AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05964
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05964 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05967
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05967 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 30 Nov 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The medication the applicant was taking affected his heart rate, a factor that is not calculated in any FA component except the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05973
The Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) has reviewed this application and stated that the applicant may submit directly to AFCENT for a one-time reconsideration of his request. Therefore, until such time as he has exhausted all available administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief requested. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05973 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012-05430
The applicant was charged for 15 days of leave for rest and recuperation and 22 and a half days of leave were accumulated while deployed; however, it was not designated as being tax exempt. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends restoring the 15 days of accrued leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records relating to the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1982-02842-1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1982-02842-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 20 Jul 83, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1984-02252-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1984-02252 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit I, with attachments. In addition, we considered his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1986-01455; BC-1996-00399
His records be corrected to reflect he was retired for physical disability for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or major depression, rather than discharged for a personality disorder. Dr. A provides a separate opinion in the applicant’s case, concluding the applicant does not have a personality disorder, and never had a personality disorder. In fact, contrary to the circumstances in the noted case, Counsel has argued that the applicant’s service over the course of the years...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1986-01455; BC-1996-00399
Dr. A provides a separate opinion in the applicants case, concluding the applicant does not have a personality disorder, and never had a personality disorder. In fact, contrary to the circumstances in the noted case, Counsel has argued that the applicants service over the course of the years between his service in Vietnam and his adjustment disorder diagnosis was impeccable and has presented no evidence to indicate there were similar circumstances at play in the applicants case. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1988-03425
However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we find no evidence that a physical condition existed at the time that met the requirements for processing through the disability evaluation system; therefore, we find no evidence he would have been eligible for a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1990-02453-4
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 8 May 2006, 12 August 2011 and 13 September 2011, the applicant was notified that his requests for reconsideration were not favorably considered as he failed to submit new and relevant evidence. In support of his request, he submits a personal statement with several signatures and several...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1992-00643-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Records of Proceedings at Exhibit G. Based on the available evidence of record, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended the applicant be permanently retired with a compensable disability rating of 40 percent. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1999-00390-2
BC-1999-00390, the applicant requested that his record be corrected to reflect that his compensable disability rating of 60 percent be changed to 75 percent on the basis of unemployability. He maintains that these findings should have been reflected in his Air Force medical evaluation for permanent and total disability and should have been separately rated at the PEB. The applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1999-02707
The SSBs for CY1998A and CY2000A promotion selection boards were comprised of the same officers in violation of 10 USC 612(b) and AFI 36-2501, Officer Promotions and Selective Continuation, which indicates that an officer cannot serve as a member of two successive boards considering officers of the same competitive category and grade. The applicant was non-selected for promotion by each board and was therefore considered for selective continuation by the SSB for the CY2000A board; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2003-01916-2
________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-01916 in Executive Session on 16 February 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: with Exhibits. Panel Chair Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 21 Nov 03, Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Mar 11. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant’s Member of Congress,
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2003-03035-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation of “Personality Disorder” be corrected. Despite the fact that the applicant was also given an Axis I diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder, the Consultant is of the opinion that the choice of using...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2003-03941
In addition, they found the following; 1) no convening authority may apply the conditions on suspension to the confinement element of the adjudged sentence; 2) the period of suspension of the punitive discharge and reduction in grade, during which the applicant was required to participate satisfactorily in an acceptable sex offender FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 rehabilitation program, was limited to five years; 3) involuntary appellate leave was to be applied to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2005-03883-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. Through his Member of Congress, the applicant requested that additional information be considered in his case to have the contested report removed. Further, while the applicant may disagree, in our view, it appears that the comments in the additional documents indicate not that feedback was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2006-03331
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03331 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program for his medical conditions associated with his foot, knee, shoulder, neck, ribs, and wrists. Compensation ratings Special (CRSC) d. Has qualifying disability The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2009-00052-3
A correct diagnosis of dysosmia and loss of taste be rendered at the time of his medical discharge of 9 August 1972. In our previous review of this issue we agreed with the recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant to deny the requested relief and adopted his rationale as the basis for our decision the applicant was not the victim of error or injustice. In regards to this issue we concur with the evaluation previously prepared by AFPC/DPSDD that based on the evidence of record the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2010-02260
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2010-03242
The Squadron Commander advised him that she would be recommending his separation from the Air Force. After thoroughly conducting our independent review of the evidence of record, to include the responses to the applicant’s two separate IG complaints, and noting his contentions, we are not persuaded that he was discharged based on his permanent PRP decertification. Contrary to the applicant’s assertion, the decision to discharge him was based on a force management decision rendered by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-00179-2
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-01526
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her great-uncle is entitled to the requested awards and decorations because he was assigned to the 724th Ordnance Company, 24th Pursuit Group, Far East Air Force, while assigned to the Philippines and participated in the Battle of the Points. According to Air Force Pamphlet 900-2, dated 15 June 1971, the former member’s group of assignment, i.e., 24th Pursuit Group, is entitled to three DUCs for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-01967-2
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-02048
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02048 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Saudi Arabia. The Board notes that the Air Force office of primary responsibility states they could not confirm any time served...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-02444
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02444 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect that he is entitled to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service in Vietnam. The AFEM may be awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who after 1 July 1958: participate as members of U.S. military units in a U.S....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-02673
The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-02981
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02981 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: XXXXXXX _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Government honor the contract he signed with them for a personally procured move (PPM) at the estimated rate of $13,565.34. _______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Personal Property Advisory...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03286
Office of the Assistant Secretary DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2011-03286 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03498
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Senior Medical Advisor, recommends denial and states, in part, that at the time of the MEB the applicant did not meet qualifying requirements for processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES), i.e., 20 years of service computed under 10 USC 1208 and an unfitting disability of at least 30 percent that was incurred in the line of duty. There is also no evidence to reflect his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03648
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03648 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation be changed from “Defective Enlistment Agreement” to “Medical Separation.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The basis for his discharge was a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03684
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s DOR was originally established incorrectly by AFPC and corrected in accordance with the provisions of AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank. An audit of officer...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03824-1
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2011-03824 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03855
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03855 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 2 Nov 12, a request for information pertaining to his post- service activities was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03880
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03880 COUNSEL: XXXXX IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was rated 70 percent for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and permanently retired by reason of physical disability,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04053
His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart (PH). DPSIDR indicates that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel records, they were unable to locate a certificate or special order verifying he was awarded the PH. He is not sure which incident was referenced in the letter he received in 1962 indicating he was awarded the PH for “above and beyond the call of duty.” The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04130-2
The second circumstance for removal arises when the question of interest, specifically, will the best interest of the Air Force be served by removing the Article 15 from the service member's record. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04143
The Medical Consultant states the applicant's request for a change from a 30 percent to a 100 percent disability rating with medical retirement must be considered in view of the medical evidence available at the time of separation from active duty service and release from the TDRL. Hence, the Medical Consultant identifies no medical basis for the recommendation to retroactively assign a 100 percent disability rating for the applicant's ulcerative colitis. After thoroughly reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04213
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Although his father was recommended for the DFC, which was approved by the squadron through group levels, Fifth Air Force, did not act on the recommendation due to the wars closure. Although the applicant provides signed recommendation, he provides no proposed citation or evidence the recommendation was approved. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04220 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries he received in an automobile accident while on temporary duty (TDY) in Feb 1951. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04247
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was denied reenlistment due to his medical condition, i.e., lower back pain, which was sustained while on active duty during a deployment and was told that he was not fit to fight. Despite the fact that two separate Medical Evaluation Boards (MEBs) recommended that he be returned to duty he was not allowed to reenlist. As indicated above, although he was twice processed through the Disability...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04279
DPSID states the applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board’s (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-240l, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. DPSID states, that in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the rater did follow all applicable policies and procedures in the preparation and completion of the contested evaluation. It appears the report was accomplished in direct accordance with applicable Air 4 Force instructions.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04636
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Article 15 received on 4 February 2011, be set aside and his rank to staff sergeant (E-5) be restored. At the time the Article 15 was offered, the applicant had an opportunity to address his commander and present similar reference letters. DPSOE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04979
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04979 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the ICM. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04982
The applicant received a letter of reprimand and an Unfavorable Information File for the substantiated misconduct. Nor has the applicant provided any documentation to refute the findings of the CDI. Based on AFPC/DPSID’s recommendation to deny the applicant’s request to void the OPR, it is also recommended his request for a special selection board be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04989
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04989 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. A physical lesion was not required, provided the concussion or other form of injury received was due to direct enemy, opposing armed force, or hostile foreign force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05022
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. Although the applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to general, based on the repeal of DADT, the Department of Defense issued policy guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05023
However, they were married on 3 Jan 2011. In order for a spouse, who married a member after his/her retirement, to be considered eligible for the SBP annuity, the post-retirement marriage must endure for one full year from the date of marriage. Although the applicant provides evidence that recognizes their relationship as a marriage, the law requires a member to be married for one full year before the widow is eligible for SBP payments, assuming the member...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05034
Following a review of all available facts and evidence in the case, to include the testimony presented before the FPEB, the remarks by 2 the FPEB, IPEB, the service medical record, and the narrative summary of the MEB, the board concurred with the disposition recommended by the two previous boards and recommended discharge with severance pay with a combined disability rating of 20 percent. DPSD states no documentation was provided at any time during the DES processing of the applicant’s...