AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05037
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty, reflect award of the Basic Aircrew Member Badge (Wings). Exhibit C. Letter, USAF/A30-AI, dated 15 February 2012. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 February 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05044
The Article 15 she received on 5 April 2007 be removed from her records. The commander however, did find the violation of Article 92 as substantiated. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends a partial grant since the issuing commander found sufficient evidence did not exist to substantiate the three alleged violations of Article 134, UCMJ.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05048
DPSIDRA states the applicant’s dates of assignment in Thailand were well after the ending date of 28 March 1973 for award of either the VSM or the RVCM; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for award of the VSM or the RVCM based on the inclusive period of the award. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters or airspace there-over and to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05054
Based on applicant’s senior airman date of rank (DOR) of 5 April 2011, the first time he would be eligible for promotion consideration to staff sergeant is cycle 12E5. The DPSOE complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 April 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05057
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In May of 1983, he found a set of golf clubs after completing a round of golf. Specifically, the applicant received an Article 15, a Letter of Reprimand and eight Records of Counseling. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05059
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends approval stating that the applicant’s narrative reason for separation and SPD code should be changed to “Secretarial Authority” and “JFF”, respectively. In light of the repeal of DADT and the applicant's record of performance, it would be appropriate to change the applicant’s RE code to “3K.” In this respect, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Reenlistment Program Manager and adopt his rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05066
The applicant and service member were provided an advisory (Exhibit C) prepared by SAF/GCM on similar cases considered by the Board. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 March 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05068
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMD recommends denial. Additionally, the Veterans Outpatient Dental Treatment for Discharged or Released Personnel letter was completed on 5 Jul 11 and was signed by the applicant and the dental representative. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05071
AFBCMR BC-2011-05071 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to reflect that on October 15, 1970, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05076
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFPC/DPSIDR will administratively correct the applicant’s AOM to AOM-G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the EAMECM and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05081
The applicant is under the misconception that as long as the decoration into administrative channels prior to the promotion cutoff date, the approved decorations would be used in the promotion process for that cycle. As such, decorations and promotions are separate processes. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence submitted in support of his appeal, we believe that credible evidence has been provided to show that his six Air Medals (2OLC/3OLC/4OLC/5OLC/6OLC and 7/OLC) were placed into...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05085
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05085 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following awards: a. Only one award of the GWOT-E is authorized for serving in OEF/OIF, regardless of how many times an individual returns to serve...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05086
Since the close out date of the applicant’s OPR is 15 Mar 07, which is the correct date for his OPR, they assume the applicant wants the signature dates of the OPR changed to dates earlier than 11 Jun 07, the convening date for the FY 08 Line and Nonline Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Promotion Selection Board (V0508A), so the OPR will be available for this board, thereby allowing his record to meet a special selection board (SSB). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05095
The commanders at the time of these nonjudicial punishment actions had the best opportunity to evaluate the evidence in these cases. The legal review processes showed that the commanders did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in making these decisions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05109
DPSIT states if the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the Board may approve the applicant’s request. None of the information he received prior to his retirement provided the specific requirement that transferability had to occur while the member was on active duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05120
The MSM was approved and placed in his records and was considered by the P0511A promotion board. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05123
The remaining relevant facts are pertaining to the application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the Bronze Star Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award w/ Valor and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. The applicant received an Air Force Commendation Medal for meritorious service for his 10 month...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05125
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Insufficient relevant evidence has been...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05136
Therefore, she is requesting that she be allowed to establish SBP coverage for her spouse at the same rate, base amount and coverage he elected for her. According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, the applicant and her spouse were married, but she declined SBP coverage prior to her 1 Jun 2009 retirement and her spouse concurred with her election. _______________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00006
AGRs were not eligible for the transfer of educational benefits at the time of his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While the passage of the Post-9/11 Veterans...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00008
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00008 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for service at Osan Air Base, Korea during the period Jun 62 to Jul 62. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00013
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00013 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 19 April 1999, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that her general discharge be upgraded to honorable (Exhibit B)....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00016
The specific reason for the proposed action was: Between 21 Apr 93 and 7 Sep 94, the applicant had one instance of disorderly conduct; one instance of voluntarily riding in a vehicle being driven by an individual who was under the influence of alcohol; one instance of AFR 35-10, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel violation, and one instance of failing to report to the Senior Enlisted Advisor when asked to. On 5 Oct 94, the Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) reviewed the case and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00018
On 23 Sep 1971, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00019
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00019 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service, be removed from her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. Based upon the applicant’s failure to disclose her prior service medical condition,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00024
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The AFEM was not authorized for the period of 2 August 1990 to 2 January 1992. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00025
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion by a Special Board (SB) for the Calendar Year 2012 (CY12) Air Force Reserve Major Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board. HQ ARPC contacted the individual noted as "counsel" on the application, explained...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00026
The applicant indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members, that he did not want counseling for education benefits prior to his retirement. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 September 2009 he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00029
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00029 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank (DOR) commensurate with the 1982 United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) year group with all appropriate back pay and allowances. As noted by AFPC/PB in its advisory, the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00031
The applicant obviously had no theory for claiming relief until it was provided for him by another Air Force officer. If the Board should find that the application is untimely, we request that the Board hear the case in the interests of justice. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the application untimely filed.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00035 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be considered by a Special Board (SB) in lieu of the Calendar Year 2011 (CY11) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Board (U0511B) that was conducted at Headquarters (HQ) Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) on 13...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00038
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00038 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his time served in support of OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM and any campaign medals awarded. The applicant did not provide any documentation in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00042
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00042 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 30 Jun 2010 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). She requested a signed letter from her supervisor; however she did not send it. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00046
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-00046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 29 March 2010 and 18 December 2009 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 13 February 2012, AFPC/DPSIMC wrote to the applicant requesting documentation to substantiate her claim,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00049
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00049 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) application be approved. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reason his TEB application was disapproved was “Service Member (SM) has not committed to the required...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00052
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force Reserve Command office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00053
On 21 Aug 81, the evaluation officer interviewed the applicant, reviewed his records and case file. On 24 Aug 81, the evaluation officer recommended the applicant be furnished and rehabilitation. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00053 in Executive Session on 26 Jul 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00058
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial noting that neither the applicant’s submission, nor his military records contain any information reflecting he served in Korea. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00061
In support of her requests, the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 910; AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; DD Form 2870, Authorization for Disclosure of Medical or Dental Information; Standard Forms (SF) 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care; AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, MEB final disposition and other documentation associated with her request. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00074
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00074 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. However, based on his submission of the original signed citation, we believe reasonable doubt has been established that he was awarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00075
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not provide documentation to validate that he attended Ammunition School, although his WD AGO Form 53-54 did say he attended Ordnance School in Lansing Michigan...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00078
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Addressing the applicant’s request to be awarded the AM 1/OLC, the applicant did not provide any documentation that supports this request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00084
He was not aware that he could write a letter to the board to request he be selected for separation. The board reviewed the applicant’s record and selected him to be retained on active duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00097
Since he had over 19 years and 6 months of active duty service the personnel officer assured him that he would be credited with a full 20 years of service. As of 9 February 2011 the VA advised him that his disability rating had been determined to be 70 percent based on a number of factors and his VA pension would no longer be withheld from his Air Force retirement pay, however, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) did not agree and he was advised that he did not qualify for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00099
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00099 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: One of his non-selections to the rank of major on the Calendar Years 2009 (CY09) and 2010 (CY10) Line and Health Professions Nonparticipating Reserve (NPR) Major Promotion Selection Boards be expunged from his record. Both of the promotion boards on...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00100
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00106 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) failure he received on 30 Dec 11, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 2.3.2.1 states the FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00109
According to Title 10, United States Code, Section 14883, any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year of the date of the event. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant failed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00113
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00113 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) premiums be stopped. However, if the decision is to grant the re1ief sought, the member's DFAS pay record should be corrected to show that he elected to not participate in the SBP effective 22...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00114
They have no record of receiving a facsimile from the applicant and even if they had, he did not elect to add his spouse within the one year window as prescribed by Title 10, U.S.C. In view of the fact the applicant is eligible for retired pay at age 60, his spouse is eligible for an ID card, Base Exchange, and commissary privileges. In response to the Air Force OPR evaluation, the applicant raises the possibility that his change of address somehow could have caused any...