Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02986
Original file (BC-2012-02986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02986 

COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 17 August 2010, be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His second FA occurred during a deployment to Kadena Air Base, 
Japan, in August of 2010. During this time, he injured his back 
the month prior and did not receive a profile until after he 
tested due to unforeseen administrative hold-ups. He did not opt 
out of the test because he was told that unless he was sick or 
had a profile, he had to test on all components. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6). 

 

The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s 
military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided 
by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. DPSIM states that as a 
result of their request, the applicant provided an Air Force Form 
469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 6 August 2010 with an 
expiration date of 5 September 2010, stating no lifting of 
greater than 50 pounds, no repetitive motion using back and no 
weight bearing on back. Therefore, they recommend the cardio and 
sit-up components of his FA, dated 17 August 2010, be updated to 
reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. As a result, his overall FA score 
will change to reflect a satisfactory score of 75.33. 

 


The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 30 October 2012, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice requiring partial 
relief. We note that AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio and sit-up 
components of the applicant’s FA, dated 17 August 2010, be 
corrected to reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS based on his Duty 
Limiting Condition Report, dated 6 August 2010. We agree with 
their recommendation. We took notice of the applicant’s request 
to have the entire FA removed; however, he was cleared for all 
other components of the FA; therefore, we do not find any 
evidence to support removing the entire test. Accordingly, we 
recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and 
sit-up components of his Fitness Assessment, dated 17 August 
2010, be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness 
Management System. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 16 April 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-
02986 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Jul 12, with atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 23 Jul 12. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Aug 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Oct 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03650

    Original file (BC 2012 03650.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 26 Feb 12 should be removed from his records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12. Acting Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2012-03650 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097

    Original file (BC-2012-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00021

    Original file (BC-2012-00021.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, E, and G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his 19 Feb 2010 FA from the AFFMS. DPSIM states the applicant is requesting his FA dated 19 Feb 2010 be removed from the AFFMS. The complete DPSID evaluation, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244

    Original file (BC-2012-04244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect “Exempt” for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02768

    Original file (BC 2012 02768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This logic also concludes a medical condition causing weight gain would cause an increase in AC. She should have never taken the walk test while her dosage was still being adjusted and the FA should be invalidated based on the solid medical evidence presented. While we note the applicant requests the entire FA dated 25 Apr 2012, be removed, the AF Form 422 reflected that she was cleared to test using AC and she has not provided substantial evidence to persuade us otherwise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813

    Original file (BC-2012-02813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596

    Original file (BC 2012 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicant’s stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04774

    Original file (BC-2012-04774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04774 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 10 July 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to “exempt” the applicant from the sit-up, push-up...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03159

    Original file (BC-2012-03159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval by updating the cardio component of the FA dated 13 Jun 12 to reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS. While the applicant requests that his entire FA dated 13 Jun 12, be removed from his records, we note the AF Form 469 does not exempt him from the abdominal circumference, push-up, and sit-up components of his FA, therefore, these scores should remain as recorded. Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00377

    Original file (BC-2013-00377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the applicant's DD Form 149, he also indicated he had ankle pain when completing the sit-up component of the 31 August 2012 FA. Unfortunately, neither profile exempts him from the sit-up component. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...