AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02688
The applicant was administratively separated with an entry level separation for a mental condition that existed prior to service, that interfered with military training and was determined to be incompatible with continued military service. However, after a thorough review of the evidence presented, in particular the assessment by the Medical Consultant, we are sufficiently persuaded the applicant’s reason for separation and SPD code did not truly reflect the diagnosed condition which...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02692
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. As stated by the AFPC/DPF, JCS/JI is the approving authority for the award of the JCS Identification Badge and the Board is without the authority to award the badge. Furthermore, it appears the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JSC) Identification Badge was created after the applicant’s discharge from the Air Force and there were no provisions made to award this badge retroactively.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02694
e. His former commander’s defamatory statements resulted in his making an Air Force IG complaint alleging his former commander made false statements and that his record did not contain anything showing his conduct, performance or behavior were less than desirable. The AFBCMR Letter is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT”S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: In response to the Board’s request, the applicant indicated he...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02706
DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his spinal disc condition and knee prosthesis are not combat related. Medical documentation dated 6 Mar 57, states his injuries were incurred when he jumped off a truck. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02707
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02707 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 March 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be changed to delete a diagnosis of spina bifida occulta and indicate his back pain was aggravated by service in order to obtain Department of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02709
His commander eventually tried two times to deliver the Article 15, which included 14 days additional duty and 14 days restriction to base, but the applicant refused to accept it. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 December 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. In regard to his request for a medical discharge, the applicant has provided no...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02711
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02711 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Mandatory Case Completion Date: 4 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was entitled to incapacitation pay. The DPMB evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02714
The Government Bill of Lading (GBL) weight for moving his household goods exceeded the maximum allowable weight authorized by the Joint Federal Transportation Regulation (JFTR) allowance of 14,500 pounds There appears to be a gross weight miscalculation on the weight charged by the contract carrier. With the error of JPPSO failing to weigh his shipment, there is no way to determine the correct weight of his household goods shipment. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02716
The applicant was administratively discharged with an entry-level separation for fraudulent entry into military service for concealing a significant history of migraine headaches after his headaches interfered with military training. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02718 INDEX CODES: 100.05, 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, his promotion eligibility be reinstated so his test scores for the 03E6 cycle can be graded; he receive promotion consideration for cycle 04E6; his training status code...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02737
On 12 Dec 01, the applicant was disqualified from flying by the Air Combat Command Surgeon due to a diagnosis of narcotic abuse based on an aeromedical summary prepared by his attending flight surgeon at the time. Records reveal on 12 Dec 01 the applicant was medically disqualified by ACC/SG as requested by his flight surgeon. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit G. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the BCMR Medical Consultant provided an evaluation of the applicant’s appeal.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02738
The applicant in his statement notes that no notification of state medical boards was made at the time of his discharge. In fact, in his letter requesting resignation in lieu of court martial, he indicated he had already made arrangements for continued rehabilitation following separation. CATHLYNN B. SPARKS Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02738 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02740
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02740 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 June 1986 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02751
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial indicating they thoroughly researched the applicant’s records and provided documentation, and were unable to find the required documentation to verify his entitlement to awards and decorations for his missions in SEA. Also, his performance report reflects a mission to SEA; therefore, his contribution to the Air Evacuation Mission is documented in his records. However, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02755
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states he did file an IG complaint, which he included with his application. However, based on the applicant’s previous and subsequent performance reports,the performance feedback he received prior to the contested report, and the letter from the rater of the contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02768
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His condition is the result of many years of hazardous parachute duties in both the Army and Air Force Special Operations Forces as light infantryman on extreme training operations and exercises; and, from over 100 parachute jumps, many of which are described as "multiple hard landings." There are no records of treatment for injuries to either foot incurred as a result of parachute jumps and service...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02769
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion no change in the records is warranted. Once the applicant separated from the Regular Air Force and was transferred to the Air Force Reserves, his status changed from being a member of the active Regular Air Force, to being a member of the Reserves, a civilian who could be called to active duty. 10 Section 1201, and his Reserve duty, did in fact, aggravate his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02772
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02772 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 MAR 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the additional 10% in retired pay authorized for Airman's Medal (AM) recipients. On 10 Dec 04, The Personnel Council determined that extraordinary heroism, within the meaning of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02780
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received $100.00 at the time of his discharge but never received the additional $200.00. He did not receive the additional AM, nor did he receive the medal the crew officers recommended him for a deed up and beyond the call of duty. The applicant did not provide any documentation to support award of the AM or DFC.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02787
The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Sep 04, w/atchs. Exhibit B. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02787 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02802
He receive direct promotion to the grade of major with an effective date of rank as if he had been promoted by the CY02A (19 Feb 02) (P0402A) Major Central Selection Board (CSB); or, 2. It is DPPPE’s and DPPPO’s opinion that there is no convincing data that a material error or injustice existed in the applicant’s record; therefore, they recommend his request for direct promotion and SSB consideration be denied. Since we are unable to conclude the applicant’s record, as seen by CY02B...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02810 INDEX CODE 128.10 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A pro-rated portion (approximately $666.67) of his original enlistment bonus be refunded. Information about PALACE CHASE is provided with the applicant’s military personnel records at Exhibit B. Recommend disapproval of his request...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02812
Her record shows she completed 15 years, 10 months, and 21 days of honorable federal service as of 18 August 1993. Regarding early qualification for retired pay for members who were medically disqualified for duty, a member must have completed at least 15 years, but less than 20 years, of satisfactory federal service and been medically disqualified for military service on or after 5 October 1994. In this case she would have been eligible for a Reserve retirement at age 60 as she would have...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02816
On 30 November 1961, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. However, as of this date, no response has been received. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02817
His CRSC application was disapproved on 29 Dec 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Dec 04 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02823
The fact that the applicant has been granted service connected disability from the DVA does not entitle him to Air Force disability compensation. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 05 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02826
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The SAFPC recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that while there is little doubt the applicant demonstrated some extraordinary airmanship, decisive leadership, and heroism on 6 June 1972, for which he was awarded the DFC, the degree of heroism exhibited does not rise to the level required to merit the award of the SS. However, after a careful review and consideration of all factors...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02827
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She does not recall being informed of the requirement to decline FSGLI coverage for her spouse who was on active duty and already covered by his SGLI. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the FSGLI premiums she paid from November 2001 to September 2003. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Nov 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02831
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial noting the applicant received an entry level separation for fraudulent enlistment. An airman may be discharged for fraudulent entry based on the procurement of a fraudulent enlistment or period of military service through any deliberate material misrepresentation, omission, or concealment that if known at the time of enlistment or entry into a period of military...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02838
INDEX CODE: 131.10 BC-2004-02838 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02842
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There is insufficient evidence of a sexual relationship with SrA M__, or that he obstructed justice by allegedly asking her not to make a statement to the investigator of these charges. AFPC/DPPPE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02843
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02843 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 121.00, 126.03, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Throughout this entire process, his case was mismanaged and mishandled as evidenced by the fact his OPR, rebuttal, PIF, and proposed Article 15 action were lost...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02844
He was never informed of and there is no evidence the commander ever rescinded the initial letter of notification of processing for drug abuse with an UOTHC discharge. On 18 August 2002, military counsel responded to his commander’s notification of NJP with a memorandum denying drug use. AFI 36-3209 states “An administrative discharge board must be offered to the respondent if the recommended characterization of service in the letter of notification (LON) is UOTHC.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02848
The MCM, Part V, paragraph 4c(1)(D), states if the service member requests a personal appearance, they will be entitled to “be allowed to examine documents or physical objects against the member which the nonjudicial punishment authority has examined in connection with the case and on which the nonjudicial punishment authority intends to rely in deciding how much nonjudicial punishment to impose.” The applicant did not request a personal appearance and would, therefore, not be entitled to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02850
INDEX CODE: 131.00 AFBCMR BC-2004-02850 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02851
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 25 Sep 03, in the grade of airman basic, for a period of six years. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he interviewed for a boom operator position and was accepted. MARILYN M. THOMAS Vice Chair AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02853
On 20 Jan 00, the 8AF/CC directed the Article 15 be filed in the applicant’s HQ USAF OSR and Officer Command Selection Record. HQ ARPC/DPBS confirmed by a 10 Jan 05 email that, in fact, the applicant was considered, but not selected, by the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) major board that convened in Feb 04, as he contends in Exhibit D. Pursuant to an AFBCMR Staff inquiry, the applicant faxed copies of his 25 Aug 04 administrative attempt to have the 8AF/CC remove the Article 15 from his OSR. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02854
The applicant’s flight commander recommended the applicant be eliminated from the course and discharged from the Air Force because of his inability to adapt to requirements of the Intel career field or the Air Force. DPPRS notes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his reenlistment eligibility code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02858
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that he may have been in Korea at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he had temporary duty service to Korea for any specific dates or length of time. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, in Executive Session on 18...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02867
On 24 Feb 97, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Based on his overall record of service, the contents of the FBI...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02871
In November 2004, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) considered and denied the applicant’s request for a 10% increase in retirement pay based on receiving the SS and DFC for heroism. Review by the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC), the approval authority, determined that the increase in pay was not warranted in this case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02895
Honor board members are allowed to consider all evidence. Counsel states that the point is that Academy doctors did evaluate the applicant correctly and in a timely manner and determined he had rheumatoid arthritis, but the Academy failed to follow up with the second medical review, which was stipulated in the first review. Counsel also seeks to clarify that the applicant “never stated that he contended that the Cadet Honor Board did not properly consider his medical problems.” The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02897
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02909
In a legal review of the discharge case file dated 7 December 1987, the Combat Support Group Judge Advocate office found the file was legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, and the discharge was within the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02912
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02912 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he is not required to pay back his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02917
INDEX CODE: 131.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02920
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02920 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 MARCH 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant was sentenced to be reduced in grade to airman basic, to be confined for twelve months, and to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02925
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 Dec 82. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPWB is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 25 Mar 05 for review and response. No evidence has been...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02928
The Board recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance/exceeding weight standards with an honorable discharge, but that he be offered probation and rehabilitation opportunities with a conditional suspension of the discharge. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommended denial indicating testimony of...