Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00049
Original file (BC-2012-00049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00049 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
COUNSEL:  NONE 
   
 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 
   
 
______________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Transfer  of  Education  Benefits  (TEB)  application  be 
approved. 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
The  reason  his  TEB  application  was  disapproved  was  “Service 
Member (SM) has not committed to the required additional service 
time.”    At  the  time  he  applied  (11  December  2009)  he  was  not 
directed or informed about having to sign the AF Form 4406 Post-
9/11  GI  Bill  Transfer  of  Education  Benefits  Statement  of 
Understanding to complete the application process.  The web site 
he  visited  only  had  a  check  box  to  indicate  he  understood  the 
additional service time requirement and nothing more.  He never 
received  an  email  stating  an  “AF  Form  4406  is  ready  for 
signature”  or  any  other  correspondence  indicating  his 
application  was  disapproved.    He  was  under  the  impression  that 
his TEB request was complete until he discovered the milConnect 
website on 10 November 2011.   
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
milConnect  Transfer  of  Education  Benefits  screen  print  stating 
disapproval  of  his  TEB  request  and  a  copy  of  the  Veterans 
Affairs  (VA)  Educational  Benefits  Brief  dated  2 April 2009; 
absent any mention of the AF Form 4406.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  in 
the grade of Lieutenant Colonel with an effective Date and date 
of rank of 1 August 2007.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIT  recommends  denial.    DPSIT  states,  the  Department  of 
Veterans  Affairs  (DVA),  Department  of  Defense  (DoD),  and  the 
military  services  widely  publicized  the  Post  9-11  GI  Bill  and 
the transferability feature to make sure every eligible service 
member  understood  the  process  for  transferring  benefits.    The 
Transfer  of  Benefits  (TEB)  system  began  accepting  applications 
as  of  27  June  2009,  with  an  effective  date  no  earlier  than 
1 August 2009.   
 
The applicant submitted his TEB application on 14 December 2009.  
His  request  was  received  from  the  AFPC  Service  Center  with  a 
detailed  explanation  of  what  needs  to  be  completed  by  the 
member.    On  19  January  2010,  a  notification  was  sent  to  the 
applicant  stating  that  his  application  had  expired  because  the 
statement of understanding (SOU) was not signed.  The applicant 
did not contact the AFPC Service Center until 8 November 2011 to 
inquire about his application being disapproved.   
 
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On  4  November  2011,  a  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  To date, this office has not received a response.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough 
review  of  the  evidence  of  record  and  applicant's  submission,  we 
believe that relief is not warranted in this case.  Therefore, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office 
of  primary  responsibility  (OPR)  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the 
basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of 
an error or injustice.  In view of the above and in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 

 

 
2 

 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00049 in Executive Session on 13 September 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  record,  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 December 2011. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 17 February 2012. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 March 2012. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 
3 

INITIALS  DATE 

________  ________ 

DOCKET NO: 
BC-2012-00049 

 
                   AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION 
                        OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
               CASE TRANSMITTAL / COORDINATION RECORD 
 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
XXXXXXXXXX 
 
 
MCD:  5 November 2012 
 
 
ROUTE IN TURN  
 
 
1.  CHIEF EXAMINER  
    (Coord/Signature) 
 
 
2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/ 
    DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 
    (Coordination) 
 
 
3.  EXAMINER FOR DISPATCH 
 
 
4.  XXXXXXXXXX 
    PANEL CHAIR 
    (Signature on Proceedings) 
 
 
7.  EXAMINER 
 
 
4.  AFBCMR (Processing) 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   DEBORAH F. DAVIDSON 
                                   Examiner 
                                   Air Force Board for Correction  
                                   of Military Records 
 
 

________  ________ 

________  ________ 

________  ________ 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 

 

 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03716

    Original file (BC 2014 03716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant states he did not receive email communication from the TFSC, the message presented to the applicant during the TEB application process states that completion of the TEB SOU was a mandatory requirement for TEB approval. Additionally, the applicant was provided an opportunity to validate his email address on record to ensure he would receive TEB communication from the TFSC during the application process. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03211

    Original file (BC 2014 03211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits the 17 Jul 13 e-mail from the TFSC stating that his application was rejected; a print-out from the milConnect website showing that he applied for his benefits in Aug 11 and inputted a request to transfer months of his benefits to his dependents; an AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Air Force, which validates that he extended in order to qualify for TEB transfer; and an unsigned SOU. While the applicant did complete an extension for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233

    Original file (BC 2013 05233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04365

    Original file (BC 2013 04365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding (SOU) and AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF) Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve) Air National Guard (ANG). Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02724

    Original file (BC 2013 02724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 10 Feb 2011, he applied and received approval for Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). * For those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 Aug 2009, and before 1 Jul 2010, no additional service is required. Additionally, when the applicant applied through MilConnect, there would have been a message from his service component stating that his TEB is not final until AF Form 4406,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03431

    Original file (BC 2013 03431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once he was notified, he immediately requested and filed for the date of his service commitment to be adjusted to the original request date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. Prior to accessing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03064

    Original file (BC 2013 03064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted the application to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 18 January 2011. The SOU was never received. The applicant was sent an email on 19 January 2011 requesting his signature on the SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00300

    Original file (BC 2014 00300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00300 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The effective date of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) transfer be changed to 1 Feb 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04869

    Original file (BC 2013 04869.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In many cases, the AFPC advisory opinions for those cases use words that match the verbiage in the AFPC advisory opinion on his case. He visited the Air Force Education Center in person to complete the transfer application. He believes the procedures regarding how members transfer benefits have changed from the date he executed his transfer in November 2010.