of duty in the Armed Forces from the date of election, maytransfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The Air 
Force, in implementing its guidance, developed a communicationplan that used the Air Force Personnel Center Commander and theEducation and Training Sections at each installation to serve asspokespersons to communicate the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer-todependent 
program using internal media, internal communicationtools, and external trade publications. There were various news 
articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirementto be on duty on the 1 August 2009 effective date of the Post9/
11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. Some articles 
mentioned that service members on active duty or in the selectedreserve could transfer benefits. Notably, since 1 August 2009,
the Air Force approved over 30,000 transferability applications. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the DoD and theMilitary Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI Bill and thetransferability feature. DoD developed a special website, hostedby Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to facilitate the 
transfer of educational benefits. The website system was 
operational on 27 June 2009 for the purpose of accepting transferof benefits applications. The Directive Type Memo (DTM) and AirForce Instruction state the transfer must be made while the 
member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents were 
published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 August 2009,
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is atExhibit B. 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicanton 4 Jun 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existinglaw or regulations. 
2. The application was timely filed. 
2 



3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstratethe existence of an error or injustice. While we note the stepsthe Air Force took to inform eligible personnel of this newbenefit, it appears the applicant was in a terminal leave statuswhen the website system was in operation for the purpose ofaccepting TEB applications. Moreover, while the education staffat Scott AFB may have held more than twenty briefings betweenJanuary and September 2009, as noted in previous similar casesbefore this Board, during this period, there existed greatconfusion concerning the exact requirements for TEB and theprocedures that would be implemented. In view of a totality ofthe evidence before us, we believe the applicant has establishedthat she was not provided sufficient information in order to makea well informed decision concerning TEB. Therefore, we recommendthe records be corrected as indicated below. 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Forcerelating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that she elected totransfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits on 31 August 
2009. 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR DocketNumber BC-2012-01349 in Executive Session on 11 February 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

Acting Panel ChairMember 
Member 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 10 May 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 12. 


 Acting Panel Chair 

3 




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00168

    Original file (BC 2014 00168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request noting the applicant may not have received accurate information regarding transferring education benefits to his dependents. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04281

    Original file (BC-2011-04281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her son. The applicant states she was TDY during this time, but this is not a true statement as noted in her Air Force Automated Education Management System (AFAEMS) records. Any member of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00786

    Original file (BC-2012-00786.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In 2009, he registered for Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits with the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and was led to believe that his Defense Enrollment Eligibility System (DEERS) dependents would be automatically eligible to receive the education benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05073

    Original file (BC-2012-05073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not provided any information on transferring educational benefits to her dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00338

    Original file (BC-2012-00338.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to apply to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents with an effective date of January 2010 to avoid incurring an additional active duty service commitment (ADSC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03776

    Original file (BC-2011-03776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's last day on active duty was 31 Jul 09. The DTM and Air Force Instruction state the transfer must be made while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. While on terminal leave there were opportunities afforded members currently on terminal leave to extend their retirement effective date an additional 30 days in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01541

    Original file (BC-2013-01541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not provide adequate justification or documentation to substantiate approval of his request. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, eligible for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05141

    Original file (BC 2013 05141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05141 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at...