AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00084
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to meet a Supplemental Reduction in Force (RIF)
Board.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like the CY11 RIF Board to reconsider their decision to
not select him for the RIF. He was not aware that he could
write a letter to the board to request he be selected for
separation. His personal and professional desire is to leave
active duty and explore his options in the civilian sector.
However, leaving with a financial separation package would
mitigate the risk. By reconsidering him for the RIF, the Air
Force could potentially minimize the number of officers who
desire to stay on active duty that involuntarily lost their
jobs.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal
statement.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is active duty serving in the grade of major.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary
responsibility which is included in Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial. The applicant met and was
selected for retention by the L0411B, 19 September 2011, RIF
Board. The results were based on a complete review of the
applicant’s entire selection record, assessing the whole person
factors such as job performance and responsibility, depth and
breadth of experience, leadership, academic and professional
military education and distinction when rendering their
decision. The board reviewed the applicant’s record and
selected him to be retained on active duty.
The applicant contends he was not aware he could write a letter
to the board. However, the PSDM 11-21, was provided to eligible
officers with instructions attached. It clearly states that
officers meeting the board have the option to submit a letter to
the board president addressing any matter of record concerning
them that they believe warrants consideration.
The applicant stated, in a separate e-mail, that he received the
instructions and acknowledged that attachment 8 of the PDSM
addresses writing letters to the board. The applicant should
have taken the opportunity to address the RIF board prior to its
convening, not after the results were released.
The complete DPSOO evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 10 February 2012, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available
evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
2
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00084 in Executive Session on 19 June 2012 under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Aug 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 30 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 12.
Panel Chair
Member
Member
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-03144
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03144 INDEX CODE: 111.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 APRIL 2009 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for retention in the Air Force by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Reduction in Force (RIF) Board. The OPR was filed in his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02793
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends denial of his request to change his OPB to reflect select in the Developmental Opportunity block and noted the applicant is not a "Select." The complete DPAPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial, stating, in part, after careful review of his application, no evidence was found to show the applicant's nonselections for promotion to the grade of Lt Col by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03525 INDEX CODE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for retention by the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Reduction In Force (RIF) Board. He was considered and not selected for retention by the FY07 RIF board. After a thorough...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03048
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03048 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for retention by the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Reduction in Force (RIF) Board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02765
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02765 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to include his current duty title of “Chief, Wing Codes Training”, the year of completion and school name for his Bachelor's degree, and his Air Force Achievement Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02209
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02209 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to the grade of colonel/O-6. After careful review of this application, the most fair and practical remedy is to grant a special selection board by the P0610C Colonel CSB to allow the applicant the opportunity to write a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04455
Her Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 13 Sep 10 to 12 Sep 11 be included in her Officer Selection Record (OSR). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04455 in Executive Session on 16 Aug 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Nov 11, w/atchs...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00164
She be considered by the Special Selection Board (SSB) for the L0311E (9 Sep 11) Reduction-in-Force Board – administratively corrected. With regard to her contention that the Professional Military Education (PME) push line does not show that she completed PDE prior to the RIF Board convening date, DPSID states the senior rater who completed the RRF included accurate information at the time he signed the RRF. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03759
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03759 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Based upon a correction to his records, he met the L0211E Reduction-in-Force (RIF) Special Selection Board and was selected for retention. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03153
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03153 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2004B (CY04B) (P0504B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB), which convened on 12 July 2004, with inclusion of a letter to the...