AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05068
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Block 17, with a separation date of 31 October 2011, of the DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
issued in conjunction with his 1 November 2011 retirement, be
changed from “yes” to “no”.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like to take advantage of his Veteran Affairs (VA)
dental benefits because he chipped his front tooth, which
happened one month after he retired. He would like to have it
repaired before it gets worse.
The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation.
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force on 1 Nov 11.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAMD recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214, Block
17, is marked “yes” indicating he was provided a complete dental
examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment
within 90 days prior to separation. Additionally, the Veterans
Outpatient Dental Treatment for Discharged or Released Personnel
letter was completed on 5 Jul 11 and was signed by the applicant
and the dental representative. The letter states the member has
been provided a dental examination and appropriate dental
services were provided to him within the 90-day period prior to
his discharge.
The complete DPAMD evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 1 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-05068 in Executive Session on 7 Jun 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
2
The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011-
05068 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Dec 11.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAMD, dated 13 Feb 12, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Mar 12.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02718 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, states item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member's continuous active military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04482
Block 17 be changed to indicate he was not provided all appropriate dental services prior to separation. On 8 Nov 12, AFPC/DPSIT directed the applicants DD Form 214, Block 14, Military Education, be changed to reflect (IVK) Underwater Egress Training, Nov 2008. On 23 Jun 13, SAF/MRBR directed the applicants DD Form 214, Block 20, Member Requests Copy 6 be Sent to California Director of Veterans Affairs, be changed to reflect No. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03555
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be corrected to amend Block 16, Days Accrued Leave Paid, to reflect 60 rather than 0. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03455
The applicant has requested correction of several items on her DD Form 214. We note the applicant was advised in a letter, dated 13 October 2011, by AFPC/DPSOY that block 17 has been corrected to reflect that the applicant was provided a complete dental examination. This should satisfy the applicants request for correction of block 20a, Member Requests Copy 3 Be Sent to the Central Office of The Department of Veterans Affairs. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...
Applicant’s request, with a statement from a dentist who accepted his commission at the same time as the applicant, is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Dental Corps Utilization and Education Branch, AFPC/DPAMD, reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating the applicant was given the opportunity to accept a three-year commission without a bonus or opt to accept the accession bonus which commits him for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01276
AFPC/DPAMF2 noted that the applicant further cited a fifty-seven year old accession that he is aware of who had completed two years of active duty, separated, and was to return as a lieutenant colonel in Fiscal Year 2002 (FY02). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPOC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRRP reviewed this application and indicated that the United States Code (USC), Title 10, Section 8911, provides that the Secretary of the Air Force may, upon the officer’s...
His Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2000A (CY00A) (6 Nov 00) Colonel Dental Corps (DC) Central Selection Board be corrected to include his certificate of board certification (which has since been corrected), previous Army duty history, Professional Military Education (PME) (which has since been corrected) and decorations. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPPOO also reviewed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that on 31 Jul 07, he was released from active duty and retired in accordance with the provisions of 10 USC Section 1251, rather than being transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Therefore, the applicant submitted a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02803
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02803 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Prior to his discharge, the applicant was provided a complete dental examination; however, all appropriate dental services and treatment were not provided by the Air Force within 90 days of his separation. Therefore, in order to preclude a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02259
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the administrative adjustment of the applicant's AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of the USAF Physical Evaluation Board, to reflect his thyroid condition was considered by the IPEB, but with denial of its inclusion as an unfitting condition in the military disability rating computation; neither initially or at the time of his removal from the TDRL. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants...