AF | BCMR | CY2006 | -BC-2006-02594
INDEX CODE: 137.02 AFBCMR BC-2006-02594 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | 2006-02698
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02698 in Executive Session on 20 December...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 00086 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00086 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and rationale for the earlier decision by the board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit G. On 5 Mar 14, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 00500
His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 02824
On 23 December 1975, the applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge upgraded. They further recommend if the Board determines the applicant is requesting an upgrade of his discharge, then his records should be corrected to upgrade his discharge to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 03623 3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03623 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ REQUESTED ACTION: The former service members record be corrected to reflect award of the Silver Star (SS) Medal. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP) is at Exhibit G and the Addendum to ROP is at Exhibit M. By application, dated 9 Apr 12,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC--2006-01920
Regardless of her educational level or the number of college credits at the time of her enlistment, she was not authorized to enlist at a grade higher than E-1. Headquarters AFRC records of bonus listings only go back to 1987; however, there were no bonuses or advanced pay grade for enlistment into critical AFSC’s in 1979 either. RSO states that, based on the information they have reviewed, there is no evidence to award the applicant a higher enlistment grade.
The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff United States Air Force. Copy of Directive cc: DFAS-DE AFBCMR BC-2006-03564 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-06-02045
Based on the limited documentation available for review, the applicant was requested to furnish information concerning the basis for his separation from the Air Force (Exhibit C). Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Jul 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-06-02155
The applicant was advised by letter on 22 August 2006, that in order to complete the change, he would need to provide a statement from the Social Security Administration stating that his SSN was XXXXXXXXXX on his enlistment date. The DPSOMP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Oct 06, for review and comment within 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-06-02466
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02466 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 FEB 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and the narrative reason for separation be changed. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1003-02675-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. In letters, dated 25 September 2002, 17 October 2002, 17 December 2002, 28 August 2003, 25 September 2003, and 27 April 2004, the applicant requested reconsideration of his appeal (Exhibit F). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1981-02400-2
In a letter received on 3 April 1995, counsel requested reconsideration of the application and provided additional documentation, consisting of declarations from Lieutenant General “B”, and Colonels “S” and “K”, indicating the Board’s 1992 decision was erroneous. By letter, dated 15 September 2005, counsel provided a copy of the 12 September 2005 remand order from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia directing the applicant’s request for direct promotion be remanded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1983-03927-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1983-03927-2 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests the narrative reason for separation indicated in Block 28 of his DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty” be changed from...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1986-01756-2
He cites another serviceman who received the MOH for heroic service in attempting to rescue a fellow officer from a flaming aircraft in 1920. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board denied the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01342-2
The AFBCMR Staff assumed the applicant was referring to his most recent case (BC-2004-02624), which was denied on 27 Dec 04, and in a letter dated 3 May 06 (Exhibit K), requested he provide copies of documents he alluded to his 14 Feb 06 submission. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the applicant’s latest submissions, a majority of the Board reconsidered his appeal but found the documentation insufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01879A
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit G. On 30 Nov 05, a copy of the FBI Report was forwarded to the applicant for review and/or comment. We therefore recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Nov 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-01958-2
FIFTH ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1993-01958 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 July 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that on 25 April 2005, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of master sergeant, (E-7), rather than staff sergeant (E-5). On...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-02122B
An accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the original Board’s decision is provided in the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 31 Aug 05, this Board reconsidered and again denied the applicant’s appeal for an honorable discharge and an amended narrative reason, concluding the post-service information he provided was meager and insufficient to overcome his misconduct while in the service and, according to the FBI report,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-06923C
Counsel also notes that several General officers supported the applicant’s request for a higher level endorsement on the OER and stated that the lack of higher endorser support indicated by the OER led to the applicant’s pass over for promotion to major. Counsel considers AFPC/DPPPE’s response fallacious when they indicated that OERs are one aspect of a record to the question of whether the continued presence of the OERs closing in 1986 in the applicant’s record make any difference to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1994-02946
The applicant’s request was considered and denied by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) on 9 February 1995 (see Exhibit E). In order to be eligible for the PH, a member must have been wounded as a direct result of enemy action, and the wound required treatment by medical personnel. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 September 2006, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1995-00665-2
On 3 December 1986, the AFDRB considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. In an application to the Air Force Board for Correction for Military Records (AFBCMR) dated 10 February 1995, the applicant requested his UOTHC discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1996-01804-3
Counsel submitted statements (and other attachments) from senior officers familiar with the applicant’s career who essentially contended the applicant’s record was so strong he would have been promoted if his record had been correct when first considered by the central selection boards. Statements were provided from three individuals (two retired brigadier generals, and a retired colonel), who indicated they were in the applicant’s chain of command and endorsed his direct promotion based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1997-10007-3
In his latest request for reconsideration, the applicant makes arguments similar to those in his earlier appeals and provides the same documents as previously submitted, except for a statement from his former group commander. The ROI also concluded the “Promote” recommendation on the applicant’s CY91A PRF was not an act of reprisal. The applicant’s latest submission still has not overcome the findings of the ROI and the designated senior rater.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-00387-3
___________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 25 August 1998, the AFBCMR considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his BCD to honorable. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through counsel, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01124C
The decision noted the treatment for anxiety in the service and the 22 May 04 opinion of a DVA examination that concluded the applicant suffered from schizophrenia either during his military service or, more likely, in the year following military service in 1976. In a DD Form 149 dated 2 Sep 04, the applicant requested reconsideration, and submitted his 100% DVA rating for service- connected schizophrenia, 24 years after his discharge from the Air Force. The Consultant provided additional...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01144A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-01144 INDEX CODE 106.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his 1998 dishonorable discharge be upgraded to under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge. On 8 Jul 96, the US Air Force Court of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-02164
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-02164 INDEX CODE: 136.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to his Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position with the Pennsylvania Air National Guard (PAANG) and he be promoted to the grade of senior master sergeant (SMSgt). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-02973-2
(See the Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Jan 89, with attachments, at Exhibit G). (See the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings, dated 28 Jan 04, with attachments, at Exhibit H). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-03113-2
AFBCMR BC-1998-03113 INDEX CODE: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1999-03222-2
__________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 15 Jun 00, the AFBCMR considered and denied similar requests as stated above from the applicant. The applicant states he submitted records from his credit union during his Article 15 appeal process. Applicant provides six attachments to his personal statement consisting of letters, dated 9 Sep 04 and 7 Dec 04, sent to his Congressman, redacted, official statements made by principals at the credit union in...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1999-03347
The majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. The applicant’s UOTHC discharge may have been appropriate for the circumstances at the time. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1999-03347 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1999-03347-2
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit F. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We find no impropriety in the characterization...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2000-03359-4
THIRD ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-03359 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of captain effective 1 February 1945, rather than 1 July 1945. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 12 July 2004, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-20005-01498
The fact that he did not report his history of shoulder pain at the time of enlistment could have formed a basis for discharge under the provisions of defective enlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2001-00377A
On 13 Sep 99, the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) Personnel Board recommended the applicant be dismissed from the service, but if he was allowed to retire, it be in the grade of major. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s dismissal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board majority, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H, and the Minority Report at Exhibit G. On 11 Oct 05, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, asking...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2001-01352-2
However, in a letter, dated 18 January 2002, he was advised that his request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board (Exhibit G). Counsel’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that applicant was given fair and equitable consideration for promotion to the Reserve grade of colonel by three separate...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2001-02110
On 27 March 1957, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting upgrade of the applicant’s discharge. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2001-03343
In a DD Form 149 dated 10 Nov 01 (Exhibit A), the applicant requested his DD Form 214 and military records reflect his new name. By letter dated 24 Mar 04, the applicant’s counsel queried the Director of the Air Force Review Boards Agency about changing the applicant’s name on his DD Form 214 (Exhibit A). On 28 Jul 04, HQ ARPC/DPS advised the applicant his DD Form 149 would not be referred to the AFBCMR because his “record” had been administratively changed to reflect his name as M-- D--...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-01061-2
By letter, dated 6 Sep 05, the applicant requests reconsideration of his appeal. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit J. Exhibit M. Letter, applicant, dated 23 Dec 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-01819A
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's request to receive back pay and reinstatement to active duty, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit J. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The report was not forwarded to the applicant because the only entry was the assault...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-01823-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01823-3 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, dated 16 April 2001, be changed to reflect “BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-03011-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03011-2 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code be changed from an RE code of 2C, reenlistment ineligible, to any RE code that begins with the number 1, reenlistment eligible. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-04105-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04105 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his records reflect he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Vietnam from 1 to 17 October 1968. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-00161
Records provided by the applicant reflect that he filed an Inspector General (IG) complaint alleging he was the victim of unfair treatment by his squadron commander in the form of disproportionate punishment by receiving an LOR; denial of promotion to master sergeant; and a referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for mismanagement of the Nutritional Medicine Section. The applicant was notified of his commander’s recommendation and that a general discharge was being recommended. On 3...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-00308-2
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 Aug 03, the Board considered, and by a majority vote, denied a similar appeal submitted by the applicant. In the absence of official documentation showing she was diagnosed with scoliosis while serving on active duty we find no error in this case and are not persuaded by her contentions that she has been the victim of an injustice. Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Aug 03, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-00940
Examiner’s Note: Applicant’s case file was originally submitted on 10 Mar 03, and at her counsel’s request was temporarily withdrawn on 30 Jun 03. The HQ AFRC/DPZ complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By DD Form 149, dated 5 Oct 05, and by letter, through counsel, dated 3 Nov 05, she reiterated her original contentions that the discharge board was improperly instructed regarding...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02214-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02214 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded, his narrative reason for separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority,” his separation code be changed, and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2B” to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02287A
In support of the applicant’s case, counsel provides an overview of the applicant’s case, a discussion of the methods of measuring ejection fraction and responds to the additional evaluation prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel responded to the additional Air Force evaluation in the evidence submitted with...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02518
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02518 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 MAY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) medal. A summary of the evidence considered by the Board and the rationale for its...