Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00100
Original file (BC-2012-00100.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00100 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
       
 
       
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  DD  Form  214,  Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of 
Transfer  or  Discharge,  be  corrected  to  reflect  his  foreign 
service in Vietnam. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His  DD  Form  214  does  not  reflect  his  service  in  South  Vietnam 
from November 1964 to February 1965. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On  25  Sep  61,  the  applicant  contracted  his  enlistment  in  the 
Regular Air Force.   
 
The applicant’s AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, reflects the 
applicant was on temporary duty (TDY) for 99 days, but does not 
specify a location. 
 
On 24 Sep 65, the applicant was honorably discharged and credited 
with  four  years  of  total  active  service,  three  months  and  nine 
days of which was credited as foreign service. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial  noting  a  review  of  the 
applicant’s  master  personnel  records  and  the  documentation  he 
provided  does  not  substantiate  he  had  foreign  service  time  in 
Vietnam. 
 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
He served in DaNang, South Vietnam with the 4080th Armament and 
Electronics Maintenance Squadron.  His assignment was classified 
top secret and may still be classified.  Although, he received an 
Air  Force  Commendation  Medal  (AFCM)  it  does  not  reflect  the 
location for the service.  He has no records in his possession 
that will substantiate he served in Vietnam.  However, after his 
release  from  active  duty  he  received  a  Vietnam  bonus  from  the 
State of Connecticut.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  response,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit E. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After  a 
thorough  review  of  the  applicant’s  complete  submission  and  the 
evidence of record we found it insufficient to conclude that he 
served or was stationed in Vietnam.  Therefore, we agree with the 
opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary 
responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice.  Without official documentation such as TDY orders or 
vouchers, his eligibility for service credit for Vietnam service 
cannot  be  verified.    However,  should  the  applicant  provide 
documentation substantiating his service in Vietnam, we would be 
willing  to  review  the  materials  for  possible  reconsideration.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 

 

2 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00100 in Executive Session on 7 Aug 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Jan 12, w/atch. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Military Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 20 Mar 12. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 12. 
Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 3 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 

 
Panel Chair 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00845

    Original file (BC-2010-00845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available records reflect the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 19 May 66 and was honorably discharged on 9 Feb 70. The complete HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02202

    Original file (BC-2010-02202.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP further requested the applicant provide official documentation, such as, travel vouchers, evaluation reports and letters of evaluation to substantiate his Foreign Service in Spain, France and Libya. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s military personnel records do not reflect he served in Spain or Libya. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record his entitlement to Foreign Service credit for serving in Vietnam and the Philippines...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02780

    Original file (BC-2005-02780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02780 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for service in Vietnam, award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for service in Vietnam in Oct 69 and award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02058

    Original file (BC-2011-02058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, Item 2, Foreign Service Summary be corrected to reflect Da Nang AB, South Vietnam. DPAPP states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records and the documentation provided they were unable to verify Foreign Service time in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show his race...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00338

    Original file (BC-2007-00338.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00338 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 AUGUST 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1968. In support of his request, applicant provided page four of his Airman Military Record, AF Form 7, which is a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03043

    Original file (BC-2013-03043.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03043 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s master personnel records failed to provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. In view of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02338

    Original file (BC-2005-02338.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends the application be denied. DPAPP requested the applicant provide documents that would indicate his TDY to Vietnam. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03636

    Original file (BC-2011-03636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reflect foreign service in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation he submitted failed to provide any documents to substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add the VSM to his records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...