Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02733
Original file (BC-2012-02733.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
 
 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02733 
COUNSEL:  
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  under  other  than  honorable  conditions  (UOTHC)  discharge  be 
upgraded to honorable  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
The  circumstances  surrounding  his  discharge  were  unjust.    He 
admittedly fell asleep on duty but strongly feels the punishment 
does  not  fit  the  crime.    He  was  too  young  to  understand  the 
injustice perpetrated against him and regrets having this blemish 
on his record.  
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed in the 
fire  at  the  National  Personnel  Records  Center  (NPRC)  in  1973.  
Therefore,  the  facts  surrounding  his  separation  cannot  be 
verified.   
 
Data extracted from the applicant’s reconstructed record reflects 
he  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  5  Jan  60,  and  was 
discharged  under  the  provisions  of  AFR-39-17  (Unfitness),  with 
service  characterized  as  under  other  than  honorable  conditions 
(UOTHC) in the grade of airman basic and issued a DD Form 258AF, 
Undesirable  Discharge  Certificate.    He  served  2  years,  1  month 
and 17 days of total active service.  
 
Pursuant  to  the  Board’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of 
Investigations (FBI) Clarksburg, WV, states they were unable to 
identify  an  arrest  record  on  the  basis  of  the  information 
furnished (Exhibit C).  
 
On  23  Jan  13,  the  AFBCMR  staff  offered  the  applicant  an 
opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities 
since  leaving  the  service.    In  response  to  the  request  the 
applicant’s  counsel  provided  a  personal  letter  indicating  the 
applicant was a model “soldier,” notwithstanding, the mistake he 

admittedly made falling asleep on duty.  He has worked hard all 
his life.  He has been a successful member of every community he 
lived in, giving back to the community his talent and time.  All 
of  his  hard  work  and  accomplishments  were  made  without  his 
knowledge of the less than honorable discharge he received as a 
19  year  old.    He  has  proven  himself  to  be  a  responsible  and 
productive member of society.   
 
Counsel’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
E. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  We  have  thoroughly  reviewed  the  circumstances  surrounding 
the  applicant's  discharge  and  find  no  impropriety  in  the 
characterization of service.  Considered alone, we conclude the 
discharge  proceedings  were  proper  and  the  characterization  of 
the  discharge  was  appropriate  to  the  existing  circumstances.  
Consideration  of  this  Board,  however,  is  not  limited  to  the 
events  which  precipitated  the  discharge.    Further,  we  may  base 
our  decision  on  matters  of  equity  and  justice,  rather  than 
simply  on  whether  rules  and  regulations  which  existed  at  the 
time  were  followed.  After  careful  consideration  of  the 
applicant’s  request  and  the  evidence  of  record,  we  find 
sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate 
the  existence  of  an  injustice  to  warrant  upgrading  the 
characterization of the applicant’s discharge to general (under 
honorable  conditions)  on  the  basis  of  clemency.    In  this 
respect,  we  note  that  in  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant 
has  provided  a  letter  discussing  his  honorable  character  and 
notable  achievements  in  the  over  50  years  since  his  discharge, 
to  include  gainful  employment  and  opening  his  own  businesses.  
It  appears  the  applicant  has  successfully  transitioned  to 
civilian life and the characterization of his discharge as UOTHC 
no longer serves a useful purpose.  Moreover, we find absolutely 
no  evidence  of  any  derogatory  involvement  with  any  civil 
authorities in the over 50 years since his discharge.  Based on 
a totality of the evidence before us, we find it would be unjust 
for him to continue to endure the effects of the stigma that is 
attached to a UOTHC discharge.  Therefore, in view of the above, 
we deem the interest of justice can best be served by removing 
this  blemish  from  his  life  and  upgrading  his  discharge  to 
general (under honorable conditions) on the basis of clemency.   
 
We considered upgrading his discharge to honorable; however, we 
do not believe that an upgrade to a fully honorable discharge is 
 
 

2 

warranted.    Accordingly,  we  recommend  that  his  records  be 
corrected to the extent indicated below.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The  pertinent  military  records  of  the  Department  of  the  Air 
Force  relating  to  APPLICANT  be  corrected  to  show  that  on 
16 March  1962,  he  was  discharged  with  service  characterized  as 
General (under honorable conditions).  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  Docket  Number    
BC-2012-02733  in  Executive  Session  on  7  Mar  13,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records  as  recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Jun 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Reconstructed Personnel Record. 
    Exhibit C.  Negative FBI Response, dated 8 Aug 12. 
 
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 26 Feb 13, w/atchs. 
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 23 Jan 13. 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

Panel Chair 

  

 

  
  
  

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01628

    Original file (BC-2012-01628.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01628 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 13 Jul 67, the 834 CSG/CC reviewed the case file and recommended the 9th Air Force commander (9 AF/CC) approve the applicant’s general (under honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03421

    Original file (BC-2011-03421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03421 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. Although the applicant states that he has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00261

    Original file (BC-2004-00261.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. On 19 April 2004, the Board staff requested the applicant provide information regarding his post service activities. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004- 00261 in Executive Session on 15 June 2004, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00626A

    Original file (BC-2006-00626A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, according to a National Archives & Records Administration Form 13038, dated 27 Oct 05, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 13 Jun 55, was discharged in the grade of airman third class on 18 Sep 58, but with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization. In their conclusions, the Board strongly suggested the applicant submit additional official documents, as his records were destroyed and the details of his military service and discharge could not be clearly or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00291

    Original file (BC-2005-00291.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00291 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. His request for upgrade of honorable was considered; however, in the absence of evidence by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01879A

    Original file (BC-1992-01879A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit G. On 30 Nov 05, a copy of the FBI Report was forwarded to the applicant for review and/or comment. We therefore recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Nov 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02029

    Original file (BC 2013 02029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these reasons, this Board very carefully weighs requests to upgrade the character of a discharge and, in doing so, carefully considers whether the impact of an applicant's contributions to his or her community are substantial enough for us to conclude they overcome the misconduct which precipitated the discharge and whether or not an upgrade of the discharge would create a larger injustice to those who served under honorable conditions and earned the characterization of service the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00361

    Original file (BC-2010-00361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a ticket by security forces, on 31 Jan 67, for parking illegally within a designated fire lane. The applicant provided a personal statement and letters of character reference in support of his appeal to have his discharge upgraded based on clemency; however, considering his overall record of service, the numerous offenses which led to his administrative separation, and the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03424

    Original file (BC-2006-03424.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03424 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 MAY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201559

    Original file (0201559.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01559 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...