AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05123
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).
2. He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award w/Valor
(AFOUA w/V).
3. He be awarded the Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
(ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED)
4. Three Bronze Service Stars be added to his Vietnam Service
Medal. (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED)
5. He be awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon
(SAEMR).
6. He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross w/
Palm. (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED)
7. He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
(ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED)
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should be awarded the BSM for his actions on 15 January 1969.
On 15 January 1969, North Vietnamese successfully blew up a fuel
storage area and ignited 90,000 gallons of fuel. As a result of
the extreme fires, the only fuel left to fuel the planes were in
15,000 gallon gas trailers which were situated in the middle of
the burning fuel dupe. Those trailers were being used to refuel
at the fuel storage and were inoperable.
A group of men from the Transportation Squadron ran into the
fire and saved the trailers by making them operable. This
entailed them to crawl under the tankers to release the air
brakes with everything around them on fire and exploding
incoming rockets. They also had to haul the trailer out of the
fire under these extreme circumstances. Several of the
participants were honored with the Bronze Star with Valor.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the Transfer Report of Transfer or
Discharge, witness statements, a Combat Operations After Action
Report and other supporting documentation.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 July 1968.
He departed for Pleiku Air Base Vietnam on 5 July 1969 and
remained there until 1 December 1969. The applicant was
honorably discharged on 30 June 1972 and credited with serving
3 years, 11 months and 29 days of active duty service.
The remaining relevant facts are pertaining to the application
are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office
of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the Bronze Star Medal, Air
Force Outstanding Unit Award w/ Valor and the Small Arms Expert
Marksmanship Ribbon.
They were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the Air
Force Achievement Medal, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam
Service Medal with Three Bronze Service Stars, Republic of
Vietnam Gallantry Cross w/ Palm and the Republic of Vietnam
Campaign Medal. His records were administratively corrected.
The BSM is awarded to a person in any branch of the military
service who, while still serving in any capacity with the Armed
Force of the United States on or after 7 December 1941, shall
have distinguished themselves by heroic or meritorious
achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial
flight, in connection with military operations against an armed
enemy. Additionally, the BSM is limited to members of the Armed
Forces who are in receipt of special pay at the time of the
event or who receives such pay as a result of those events.
The applicant received an Air Force Commendation Medal for
meritorious service for his 10 month tour in Vietnam, however,
no official recommendation within the chain of command, no
proposed citation, or special orders were provided for the BSM
to commemorate the heroic initiative of the applicant on
15 January 1969.
2
The applicant has provided three witness statements as
recommendation for the BSM. Each witness attests to the
applicant saving motorized equipment. One of the witnesses was
awarded the BSM with Valor for the incident. The applicant’s
paid voucher shows he arrived in Vietnam on 7 January 1969 and
the witnesses attest the applicant arrived on the night of the
attack, 15 January 1969.
The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award is awarded by the Secretary
of the Air Force to units that have distinguished themselves by
exceptionally meritorious service or outstanding achievement
that clearly sets the unit above and apart. The 633rd Combat
Support Group, Headquarters SQ SEC received the award; however
the applicant’s records to not support he was assigned to the
Headquarters. The applicant is ineligible for the AFOUA w/V.
The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force members who, after
1 January 1963 qualify as expert in small arms marksmanship with
either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. A review of the
applicant’s record revealed no documentation designating the
award of the SAEMR.
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the
applicant on 20 March 2012, for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available
evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however,
we are not persuaded based upon the evidence presented of his
entitlement to the award of the Bronze Star Medal, AFOUA w/V and
Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. We agree with the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion
granted
already
beyond
that
relief
that
3
administratively is not warranted. While the applicant has a
commendable record of service, regrettably, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to grant the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered BCMR Docket Number
BC-2011-05123 in Executive Session on 30 August 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 12 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 23 Feb 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Mar 12.
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00813
AFPC/DPSIDR has verified the applicants entitlement to the PUC, AFOUA w/V, the RVNGC w/P, and the Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/3BSS). His DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to include these awards. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00813 in Executive Session on 2 Aug 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03628
Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) administratively corrected. The AFGCM criterion: The AFGCM is awarded to enlisted service members of the U.S. Air Force for exemplary conduct during a three year period of military service while in the active military service of the United States. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03628 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 12, under the provisions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01876
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Because he is not entitled to the VSM and his service was outside the inclusive period of the award, the applicant is not eligible for the RVCM. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) and will correct his records administratively.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02217
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 6 Aug 70, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force at the completion of his required active service. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108
Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicants official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04285
His record be corrected to reflect service in Vietman. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 February 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04351
On 11 January 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR wrote the applicant stating they were able to verify his entitlement for award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star and the RVNGC w/P while serving with the 366th Munitions Maintenance Squadron, Takhli Air Base, Thailand, from 24 August 1972 to 4 October 1972; and, that his record would be corrected to reflect these awards. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03600
However, the Air Force will not include the Vietnam location on his DD Form 214. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00987
Therefore, the only issue to be considered by the Board is the applicant's request regarding the SAEMR. On 12 April 2004, DPPPRA informed the applicant his records did not reflect he earned the SAEMR, nor did he provide any documentation to substantiate his claim for the SAEMR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our...