AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02693
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02693 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 17 November 1964, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend him for an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02702
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _____________________ AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02702 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All information relating to his involuntary retirement be removed from his P0610C Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and his corrected record be given Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02717
Since being discharged from the Air Force he has worked diligently to better his life and he is a productive citizen in his community. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The applicant’s time in military service was about two years, and a little less than half of that time was spent either AWOL or in confinement.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02728
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial and states that the applicant’s discharge to include his character of service was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instructions and was within the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02733
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02733 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The circumstances surrounding his discharge were unjust. After careful...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02736
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. In April 2011, the applicant and his commander completed the Officer Initial Skills Training (IST) Elimination package which included the Officer Training Eliminee Recoupment Statement where he specifically acknowledged that he may be subject to recoupment of a portion of education assistance. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02745
He was credited with an additional 2 non-paid inactive duty training points, for Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-02745 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. lieutenant colonel by the Calendar Year 2011 Line and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02765
The applicant reached his date of eligibility for sanctuary protection under AFI 36-2131 and Title 10 USC 12686; however, a MSD waiver package was not submitted or approved by the ANG; therefore, he was processed for transfer to the Retired Reserve IAW the governing directives and was not improperly and illegally removed from active duty and retired. First, his orders were in fact long-term (greater than 179 days) and that he was in fact eligible to apply for sanctuary protection under 10...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02775
The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that other than the administrative correction made to his records, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02778
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02778 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty reflect his Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02783
On 10 Dec 70, the Air Force Military Personnel Center (AFMPC) reviewed the case and recommended disapproval stating there was insufficient justification to support a waiver of the one year ADSC. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02784
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 13 Jun 05, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserves (USAFR). A1K states the applicant’s record reflects he was discharged from the USAFR for a disability that existed-prior-to-service (EPTS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02785
Section 12731 to allow members to reduce theirretired pay age of 60 by 3 months for each aggregate of 90 days of qualifying active duty service fiscal year. A review of the applicants record shows he turns 60 on 14 March2019 and would normally be entitled to draw Reserve retired payon that date. The complete DPPT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 August 2012, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02799
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02799 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record, to include an Air Force Commendation Medal, Second Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 2OLC) awarded for the period 7 Jul 10 to 19 Sep 11, be considered for promotion by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the P0411D Major Central Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02825
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to honorable. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02827
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 December 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02845
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02845 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02849
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSID recommends denial of the AFEM. DPSID state they were unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s military personnel record that verifies he was deployed to the qualifying area of responsibility (AOR) in support of operations in Grenada for award of the AFEM. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870
However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. After the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate found the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02887
Each request is considered based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. On 21 December 2012, the PH Review Board considered and denied the applicant’s request for award of the PH w/1OLC. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we find that he has not met his burden of proving that he should be entitled to an additional PH for injuries...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02896
In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memorandum on Fitness Program “if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.” In this instance it is clear the applicant did not report to the MTF upon completion of her FA due to the elevated heart rate. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. On 25 October 2011, his commander notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02914
The applicant has not provided any supporting documentation (i.e. signed promotion roster by the promotion authority or promotion orders) to sustain he should have been promoted to the grade of CMSgt or that he was ever selected for promotion by the promotion authority. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The first paragraph of the advisory opinion states that he claims he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02952
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02952 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His second deferral for promotion to the grade of major be removed from his records and he receive supplemental promotion consideration. Members of the IRR are part of the Reserve Active Status List (RASL), and by law, must be considered for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02959
AFBCMR BC-2012-02959 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02962
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. While this order does not identify the specific dates the applicant served in Korea, we find the order sufficient evidence to conclude he likely served enough time in Korea during the period of eligibility to warrant award of the KDSM. We find no evidence in the applicants record, nor has he submitted any to verify his entitlement to the AFEM.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02970
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the relief...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02983
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed in the fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-02983 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02986 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 17 August 2010, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02987
On 13 Jul 11, the DoD/IG office completed their review of the applicants reprisal case and determined that there was no evidence of reprisal/abuse of authority. On 19 Jan 12, the DoD/IG completed their review of the applicants complaint dated 4 Jul 11, and determined that there was no evidence of reprisal by her former commander. DPSID states that Air Force policy is that an evaluation report is accurate as written when it becomes a matter of record.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02991
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION ARPC/DPT recommends denial, indicating the applicant is not currently in a military category and therefore not authorized a military ID card. However, while the applicant is ineligible for an ID card, he can carry a copy of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02996
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects his RE code as 4C, his separation code as JFW and his narrative reason for separation as Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards. __________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denying the applicants request for an RE code change. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03010 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be able to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his children. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03063
Based upon the applicants civilian conviction, his commander notified him that he was being recommended for an undesirable discharge in accordance with Air Force Manual 39-12, Section C, paragraph 2-23. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. In the interest of justice we considered upgrading the characterization of his discharge on the basis of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03087
The OSA has responded well to CPAP. On 4 June 2010, the applicant non-concurred with the IPEB findings and requested a formal hearing with counsel, contending she was unfit for duty and should receive a 30 percent disability rating for her Depression with Anxiety and another 30 percent for migraine headaches for a combined disability rating of 50 percent and a permanent retirement. The FPEB considered her OSA as a condition that could be unfitting but was not currently compensable or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03098
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03098 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. There is no record of the applicant making a Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03120
AFBCMR BC-2012-03120 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former members records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03148
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 November 2010 8 February 2011 13 October 2011 * 25 April 2012 24 July 2012 *Contested FA score. The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends he had been performing physical therapy and rehabilitation from a previous surgery during his FA on 25 Apr 12, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that his alleged medical condition precluded him from receiving a fair FA.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03153
He be reinstated as an active member of the Air Force Reserve, effective 15 October 2010, with award of IDT points consistent with the average IDT points he earned between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2010. In this respect, we believe the evidence provided makes it clear that a serious personality conflict existed between the applicant and certain members of his chain of command as validated by Inspector General (IG) complaints filed by his supervisory chain and the applicant himself, as well...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03168
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03168 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant was discharged from active duty in the grade of senior airman effective 19 March 1980 with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03184
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03184 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated into the Air Force or have his reentry (RE) code changed to allow him to reenter the military. We also note the Air Force office of primary responsibility asserts that had the Air Force been made aware of the applicants arrest, it...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03252
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. It is awarded to all United States Air Force service members who after 1 January 1963, qualified as expert in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. DPSID indicates that after a thorough review of the applicants military service record, they were unable to locate official documentation verifying he qualified as expert with either the handgun or the M-16 rifle.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03270
He was credited with four years of active duty service, including two years, eight months and five days of foreign service. DPSID states that after a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record and review by the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments, the applicant failed to substantiate he served any time in Vietnam; therefore, he does not meet the criteria for these awards. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03274
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03274 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03276
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Roswell, New Mexico as her home of record at the time of her enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03296
The Air Force personnel confirmed that he would receive a medical discharge within six months and rejoin the Air Force. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the applicant be corrected to show that he was discharged on 27 February...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03299
AFBCMR BC-2012-03299 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03317
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was forced to accept the findings and recommendations of his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) even though he did not agree with them. On 20 Jul 10, the applicant initialed the following statement on his AF Form 1180, Action on IPEB Finding and Recommended Disposition, “I agree with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB and am waiving the right to a formal PEB hearing.” On 21 Jul 10, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03318
Notwithstanding the correction to his records, the applicant asserts he would have been promoted to TSgt effective 1 Jan 2012 had his CAFSC been correctly reflected in his records. We note that the applicants effective date of his CAFSC was corrected and he received supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of TSgt in his CAFSC and was selected. The applicant is now contending that had his CAFSC been correctly reflected in his records in Aug 2010, he would have been promoted to...