Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03679
Original file (BC-2005-03679.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03679
                                       INDEX CODE:  128.05
      XXXXXXXXXXXXX                     COUNSEL: NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXX                            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  4 June 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Recoupment action of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus  (SRB)  be  terminated
and he continue to receive the unpaid portions of the bonus.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is due the SRB money that has already been paid and that  is  still  owed
due to his extended active duty time in the SRB career field.

In support of his application, the applicant submits copies of his  extended
active duty (EAD) tour orders while serving as a traditional  Reservist  and
his  Active  Guard  Reserve  (AGR)   orders.    The   applicant’s   complete
submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 February 1991, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at  the
age of 20 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of six years.   He
was progressively promoted to the grade of technical sergeant effective  and
with a date of rank of 1 June 2003.

On 11 January 1999, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for  a
period of six years in the 1C6XX career  field  (Space  Systems  Operations)
entitling him to an SRB in the amount of $38,743.19.  On 1  April  2004,  he
was voluntarily released from  active  duty  under  the  provisions  of  the
PALACE CHASE program to serve in the Air Reserve Component  for  double  his
unfulfilled term of his enlistment.  He incurred a debt for  SRB  recoupment
in the amount of $4,962.31 for the  unserved  portion  of  his  active  duty
reenlistment.

The applicant served several voluntarily tours of  EAD  while  serving  with
the Air Force Reserve.  On 15 October 2005, he was voluntarily  recalled  to
EAD on a 4-year AGR tour.  His projected date of separation  is  31  October
2009.

As of  9  January  2006,  $2,354.79  has  been  collected  towards  his  SRB
recoupment debt.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial.  DPM states the applicant voluntarily did  not
complete his term of enlistment; therefore, SRB termination  and  recoupment
is mandatory.  In accordance  with  Air  Force  Instruction  (AFI)  36-2606,
“Airmen must remain technically qualified for effective performance  in  the
SRB skill, and  complete  the  full  term  of  enlistment  or  extension  of
enlistment in the SRB skill.  Failure to do so  may  result  in  termination
and recoupment.  SRB termination also requires recoupment of the  percentage
representing the unserved part of the additional  obligated  service.”   The
AFPC/DPPAE evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPPRSR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to  not  repay  his
enlistment bonus.  DPPRSR states in accordance  with  AFI  36-3205,  when  a
member goes Regular PALACE CHASE, they are required to  repay  any  unserved
portion of bonuses.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to retain  his
active duty bonus even though he is now on an EAD Reserve tour.  The  DPPRSR
evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He feels he is due the SRB money for his EAD time in the Reserve  and  while
on his AGR tour because he has  continued  to  serve  in  the  1C6XX  career
field.  Even though he is in the Air Force Reserve, he is still part of  the
United States Air Force performing the  same  duties  as  while  he  was  on
Regular active duty.  The applicant’s rebuttal is at Exhibit F.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error  or  injustice.   The  applicant  requests  recoupment
action of his SRB be terminated  and  to  continue  to  receive  the  unpaid
portions of the bonus because he has continued to serve on EAD in  the  same
career field while  in  the  Reserves.   We  note,  however,  the  applicant
voluntarily terminated his term of enlistment that entitled him to the  SRB;
therefore, SRB termination  and  recoupment  were  mandatory.   We  find  no
evidence  the  applicant  was  miscounseled  or  that  he  was  treated  any
differently from other similarly  situated  members.   Therefore,  we  agree
with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force  offices  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that the applicant has not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.
Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 9 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
            Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
            Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member


The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-2005-03679
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Nov 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Dec 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRSR, dated 20 Dec 05.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 05.
      Exhibit F.  Applicant's Rebuttal, dated 12 Jan 06.




                                  CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02958

    Original file (BC-2005-02958.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02958 INDEX CODE: 128.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 28 JANUARY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be relieved from her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) debt. On 21 January 2005, she enlisted in the Air Force Reserve PALACE FRONT program for one year. DPPRS concludes the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01871

    Original file (BC-2005-01871.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy a personal statement, copies of AF Forms 1288 (Application for Ready Reserve Assignment) and a 29 June 2004 letter requesting a date of separation under PALACE CHASE. DPPRSR states the applicant’s AF Form 1288, dated 30 March 2004, is dated after the Force Shaping Phase I program ended. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01871 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02810

    Original file (BC-2004-02810.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02810 INDEX CODE 128.10 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A pro-rated portion (approximately $666.67) of his original enlistment bonus be refunded. Information about PALACE CHASE is provided with the applicant’s military personnel records at Exhibit B. Recommend disapproval of his request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00790

    Original file (BC-2005-00790.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested a PALACE CHASE transfer from active duty approximately 9 August 2004 and enlisted in the National Guard on 5 January 2005 as outlined in the Force Shaping guidelines. Even though the evidence does not establish that the actions taken by Air Force officials were improper at the time of the applicant’s PALACE CHASE application, we find it difficult to believe the applicant would not have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01971

    Original file (BC-2006-01971.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He transferred into Palace chase and is performing the exact Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) that he performed for more than six years while on active duty. He served 3 years, 6 months and 27 days in the regular Air Force. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802344

    Original file (9802344.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be released from his PALACE CHASE contract and resignation from the Air Force. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement and other documentation Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, PALACE CHASE, HQ AFPC/DPPRSR, reviewed this application and states that applicant denies knowledge of recoupment action prior to separation; however, on 8 May 1997, he signed a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01898

    Original file (BC-2006-01898.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01898 INDEX CODE: 128.05 BRIAN J. HIPOL COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 December 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Recoupment of his unearned Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. Since the applicant separated before completing the time agreed to serve, recoupment was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01788

    Original file (BC-2003-01788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His application was processed and approved with a date of separation of 30 October 2002 and a PALACE CHASE contract expiration date of 10 March 2007. The AFPC/DPPRSP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 August 2003 for review and comment (Exhibits D). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04029

    Original file (BC-2007-04029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The recoupment action of his $11,581.56, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. AFI 36-3205, Applying for the Palace Chase and Palace Front Programs, clearly states the member must repay any unearned portion of an enlistment or reenlistment bonus. The master military pay account (MMPA) shows he separated with a SPD code of KGQ which indicates the bonus is to be recouped unless he separated under Force Shaping.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02883

    Original file (BC 2014 02883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-3207, Separating Commissioned Officers, states the Air Force normally requires recoupment of a portion of education assistance, special pay, or bonus money received when officers separate before completing the period of active duty they agreed to serve. Further, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Memorandum, dated 29 Nov 10, directs members with an SPD Code of FGQ (Intradepartmental Transfer) are required to repay the unearned portion of the bonus. THE BOARD...