Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05071
Original file (BC-2011-05071.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
 
 

 

 

 
AFBCMR BC-2011-05071 
 
 
 
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR 
 
SUBJECT:  XXXXXXX 
 
 
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale expressed as the basis for our 
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice.  Therefore, we 
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: 
 
 
XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to reflect that on October 15, 1970, he was honorably 
discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 1.2, “Secretarial Authority” with a 
separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 1. 

Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendations of the 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to 

Members of the Board, XXXXXXX, considered this application on September 25, 2012. 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attachments: 
Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated June 5, 2012 

  
Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01423

    Original file (BC-2012-01423.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01423 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: XXXXXXX ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For this action he received an Article 15, dated 16 Sep 1991. On 7 Feb 1992, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02609

    Original file (BC-2012-02609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States – Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his service time in Vietnam or Thailand. Although he has been unable to provide copies of the travel vouchers for these TDYs, in view of the fact the foreign service documented on his DD Form 214 exceeds his tour length in Taiwan, as confirmed by the OPR, by 3 months and 21 days, we find the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240

    Original file (BC-2012-02240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02636

    Original file (BC 2012 02636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA). The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775

    Original file (BC 2012 01775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02069

    Original file (BC 2012 02069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2012-02069 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03017

    Original file (BC 2012 03017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her narrative reason for separation does not have an effect on her RE code, as her RE code is driven by her involuntary discharge and honorable character of service. However, by a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of a change to the reentry code. AFPC/DPSOR has admitted that her discharge reason for separation and the corresponding separation code should be corrected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02001

    Original file (BC 2013 02001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02001 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In the letter he expresses his opinion, explaining how his medical condition and pride of admitting his physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05582

    Original file (BC 2012 05582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2012-05582 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01407

    Original file (BC 2013 01407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Standard FM 600, Record of Medical Care, dated 1 Nov 2012, indicates the applicant visited the Medical Treatment Facility, “for chest pain and shortness of breath.” His medical provider diagnosed him with “Acute Bronchospasm, secondary to overexertion in a cold environment with a documented sinus infection.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, dated 26 June 12, paragraph 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have...