Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02775
Original file (BC-2012-02775.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02775 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Small Arms 
Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He should have been awarded the SAEMR.  Two areas on his target 
were shot out and common sense tells you that one or more rounds 
went thru these holes. 
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  DD 
Form  214,  Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of  Transfer 
or Discharge; AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, and a National 
Personnel Records Center memorandum   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant served on active duty from 25 Mar 66 to 23 Jan 70. 
He served 3 years and 10 months of total active service.  
 
AFPC/DPSID was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the 
AFGCM for his service during the period 25 Mar 66 to 23 Jan 70.  
The  applicant’s  records  will  be  administratively  corrected  to 
reflect award of the AFGCM. 
 
The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 
1  Jan  63,  qualify  as  “expert”  in  small-arms  marksmanship  with 
either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSID  recommends  denial.    DPSID’s  states  there  is 
insufficient  evidence  in  the  applicant’s  military  personnel 
records  to  support  that  he  met  the  criteria  for  award  of  the 
 
 

SAEMR,  i.e.,  qualified  expert  with  either  the  M-16  rifle  or 
issue handgun.  
 
The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 10 Sep 12, for review and comment within 30 days.  
As  of  this  date,  no  response  has  been  received  by  this  office 
(Exhibit C). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  that  other  than  the 
administrative correction made to his records, the applicant has 
not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    In  view  of  the 
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to grant the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-02775  in  Executive  Session  on  5  Feb  13,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 

2 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence pertaining was considered: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jun 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 4 Sep 12, w/atch. 
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Sep 12. 

 
Panel Chair 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03049

    Original file (BC 2014 03049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issued handgun. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID notes the applicant’s entitlement RVGC w/P, AFLSA, AFOUA, PUC, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03433

    Original file (BC-2012-03433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID states that the SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 24 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03035

    Original file (BC-2012-03035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with One Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS). The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualify as “expert” in small-arms...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02778

    Original file (BC-2012-02778.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02778 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty reflect his Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04499

    Original file (BC 2013 04499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04710

    Original file (BC-2012-04710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04710 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be updated to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and any other awards he may be eligible to receive. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05391

    Original file (BC 2012 05391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who after, 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small...