AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02728
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to rejoin the
military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not told that he would not be allowed to rejoin the
military at the time of his discharge.
The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation.
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 19 Aug 08.
His commander notified him that he was recommending that he be
discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32
and AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, paragraph 5.49, Minor Disciplinary
Infractions. After a legal review, the Deputy Staff Judge
Advocate found it legally sufficient. The applicant was
discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge
and a RE code of “2B” (Separated with a general or under-other-
than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge) on 9 Jun 09 after
serving 9 months and 21 days on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial and states that the applicant’s
discharge to include his character of service was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
instructions and was within the discharge authority’s discretion.
Further, the applicant’s misconduct clearly outweighs the
positive aspects of his service and every effort was made by his
supervisory chain to rehabilitate him; however, he did not
overcome the deficiencies.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial by stating that his RE code is
correct per the general discharge that he received and is
required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF. The
applicant has not provided any proof of an error or injustice
occurring with regard to his “2B” RE code.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 17 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that
the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. At
the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are
furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service
and circumstances of their separation. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record, we believe that given the
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code
issued was in accordance with the appropriate directives.
Therefore, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable
action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02728 in Executive Session on 23 Jan 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jun 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 8 Aug 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Sep 12.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12.
Panel Chair
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02657
According to the DD Form 214, on 2 Aug 13, the applicant was discharged for Misconduct (Minor Infractions) with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) in the grade of airman first class. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants requests to change his RE code to 1# indicating the applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code 2B, but states he was unjustly discharged. THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE Code 1 so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military. The only available RE Code a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02298
On or about 18 Oct 11, he was derelict in the performance of his duties in that he willfully failed to refrain from sleeping during a meeting, as it was his duty to do, as evidenced by a Record of Proceedings of Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment, dated 30 Nov 11. c. On or about 30 Aug 11, he was derelict in the performance of his duties in that he willfully returned late from lunch and refused to perform tasks assigned to him, as it was his duty to do, as evidenced by a Record of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected: a. The applicants DD Form 214 reflects a Separation Code of JKN and a Reentry Code of 2B The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04482
Block 17 be changed to indicate he was not provided all appropriate dental services prior to separation. On 8 Nov 12, AFPC/DPSIT directed the applicants DD Form 214, Block 14, Military Education, be changed to reflect (IVK) Underwater Egress Training, Nov 2008. On 23 Jun 13, SAF/MRBR directed the applicants DD Form 214, Block 20, Member Requests Copy 6 be Sent to California Director of Veterans Affairs, be changed to reflect No. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03500
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice concerning the applicants request for BMT Honor Graduate status or the SAEMR. A thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record revealed no documentation which establishes the applicant was awarded either the Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon or the SAEMR. Since the applicant received his DD Form 214, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02335
On 6 Apr 12, the Discharge Review Board (DRB) denied the applicants requests to upgrade his discharge, change his narrative reason for separation and RE code. A complete copy of the AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial as it pertains to the applicants request to change the SPD code, narrative reason for separation, and character of service. Therefore, as the applicant has presented no evidence to indicate that the commander abused his discretionary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02788
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02788 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 30 Jun 87, the applicant received a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for separation of Homosexuality Acts and corresponding separation code of HRA. His DD Form 214, reflects a Reenlistment (RE)...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04905
DPSOR recommends that his narrative reason for separation be changed from Convenience of the Government to Unsatisfactory Performance. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code to a 1. DPSOA states that on 28 Aug 2012, his commander approved his involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05451
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05451 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed to one which will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...