AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03587
However, they do recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to show that the time of his disenrollment he was on conduct probation not academic probation. HQ USAFA/JA opines the applicant was not prejudiced by the error and that the applicant was disenrolled for his Wing Honor Code violations The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel states in his response that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03592
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPW states the Air Force took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time between 1 November 2001 - 31 December 2001 to make an election decision. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-3596 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 May 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Overseas Ribbon (AFOR) and the “Combat Ribbon” [Combat Readiness Medal (CRM)]. Before 6 Jan 86, the ribbon was awarded to members credited...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03600
He served 36 years, 11 months, and 3 days on active duty Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03604 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 JULY 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 24 September 2004, and Unfavorable Information File (UIF) be removed from his records and the Referral Officer Performance Report...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03605
DPPPWB states the application was not filed within the three-year time limitation imposed by AFI 36-2303, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, (AFBCMR) paragraph 3.5, 1 March 1996. DPPPWB states in absence of any documentation to the contrary the assumption is that the applicant was discharged in the correct grade. He resigned from OCS, because he was eligible for discharge based on having 98 points, which is reflected on his honorable discharge certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03606
The specific reasons cited were her apathetic attitude toward her Air Force duties and responsibilities, her continued failure to report to her duty section on time, and her downward duty performance as evidenced by the following: a. She was not recommended for discharge for a medical condition. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 4 Oct 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03608
The bottom-line is whether or not falling off the rung of an aircraft ladder, due to a mis-step, is considered combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Jan 06 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03609
Applicant was discharged with a BCD on 27 Sep 74. Based on his overall record of service, and in view of the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03611
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03611 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 May 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Regarding his request for CRSC compensation, after a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03613
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03613 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 MAY 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date, incurred due to a Permanent Change-of-Station (PCS), be changed from 29 Jun 06 to 31 May 05. He has not provided sufficient justification or...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03616
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 2 April 1973, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of 4 years. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we see no evidence that would warrant his rank be upgraded to airman first class. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03617
On 4 April 2001, the applicant was notified by her commander of her academic release from the NCOA and of the convening of an Academic Review Board. Based on the applicant’s DOR to TSgt, the first time she was considered for promotion to MSgt was cycle 02E7. The applicant was academically released from the NCOA and the CEPME commander denied the appeal.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03621
An additional 30 days of convalescent leave was requested on 18 August 2005, so that he could rehabilitate at his home of record. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03625
However, in the event the applicant provides the required document, an amended death certificate, it would be appropriate to correct the decedent’s records to show the applicant was the eligible spouse beneficiary upon his death. A spouse’s eligibility to receive an SBP annuity terminates upon divorce. However, to date, the applicant has not provided an amended death certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03634
Since the order for this decoration was published on 14 September 2005, the citation could not have been filed in his selection record nor reflected in any of their official personnel data systems when the board convened. The MSM did not exist when the CY05A board convened on 6 July 2005. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03637
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03637 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUN 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. He believes the lost time was inappropriate because he was a sick...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03640
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant’s military record indicates he was assigned to Sembach Air Base, Germany from 1 February 1956 to 7 September 1956 and, Landstuhl, Germany, from 8 September 1956 to 29 December 1958. After reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we find that other than the applicant’s assertions, we have no evidence to indicate his entitlement to any of the requested decorations.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03644
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03644 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: None MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JAN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded. On 28 October 1988, the applicant was again seen in Family Practice for no change in his back pain and prolongation of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03647
On 19 September 1957, his commander requested the applicant appear before a board of officers to determine whether he would be discharged for unfitness. DPPRS states the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at that time and, was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03648
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03648 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Jun 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03651
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03651 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUN 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His non-selections for the FY03 and FY04 Major Special Selection Boards (SSBs) be set aside and that he be allowed to participate in the Air Force Reserve. At the time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03655
ECAF states the applicant retired from active duty on 31 January 1992, and the reason he did not relocate within the one year following termination of active duty was not due to an unexpected event beyond his control, but due to his decision to obtain employment in the local area of his last duty station. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Dec...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03658
On 29 June 2005, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge due to having a mental condition that interfered with military service. He received an RE Code of 4K, which defined means “Medically disqualified for continued service, or the airman is pending evaluation by MEB/PEB.” On 8 December 2005, the Separation Procedures Branch corrected the DD Form 214, from 2005 to reflect the RE Code 2C "Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge" the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03659
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The law provides benefits if an individual separates with less than a full term of service for hardship, service-connected disability, disability existing prior to entering active duty, physical or mental condition that interferes with duty, or reduction in force. Airmen are given entry-level separation uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03661
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a copy of his request to the discharge review board (DRB) to change his discharge to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The RE code and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03662
On 10 April 1986, he reported late for duty and received an LOR. DPPRS concludes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred during the discharge process, and provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service. After careful consideration of the available evidence and in the absence of evidence by the applicant to the contrary, we believe that the actions taken to effect his discharge were proper and in compliance with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03663
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03663 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. Applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force on 11 June 2003, in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of General Court- Martial...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03668
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03668 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 JUNE 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). We...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03671
An evaluation officer reviewed the case on 9 June 1982, found the applicant an unsuitable candidate for rehabilitation, and recommended he be discharged from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support the separation and recommended he be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without probation and rehabilitation. Based on the documentation on file in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03673
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he filed a Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate, SGLV – 8286, on 1 September 2005, declining coverage. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005- 03673 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03677
The Personnel Data System (PDS) reflects the applicant failed to get retainability for PCS or TDY by the remarks code 80 which reflects the servicemember failed to get retainability for PCS or TDY. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 April 2006, for review and response. He was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03679
DPM states the applicant voluntarily did not complete his term of enlistment; therefore, SRB termination and recoupment is mandatory. The DPPRSR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He feels he is due the SRB money for his EAD time in the Reserve and while on his AGR tour because he has continued to serve in the 1C6XX career field. Even though he is in the Air Force Reserve, he is still...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03688
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-03688 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03690
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2005-03690 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Ms. Josephine L. Davis, and Ms. Kathleen F. Graham,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03694
His intention was to complete enough time to retire from the military and receive full benefits. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Data extracted from documentation provided by the applicant indicates on 28 Feb 95, he was assigned to the Retired Reserve (Honorary), not eligible for retired pay at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03695
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03695 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jun 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Unsuitability be removed from his DD Form 214 as the reason for his discharge from the Air Force. They note that based on the documentation on file in the master...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03698
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03698 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 JUN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial indicating that the PH is...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03701
INDEX CODE: 135.02 BC-2005-03701 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03702
The Medical Consultant states the applicant was disability separated with severance pay due to chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome that significantly interfered with performance of military duties despite prolonged restrictions of activity and duty, and appropriate medical care including rest, medication, and physical therapy. The applicant submits a June 2005 medical statement stating he is medically cleared to participate in activity associated with military service in support of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03706
INDEX CODE: 111.05 BC-2005-03706 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03707
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03707 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) dated 19 March 1998 or later be removed from his records. AFPC/DPPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03713
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03713 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JUN 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), a campaign ribbon and credit for service in Turkey from Apr 74...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03714
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge reflects the applicant was discharged on 31 October 1958, in the grade of AB with an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge, in accordance with Air Force Regulation 39-17 for unfitness. Applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) in 5 February 1979 to have his undesirable discharge upgraded to honorable. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03716
The commander advised the applicant of his right to board action and if he desired to make an application for discharge in lieu of board action. On 9 November 1955, the applicant was notified to appear before a board of officers to hear evidence and to make recommendations as to his retention in the Air Force. On 15 November 1955, the board of officers convened and recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force for unfitness and that he receive an undesirable discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03718
Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination dated 22 May 1973 reflects the applicant received a head injury and laceration in Vietnam due to a bomb explosion in 1972. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. Novel, Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03721
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Jan 06 for review and comment within 30 days. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03727
On 14 May 04, the servicemember was informed by the Air Force that they were unable to find evidence of a recommendation for, or award of, the BSM in his records. The timeline for submitting decorations is two years from the date of the act or achievement. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jan 06, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03728
INDEX CODE 131.01 AFBCMR BC-2005-03728 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03730
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was honorably discharged and never had any faults and although her time on active duty was short, she served it with honor. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2006, for...