Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02810
Original file (BC-2004-02810.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02810
            INDEX CODE 128.10
            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

A pro-rated portion (approximately $666.67) of his original enlistment
bonus be refunded.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He  was  informed  by  numerous  personnel  throughout  his   military
personnel flight (MPF) at Shaw AFB that he would not have a  pro-rated
portion of his original enlistment bonus taken from him  on  his  last
paycheck.  However, approximately $666.67 was taken.  Shaw AFB claimed
it was a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) error  and  the
money should be returned to his account by the end of Jul 04.  He  has
just returned to college and really needs the money.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.


_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Background:

      The PALACE CHASE program is an early release  program  affording
active duty Air Force officers and enlisted members an opportunity  to
request early separation from active duty and to serve  the  remaining
portion of their commitment in an Air Reserve Component  (ARC),  i.e.,
the Air National Guard (ANG) or the  US  Air  Force  Reserve  (USAFR).
Enlisted members must serve for  a  period  two  times  the  remaining
amount they owed on their enlistment.  The application  process  takes
approximately 7-8 weeks after HQ AFPC receives it.   Military  members
can request withdrawal of their application.

      The AFPC website provides information about PALACE CHASE.  Prior
to the Force  Shaping  Program  (see  below),  its  “Frequently  Asked
Questions” link, Question 19 asks: “If a member agrees to serve in the
ARC, are they required to  repay  the  unearned  portion  of  bonuses,
scholarships, tuition assistance?” The Answer: “Enlisted are  required
to repay unearned portion of bonuses.”  [Officers also are required to
repay unearned portions of their bonuses.]

      On 4  Feb  04,  the  PALACE  CHASE  Force  Shaping  Program  was
announced.  This program did not require recoupment of bonuses and its
purpose was to generate losses in addition  to  regular  applications.
Pursuant to an inquiry by the AFBCMR Staff, HQ AFPC/DPPRSR  informally
advised via  email  that  they  approved  approximately  725  enlisted
regular PALACE CHASE applications before and during the Force  Shaping
Phases I and II programs.  They continued to  process  regular  PALACE
CHASE applications and did not accept any Force  Shaping  applications
until 12 Mar 04, per Military  Personnel  Flight  Memo  (MPFM)  04-25,
May 04.  HQ AFPC/DPPRSR further  indicated  that  the  date  a  member
signed his AF Form 1288, Application  for  Ready  Reserve  Assignment,
determined  the  applicable  program.   MPFM  04-35,  Aug 04,  further
clarified that requests to change  previously  approved  PALACE  CHASE
packages to take advantage of the waivers  in  general  would  not  be
approved unless in the Air Force’s best interests.  Information on the
Force Shaping Phases I and II as well as the MPFMs are also  available
on the AFPC website.

Information about  PALACE  CHASE  is  provided  with  the  applicant’s
military personnel records at Exhibit B.

                                   ------

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force  on  9 Jun  99  for  a
period of six years, giving him a date of separation  (DOS)  of  8 Jun
05.  He received an enlistment bonus.  He was promoted to the grade of
staff sergeant with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 Jul 03.

On 10 Sep 03, while  assigned  to  the  15th  Air  Support  Operations
Squadron  at  Ft.  Stewart,  GA,  as  an  Enlisted   Terminal   Attack
Controller, the applicant applied, via AF Form 1288, for separation at
the earliest  possible  date  under  the  PALACE  CHASE  program.   He
requested assignment to the 165th Air Support Operations  Squadron  at
Brunswick, GA.  The applicant’s request was approved on 23 Sep 03, but
with a release date of  no  earlier  than  8 Jun  04  due  to  manning
requirements, current operations, and a high demand for his Air  Force
Specialty Code (AFSC).  Special Order  No.  AA-040,  dated  6 Oct  03,
directed the applicant’s release from extended active duty,  effective
8 Jun 04, and assignment to the GA ANG.

On 3 Jun 04, the applicant signed AF Form 2631, PALACE CHASE Statement
of Understanding/Contract, and initialed Item 1.6., which reads:   “If
I have been paid a bonus, I will be required  to  repay  the  unearned
portion of the bonus prior to my separation from active duty.”

The applicant was honorably released from active  duty  on  8 Jun  04,
after five years of active service, and transferred to the GA ANG.  He
had one year left  on  his  original  term  of  enlistment  (TOE)  and
apparently a pro-rated portion of his enlistment bonus was recouped.

On 9 Jun 04, the applicant enlisted in the ANG for  a  period  of  six
years.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPRSR advises that the PALACE CHASE Force Shaping Program was
announced and approved on 4 Feb 04 to generate additional  losses  for
the Air Force.  This program did not require  recoupment  of  bonuses;
however, the applicant’s application was not  submitted  nor  approved
under that program.  Recommend disapproval of his request  for  return
of the pro-rated  portion  (approximately  $666.67)  of  his  original
enlistment bonus.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 29 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
evidence  of  record  and  the  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded the recouped  pro-rated  portion  of  his  enlistment  bonus
should be refunded.   The  applicant’s  contentions  are  duly  noted;
however, we do not  find  these  assertions,  in  and  by  themselves,
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the  Air
Force.   The  HQ  AFPC  PALACE  CHASE   website   provides   extensive
information  about  the  program,  including   a   “Frequently   Asked
Questions” link that discusses  bonus  recoupment  and  the  governing
MPFMs.  The PALACE CHASE  Statement  of  Understanding  the  applicant
signed on 3 Jun 04  indicates  his  understanding  that  he  would  be
required to repay the unearned portion  of  the  bonus  prior  to  his
separation from active duty.  Finally, his application  was  processed
and approved before the Force Shaping program, which did  not  require
recoupment, went into  effect.   In  view  of  the  above  and  absent
persuasive evidence to the contrary, the applicant has  not  sustained
his burden of  having  suffered  either  an  error  or  an  injustice.
Therefore, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the
relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 3 March 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
                 Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
                 Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02810 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Sep 04, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRSR, dated 25 Oct 04.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 04.





                                   WAYNE R. GRACIE
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01871

    Original file (BC-2005-01871.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy a personal statement, copies of AF Forms 1288 (Application for Ready Reserve Assignment) and a 29 June 2004 letter requesting a date of separation under PALACE CHASE. DPPRSR states the applicant’s AF Form 1288, dated 30 March 2004, is dated after the Force Shaping Phase I program ended. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01871 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02306

    Original file (BC-2004-02306.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should still be eligible for his ACP since he transferred to a full time position with the Air National Guard (ANG) and will be performing the same duties that qualified him for ACP on active duty. They point out that paragraph 2.2, “Recoupment,” states officers will be advised that if the SecAF approves their request for release from active duty or accepts their resignations, they may be subject...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01971

    Original file (BC-2006-01971.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He transferred into Palace chase and is performing the exact Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) that he performed for more than six years while on active duty. He served 3 years, 6 months and 27 days in the regular Air Force. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00790

    Original file (BC-2005-00790.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested a PALACE CHASE transfer from active duty approximately 9 August 2004 and enlisted in the National Guard on 5 January 2005 as outlined in the Force Shaping guidelines. Even though the evidence does not establish that the actions taken by Air Force officials were improper at the time of the applicant’s PALACE CHASE application, we find it difficult to believe the applicant would not have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01051

    Original file (BC-2006-01051.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded to the Air Force Advisory by explaining his options for early separation from the Air Force and how he arrived at his decision to separate early. The Board notes that airmen separating under the Palace Chase program incur a service commitment double that of their remaining active duty commitment. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02883

    Original file (BC 2014 02883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-3207, Separating Commissioned Officers, states the Air Force normally requires recoupment of a portion of education assistance, special pay, or bonus money received when officers separate before completing the period of active duty they agreed to serve. Further, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Memorandum, dated 29 Nov 10, directs members with an SPD Code of FGQ (Intradepartmental Transfer) are required to repay the unearned portion of the bonus. THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885

    Original file (BC-2008-02885.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02399

    Original file (BC-2012-02399.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant separated under the provisions of PALACE CHASE on 1 January 2012 with a separation program designator of KGQ – PALACE CHASE. The applicant separated from active duty via the PALACE CHASE program and the only SPD code for members separating after fulfilling their military service obligation is KGQ. The applicant separated from active duty with a debt of $2,468.98 due to an unearned portion of a bonus.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04029

    Original file (BC-2007-04029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The recoupment action of his $11,581.56, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. AFI 36-3205, Applying for the Palace Chase and Palace Front Programs, clearly states the member must repay any unearned portion of an enlistment or reenlistment bonus. The master military pay account (MMPA) shows he separated with a SPD code of KGQ which indicates the bonus is to be recouped unless he separated under Force Shaping.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01788

    Original file (BC-2003-01788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His application was processed and approved with a date of separation of 30 October 2002 and a PALACE CHASE contract expiration date of 10 March 2007. The AFPC/DPPRSP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 August 2003 for review and comment (Exhibits D). ...