RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03730
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 MAY 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to allow her active duty wages to be used for
unemployment compensation.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was honorably discharged and never had any faults and although her
time on active duty was short, she served it with honor.
Applicant's complete submission, with an attachment, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 1 June 2004 for
a period of four years as an airman basic (AB).
On 25 February 2005, the applicant reported to the Life Skills Support
Center (LSSC) in crisis for assistance with anxiety and depression.
She received psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for her symptoms. The
applicant’s condition deteriorated during the next three months and
despite ongoing treatment she reported a variety of unexplained
physical symptoms, as well as, continued anxiety and depression.
The applicant underwent voluntary psychological testing and she was
diagnosed with a Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, with
Passive Aggressive Traits and the applicant also met the criteria for
Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Moderate, and Somatization
Disorder.
On 17 May 2005, the applicant was notified of her commander's intent
to recommend her for discharge for a condition that interfered with
military service, specifically, a mental disorder. The specific
reason for the discharge action was:
On 13 May 2005, the applicant was diagnosed with a personality
disorder that rendered her unfit for duty.
The commander advised the applicant of her right to consult legal
counsel and that military legal counsel had been obtained for her;
submit statements in her own behalf; and that failure to consult
counsel or to submit statements would constitute a waiver of her
right to do so.
The applicant after consulting with counsel waived her right to submit
statements in her behalf.
On 18 May 2005, a legal review was conducted in which the staff judge
advocate recommended the applicant be discharged with an honorable
discharge.
On 22 May 2005, the Discharge Authority directed that applicant be
discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and
rehabilitation.
The applicant was discharged on 25 May 2005, under the provisions of
AFR 36-3208, Section B, paragraph 5.11.9, Conditions That Interfere
with Military Services, in the grade of airman with an honorable
discharge. She served 11 months and 25 days of active duty service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1DP recommends the requested relief be denied. A1DP states
in accordance with Public Law (PL) 97-362 “A member must complete
first full term of service and receive and under honorable conditions
discharge” to be entitled to unemployment compensation under the
Unemployment Compensation for Ex-service members. One of the
exceptions to the law is an individual who is separated with the
narrative reason for separation being “Personality Disorder.” A
member with that narrative reason for separation must have completed
365 days of continuous active duty and received an under honorable
service discharge. They further state a review of the applicant’s
records reflect she served 359 days of active service and since she
did not complete 365 days of continuous service, her military income
cannot be used for unemployment compensation.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
17 February 2006, for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
The applicant provided a copy of her medical records in support of her
application (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and
adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. While
the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty for a
condition that interfered with military service (Personality
Disorder), she did not complete the required 365 days of continuous
active duty to be entitled to unemployment compensation under the
Unemployment Compensation for Ex-service members. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-03730 in Executive Session on 6 April 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Nov 05, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/A1DF, dated 6 Feb 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 06.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, Copy of Medical Records.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02636
The MEB referred the applicant’s case to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 September 2005 for review and response within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 19 Sep 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01725
On 8 Jul 03, the applicant was notified by her military training flight (MTF) commander she was recommending the applicant’s discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with military service, mental disorders. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03168
On 9 July 1990, the applicant was notified of her commander's intent to recommend her for discharge for a condition that interfered with military service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s records is warranted. The Medical Consultant states the discharge action, characterization of service and narrative reason for separation are well supported by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02462
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02462 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 2002 uncharacterized entry level separation (ELS) for personality disorder be changed to an honorable discharge [with a different narrative reason and separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02390
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from her military personnel record. At the time the applicant was being evaluated in the Air Force disability evaluation system, her depression and hypothyroidism were not separately unfitting and did not warrant a separate rating from the rating for fatigue. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe she has suffered from an...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-02390
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from her military personnel record. At the time the applicant was being evaluated in the Air Force disability evaluation system, her depression and hypothyroidism were not separately unfitting and did not warrant a separate rating from the rating for fatigue. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe she has suffered from an...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03058
According to a Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 25 June 2008, she was placed in a Not Present for Duty Status in accordance with Air Force Instruction 48-123, paragraph (A)(2) and Air Force Reserve Command Surgeon General Policy Memorandum 06-01, due to a non- duty related medical condition that required a Worldwide Duty Evaluation (WDE) and evaluation by an MEB or PEB. Further, it must be noted the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01789
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, which provided clinical evidence that she had a real medical problem that produced the symptoms and conditions used to suggest the diagnosis of Dysthymia and Personality Disorder. She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer only four months after her discharge from the Air Force. The BCMR Medical Consultant concludes that the applicant’s diagnosis of personality...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01535
The board recommended the applicant be permanently retired with a compensable rating of 60 percent. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Jun 06 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01903
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201903BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20130509 Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Air Force Board for...