AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03326
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03326 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). On 17 May 90, the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03329
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03329 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for missions he flew during World War II (WWII). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The 9-man flight crew he was assigned to flew 35 combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03336
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03336 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show award of the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM) or any other campaign awards issued to participants in support of Operation EAGLE CLAW. By the applicants own admission, he served in Egypt in support of Operation EAGLE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03340
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03340 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Jun 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03347
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03347 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03357
In 2006, when he retired he was never informed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) or anyone else that he was eligible for post retirement education benefits under any program subsequent, to include the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB); or that he could convert his MGIB to the Post-9/11 GI Bill; or that he could transfer his benefit to his dependents, or any family member so they could use his benefits. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03359
AFBCMR BC-2012-03359 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03366
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03372
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03372 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be issued the Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KU-SA) for being deployed to Saudi Arabia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03413
The RE code 6H is an Air Force sanctioned and recognized code and is found in the Military Personnel Data System. This code applies to the Air National Guard and is used when a member is not selected for further retention in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03416
AFBCMR BC-2012-03416 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that the pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03418
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His total active service be changed to reflect 20 years for the purpose of receiving Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03422
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the service characterization was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03433
DPSID states that the SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 24 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03441
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He completed the submission portion of the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) for his daughter in Sep or Oct 09, transferring 100 percent of his benefits at that time. In Sep or Oct 09, he "transferred" his education benefits to his daughter, but there is no record of him doing the transfer. Since, he had completed that portion of the process the information was not new to him.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03465 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 19 Jun 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 Nov 2012, a copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03468
His first sergeant attempted to assist him with obtaining a hardship discharge; however, he found out that it could take up to two years. On 28 Nov 2007, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force with a RE code of 2C. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03474
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of her request to upgrade her discharge. The applicant was, however, punished not by her immediate supervisor based on his personal evaluation of her, but by her squadron commander for the repeated failure to report for duty on time. With respect to her request that her rank be restored to SrA, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03488
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 May 12, the applicant was disenrolled from the AFROTC program under the provisions of AFI 36-2011, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps Program, para 6.1.5, and AFROTCI 36-2011, Cadet Operations, para 11.4.2.3, for failure to maintain military retention standards. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Holm Center/JA recommends denial, stating, in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03495
AFBCMR BC-2012-03495 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03501
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. The Cold War Certificate recognizes members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the United States Government who served the United States during the Cold War. DPSID states the applicant should contact the Department of the Army to obtain a Cold War Certificate for his service during the specified time period at the website or address provided.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03503 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability retirement be changed to reflect that he was retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03506
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request for Foreign Service time in the Republic of Vietnam. There is insufficient evidence to verify award of the SAEMR. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03513 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03516
His DD Form 214, for the period 22 Nov 51 to 11 Aug 55, reflects he was awarded the following medals: the National Defense Service Medal, United Nations Service Medal, and the Korean Service Medal. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) has done a thorough review of the applicants military records and were unable to verify his entitlement to the aforementioned awards and decorations. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03520
MRBP states that the AFDB considered the applicant (and another Air Force officer) for award of the AmnM on 7 Aug 2009 and disapproved the award, recommending downgrade to the AFCM for an act of courage. Also included in the file was the AFBCMR request for upgrade to the AmnM. The Board acknowledges the act of courage and personal sacrifices of the applicant on 6 Jan 2008; however, we believe his commander acted within his authority in determining the AFCM was the most appropriate...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03521
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to exempt the cardio component of his FA dated 24 July 2012. The medical evidence provided in support of his request is noted; however, in the absence of a copy of his fitness score sheet for his FA dated 24 July 2012 and his AF Form 108, stating that he had a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing fitness score, we find...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03529
The Board has been advised that it can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is evidence that the member or former spouse timely notified the Government within one year after the divorce was final, or if there are extraordinary circumstances that would justify correction of the record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03532
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void the FA, dated 23 Feb 11, stating, in part, that the applicant had an emergency appendectomy surgery on 25 Jan 11 and was released on 30 Jan 11. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Sep 12 for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03535
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio components of her FAs dated 21 Oct 2010 and 27 Oct 2011 reflect exempt in the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio components of her FAs dated 21 Oct 2010 and 27 Oct 2011,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03536
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03536 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His original recommendation for award of the Silver Star (SS) for his actions on 19 May 68 be approved. The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03544
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force does not automatically award the Korean Duty Medal to their personnel. On 1 Apr 2012, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Records, requesting entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and the Korean Service Medal (KSM). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03597
A1K states in accordance with AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives, para 1.1.1., non-prior service personnel must enlist in a bonus Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) in effect on the date of their enlistment in order to be given the entitlement incentive. Therefore, we believe it is in the interest of justice to grant the applicant the enlistment incentive bonus he would have received for the time served in the Air Force Reserve had he held an approved DAFSC on the day he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03602
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Although the applicants DD Form 214 reflects that he served from 2 Aug 90 through 23 Feb 91, in support of Operation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03603
On 23 May 1994, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the discharge notification and provided a personal statement and numerous character letters. On 9 Jun 1994, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with a service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03604 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded an additional AM based on his service which was highlighted in the Air Force Times, Berlin Airlift Veterans Association, and the Task...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03609
On 27 May 1983, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Air Force. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03615
JAJM states that upgrading the applicants BCD is not appropriate and recommends the Board deny the request as untimely or on the merits. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03616
He served in Vietnam and there should be some record of his service. Should the applicant provide additional documentation e.g., copy of travel voucher, we would be willing to reconsider his appeal. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03616 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03618
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03618 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 Jul 85, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air Force. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03621
The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) has the authority, on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, to determine a veterans entitlement to the Purple Heart. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Nov 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03623
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03623 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for 20 years of active service toward retirement. He believes because of this injustice he should be credited with the 45 days of service in order to qualify for the Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP). No provisions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03634
DPSIM states that the applicant provided a letter from DFAS, dated 2 Aug 2012, stating that a re-audit of his account revealed that he was entitled to sell 29.5 days of leave due to late posting of his terminal leave and due to being AWOL for one day on 25 Jan 2011. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 2 Jan 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jan 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03638
He was injured while on active duty for more than 30 days; however, his LOD determination was not completed in time for him to receive MEDCON orders for the period of his surgery and convalescent leave. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant, a member of the Air Force Reserve, was issued activation orders for a tour of active duty in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM from 3 Jan 11 to 18 Jun 11. Exhibit D. Letter, 452nd AMDS,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639
There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicants request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03660
Two days later, he completed actions to transfer half of his benefits to his daughter. The counseling notes reflect the applicant was “advised to monitor the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), and the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) website for updates and status.” Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319(f)(1) states “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03681 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 29 Aug 77, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied a similar request by the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03686
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03686 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) test score dated 23 Apr 12, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Upon taking the retest, the applicant was again successful in completing his FA as he was in many occasions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03703
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03703 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 11 Nov 11 [sic] be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...