AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02887
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) with one oak leaf cluster
(PH w/1OLC).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He did not receive all his medals. He was a Jewish Prisoner of
War (POW) and should get a PH for injuries he sustained as the
result of being hit in the neck by German guards. In this
respect, he contends the following:
1. He saved a POW from being “beat up” by German guards. He
told the guard the POW was “crazy.” Subsequently, the POW was
killed by the guards when he tried to escape from the hospital.
2. He walked through the Australian Alps for 18 days
(approximately 220 miles) and was liberated by General Patton’s
tank corps. He was “boxed” in Camp 17B, dug tunnels 15 feet
under the barracks, and should be awarded a medal for trying to
escape.
3. He served in the beginning of two wars (1938/1945) and was a
POW from 1943 until 1945. If it had been discovered that he was
Jewish, he would have been put in a Jewish camp. He is willing
to take a lie detector test.
4. He captured a German soldier, put him in the POW line and
sold his P-38 Luger for 5,000 Francs.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 February 1941, the applicant entered active service.
He was shot down during a combat mission, captured and held as a
POW in Austria from 10 July 1943 to 2 May 1945.
On 13 October 1945, the applicant was honorably discharged from
the Army of the United States, Air Corps, for Convenience of the
Government. He served 3 years, 7 months and 10 days of total
active service and is credited with 1 year and 1 month of
Foreign Service.
AFPC/DPPPRA notified the applicant they were able to verify his
entitlement to the PH for an injury to his left hand due to
flak.
_________________________________________________________________
POLICY AND LAW:
In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations,
dated 22 Sep 43, during the period in question, the PH was
awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the
United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy,
provided such wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer.
For the purpose of awarding the PH, a wound was defined as an
injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element,
or agent, sustained as the result of a hostile act of the enemy,
or while in action in the face of the enemy. When a person
eligible for award of the PH was treated for a wound, the
commanding officer of the hospital, or the medical officer who
treated the wound, furnished the commanding officer of the
wounded person a certificate briefly describing the nature of
the wound, and certifying the necessity of treatment. In
addition, a wounded soldier’s unsupported statement could be
accepted in unusual or extenuating circumstances when, in the
opinion of the officer making the award, no corroborative
evidence was obtainable. However, the statement would be
substantiated if possible.
In 1996, PH policy was revised to expand eligibility to
servicemembers who are injured, wounded, or die in captivity,
while a qualifying POW, as determined by their eligibility to
wear the POW Medal. For those who die in captivity their death
must have been the result of enemy action, or the result of
wounds incurred in action with the enemy during capture, or as a
result of wounds incurred as a result of enemy action during
capture; unless compelling evidence is presented to the
contrary. The revised policy is retroactive to 7 December 1941.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. DPSID states the applicant was
unable to provide any dates of the injuries, medical
documentation, or witness statements to fulfill the criteria for
award of the PH w/1OLC. To grant the applicant relief would be
contrary to the eligibility criteria established by Department
of Defense Manual 1348.33, Manual of Military Decorations and
2
Awards. The PH Review Board has the authority (on behalf of the
Secretary of the Air Force), to determine a veteran’s
entitlement to the PH. Each request is considered based on the
policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was
injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary
evidence presented.
On 21 December 2012, the PH Review Board considered and denied
the applicant’s request for award of the PH w/1OLC.
The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 8 February 2013, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not
received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant’s contentions, we find that he has not met his burden
of proving that he should be entitled to an additional PH for
injuries he sustained as the result of being hit in the neck by
German guards while held as a POW. The applicant’s personal
statement is duly noted; however, his Report of Separation
issued in conjunction with his 13 October 1945 separation,
indicates the only wound he received in action was to his left
hand when it was hit by flak while on a combat mission over
France. The personal sacrifice the applicant endured for our
nation is noted and our decision in no way diminishes the high
regard we have for his service; however, insufficient
documentary evidence has been presented to substantiate that he
is entitled to an additional PH. In view of the above and in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
3
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2012-02887 in Executive Session on 28 March 2013, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 June 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 January 2013,
w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 February 2013.
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00937
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR advises that, to be awarded the PH, a member must provide detailed evidence/documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and received treatment by medical personnel. By the time he was liberated from the POW camp nine months later, his wounds had healed and no further treatment was necessary. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Jun 04, w/atchs.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012856
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A record pertaining to the applicant is included in this file and it shows he was detained as a POW from 4 December 1944 to 29 May 1945 while assigned to the 398th Infantry Regiment. In the absence of the applicants official military personnel file (OMPF), the evidence in this case is jointly derived from his WD AGO Form 53-55, witness statement and accounts, NARA WWII POW Data File, 1st Battalion...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03224
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. The applicant has not provided any documentation or corroborating evidence that he suffered any injuries or wounds while a POW in Germany.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04015
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the statement from the former POW, the majority of the Board is not persuaded the applicant was wounded as a direct result of enemy action. The applicant is a former Army Air Corps B-17, Flying Fortress, navigator who seeks award of the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received during a bombing mission over Berlin, Germany, on 20 February 1944. The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was injured...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05131
Furthermore, the several supporting statements she provides are more than sufficient to establish that her deceased father sustained a qualifying injury when his plane was shot down by the enemy. While we note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating that such entries could relate to combat or non-combat related injuries, we find it substantially more likely that these wounds were the result of enemy action and therefore met the criteria for the award of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02988
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02988 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart Medal. He was informed, that until his VA physical examination, there was no evidence in his medical records that he had a scar on his arm or that he had been wounded...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02988
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02988 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart Medal. He was informed, that until his VA physical examination, there was no evidence in his medical records that he had a scar on his arm or that he had been wounded...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03304
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant has provided no medical evidence showing that he was injured while a POW, and there is no evidence in his military medical records to indicate he was injured while a POW. Additionally, in 1988, the Veterans Administration determined the evidence of record did not show right ankle or right knee injuries. ...
While receiving treatment, he was informed that he was to receive the PH Medal for service-connected injuries at the hands of the enemy. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. 2 AFBCMR 96-03428 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated that he is extremely disappointed in DPPPRA' s recommendation to deny his application. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Feb 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01670
The applicant received frostbite injuries in January 1945 while a POW; however, frostbite is not normally an injury which qualifies a member for entitlement to the PH. In this respect, we note Army Regulation 600-45, provides that the PH Medal may be awarded to members who are wounded in action against an enemy of the United States, and defined a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained as a result of a hostile act of the enemy. Exhibit...