AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03148
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 25 April 2012 be removed from
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had been performing physical therapy and rehabilitation from a
previous surgery. During his fitness assessment he aggravated
the pre-existing injury contributing to his unsatisfactory score
and resulting in additional surgery. Proper procedures for
processing members injured while testing were not followed.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
senior airman.
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows:
DATE
10 November 2010
8 February 2011
13 October 2011
* 25 April 2012
24 July 2012
*Contested FA score.
On 25 July 2012, DPSIM advised the applicant to provide
additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim
(i.e., AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, AF Form 422,
Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status,
documenting his limitations and exemptions, and AF Form 108,
Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing,
SCORE
UNSATISIFACTORY
EXCELLENT
EXCELLENT
UNSATISFACTORY
EXCELLENT
indicating that he had a pre-existing condition that contributed
to his FA failure, signed fitness assessment score sheet and
signed fitness questionnaire) within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 25 July 2012, a
memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional
documentation. The applicant did not respond.
The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 6 November 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case. While the applicant contends he had been
performing physical therapy and rehabilitation from a previous
surgery during his FA on 25 Apr 12, we do not find the evidence
provided sufficient to conclude that his alleged medical
condition precluded him from receiving a fair FA. In view of
this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided
that indicates the applicant was unable to complete his FA, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03148 in Executive Session on 15 February 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03148 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 July 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 October 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 November 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03476
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-03476 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 30 March 2012 and 28 June 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Board notes the comments of the BCMR Medical Consultant, indicating there is a direct relationship between...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02440
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received unsatisfactory FA scores due to his marginal run times. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this case are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 25 Jul, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00425
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment dated 30 Nov 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02827
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 December 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02325
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02325 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 24 April 2012 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02389
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 October 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). However, the FA test dated 16 February 2011, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the assessment was unjust. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056
The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04398
Therefore, to preclude the possibility of an injustice to the applicant, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was exempt from the cardio components of the Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 28 Dec 10, 25 Mar 11, 23 Jun 11, and 30 Apr 12. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01347
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should have been “exempt” from performing the sit-up portion of the FA test. ...