AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02991
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be issued a new ID card showing his correct grade of major
(O-4).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His last ID card shows his grade as captain and it should
reflect major. His ID card is in poor condition and he would
greatly appreciate a replacement as he frequently uses it for
the purpose of obtaining discounts. He possesses correspondence
from the Department of the Air Force addressing him as a Major.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
ID Card and a copy of an aeronautical order from his military
personnel records which reflects his grade as major.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicant’s military personnel records, on
21 Nov 72, he was relieved from his assignment with the inactive
status list reserve section (ISLRS) and honorably discharged
from all appointments in the grade of major (O-4).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION
ARPC/DPT recommends denial, indicating the applicant is not
currently in a military category and therefore not authorized a
military ID card. On 27 Jul 72, the applicant was sent a
Notification of Proposed Action stating he had not met the
eligibility requirements for retention. He was offered the
opportunity to transfer to the Honorary Retired Reserves at that
time; however, due to lack of a response from the applicant, he
was discharged on 21 Nov 72. As such, the applicant is not
currently in a military category and therefore is not authorized
a military ID card. In order to be authorized an ID card, he
must be in a military status. However, while the applicant is
ineligible for an ID card, he can carry a copy of his discharge
order as proof he was honorably discharged in the rank of major
from the Air Force Reserve.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02991 in Executive Session on 17 Jan 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jul 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPT, dated 12 Sep 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Sep 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00473
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00473 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service was active duty support work, rather than active duty for training...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04398
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04398 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, and a Uniformed Services Identification Card in conjunction with his separation from the Air Force Reserve. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02877
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02877 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military records be corrected to include his Air Force Reserve time. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05436
Before issuing the LOR, the OG/CC requested a copy of the LOR purportedly given to the applicant while performing duties at Tyndall AFB since there was no record of the LOR in the applicants personnel file. The OG/CC never received a copy of said LOR and therefore documented the applicants misconduct with the LOR, dated 18 Sep 10. A complete copy of the AFRC/JA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04771
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04771 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His NA Form 13038, Certification of Military Service, be changed to read Active Duty instead of No active duty other than for training purposes. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He joined...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04222
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04222 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible for Reserve retired pay on 10 Nov 10, nine months prior to his 60th birthday on 10 Aug 11. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was only six days short of performing the required...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03024
The applicant provided a copy of the certificate awarding him the MSM first OLC for his outstanding service for the period 15 Feb 10 through 27 Feb 14. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05326
However, the additional time was not credited to the applicants total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) while he was still serving on active duty as a Regular Air Force commissioned officer. Therefore, the time was not accounted for on his 30 Sep 2012, DD Form 214. They recommend reversal of the previously approved addition of two months of active duty service to the applicants 30 Sep 2004 DD Form 214 by ARPC/DPTS.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02991 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. (Administratively corrected via DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, dated 7 Dec 73.) On 6 Oct 72, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04575
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTT recommends denial of his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. DPTT states that although the applicant would have been otherwise eligible for the benefit per the Verification of Members Active Duty Service...