AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02930 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1958 under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. Given the lack of an FBI arrest record, we would have been willing to consider the applicant’s request on the basis of clemency. Exhibit D....
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02938
If his RegAF promotion were reinstated, he would be able to stay on active duty until age 62, which would give him enough time to meet his IPZ lieutenant colonel promotion board. The applicant was not offered a RegAF appointment when he was selected for promotion to major because his 55th birthday occurs before he completes 20 years of federal commissioned service. The law clearly outlines the age requirements an officer must meet to be granted a RegAF appointment.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02938A
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 11 Jan 05, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request as stated above (Exhibit E). The applicant provided an electronic copy of the Act and refers the Board to Section 531, “Transition of active-duty list officer force to a force of all regular officers.” The applicant opines that the intent of the act is to make all officers on the active-duty list regular officers and that the section of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02939
His CRSC application was disapproved on 25 Mar 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his neurosis and paralysis of ulnar nerve are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02942
The MEB referred the case to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on 26 Sep 00. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant notes the applicant’s service medical records do not show complaints of headache or dizziness after Feb 00, nearly a year before his separation, and he denied significant problems with these symptoms during an Apr 00 exam. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02947
It is further recommended that his record, to include the attached Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, signed by Colonel Close, be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the FY05 Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel PV Promotion Selection Board, and if recommended for promotion by the SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02949
The MEB recommended the applicant to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 July 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. Applicant has provided no persuasive evidence that her medical condition was improperly rated and processed at the time of her...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02954
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant’s review of the available documentation both in the service medical record and from that given by the applicant show the applicant was successfully treated for panic disorder throughout his 9 year period of active service from August 1987 to 30 September 1996. He contends the BCMR Medical Consultant’s statement that “There is no evidence that shows a referral for disability...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02956
The reason for the proposed action was that a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) on 15 Feb 95, found the applicant did not meet medical standards to join the Air Force due to recurrent, existed prior to service (EPTS), left shoulder strain. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02959
DPPPWB indicates current Air Force promotion policy dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close out date of the decoration must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD), and the date of the DÉCOR-6, Request for Decoration Printout (RDP), must be before the date of selections for the cycle in question. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He indicates that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02963
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02963 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Corrective action be taken to reflect he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02968
Her personality disorder, the primary diagnosis, was considered unsuiting for military service warranting administrative discharge from the Air Force. The applicant was administratively discharged for unsuitability due to personality disorder. Review of the mental health memorandum and personnel record does not disclose any evidence to support correction of records from an administrative discharge for personality disorder to another reason.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02984
On 28 November 1995, in her subsequent clemency petition to the convening authority, applicant asked that he set aside her conviction or at least set aside her bad conduct discharge. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 23 October 1996 and received a bad conduct discharge in the grade of airmen basic. ALSA/JAJM complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 July...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02986
The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) was convened on 22 March 1990 and concluded her condition, Bipolar Disorder, manic, moderate, acute, with considerable impairment of social and industrial adaptability, existed prior to service without service aggravation and recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that evidence of the record indicates...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02987
He was eventually promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel, Air Force Reserve, on 1 Jul 69. The applicant had ample opportunity during his long service in the Reserves to see that the best records showed his rank as 2LT and to request correction in time to affect subsequent promotion boards. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02995
The applicant was referred for disability evaluation and referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) The MEB narrative summary, dated 23 July 2003, concluded the applicant’s knee pain was incompatible with his current job but suggested retraining into a less strenuous career field. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02997
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02997 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 MARCH 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code of “JFL” and reenlistment eligibility (RE) of “2Q” be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist. The MEB recommended referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03000
AFBCMR BC-2004-03000 (Case 3) Index Code: 128.14 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03001
He was told he had saved the corporal’s life and he was going to be recommended for a medal for his actions. Based on the loss of the applicant’s records and in the absence of official documentation pertaining to the applicant’s service or the alleged events cited as a basis for his request for a medal, no advisory opinion was prepared in this case. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03003
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAEQ evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 14 Jan 05 for review and response. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03010
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03010 (RECON of BC-1981-02511) INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded based on clemency. A summary of the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03028
DPRFQ’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for the applicant notes he has confirmed with his client the actual date on which she was erroneously released from active duty with an ongoing, unresolved medical condition that was grounds for processing her through the USAF Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) system, was 1 June 2000. A review of the evidence presented indicates the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03039
Moreover, the former spouse’s behavior in 1978 in filing a DIC claim was totally contrary to her present claim, i.e., she requested death benefits as the children’s guardian-not as the former member’s spouse. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommended denial and stated that the former member’s spouse did not provide any evidence in her petition to the AFBCMR that her divorce from the former member was fraudulent. Other than...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03043-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03043 INDEX CODE: 102.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 MARCH 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his Regular Air Force (RegAF) appointment be reinstated as an exception to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03044
His CRSC application was disapproved on 12 Aug 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. No evidence was provided to indicate his service in Thailand was the direct cause of his disability. Under CRSC the disability does not to be directly from combat but from serving in a hazardous area related to the combat zone.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03050
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03050 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 01 APRIL 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03053
On 9 July 1981, he failed to report at the scheduled time to his appointed place of duty, for which he was counseled on 9 July 1981. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 October 2005 for review and response within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03054
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03054 INDEX NUMBER: 131.01; 111.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY03A (8 Jul 03) (P0503A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03064
In a Physical Examination for Flying, dated 3 January 1945, completed following the applicant’s return from overseas, it was indicated that the applicant had “no injuries, illnesses or operations while in military service.” The applicant’s Certificate of Service, documenting his relief from active duty on 5 October 1945, indicates he sustained no wounds in action. The Purple Heart Review Board concluded that the evidence presented by the applicant did not meet the criteria for award of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03065
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03065 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. The applicant was found guilty of the charge of intent to defraud and wrongfully receiving services from the United States valued at $12, 485.76. On 2 September 1992, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03067
4 INDEX CODE: 102.03, 131.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 APRIL 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was selected for augmentation in the Regular Air Force and his record be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel in the primary zone. The AFBCMR has considered these previous cases: In an application dated 18 January 1965, the applicant, a captain,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03070
The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03073
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband was awarded the SS in World War II, along with other military members; however, he never received it as he was flying a mission at the time. Effective 13 May 1975, at age 60, he was authorized to receive retired pay per section 1331 and 1402, Title 10 United States Code (U.S.C. DPPPR states that the applicant has not provided any official documentation to show that her late husband...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03074
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAO advises that, since the applicant was selected by his commission source for a pilot slot during FY03 and was subsequently medically disqualified, his pilot slot was awarded to another individual from the list of AFROTC eligibles. We believe the possibility exists that, had the ETP package been forwarded in a timely manner, the applicant may not have lost his FY03 UPT slot. PEGGY E....
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03075
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Renee M. Collier, and Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt considered this application on 26 May 2005. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/JA, dtd 10 May 05 AFBCMR BC-2004-03075 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03076
There is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice in this case. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Novel, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Aug 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03080
On 27 Feb 85, the Commander, 15th Air Force, recommended the applicant’s resignation be approved and he be given a general discharge. In view of the above, the majority of the Board concludes that no basis exists to recommend favorable action on the applicant’s request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. RENEE M. COLLIER Acting Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MRB SUBJECT: AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03082
On 29 November 1995, the applicant’s commander notified him that she was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 for drug abuse. On 25 October 2000, the former member submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. DPPRS concludes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred during the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03085
A Veterans Administration Clinic Record, Neuropsychiatric Examination, dated 15 June 1950 indicated the applicant was shot down on his second mission over the North Sea and was a POW from December 1943 to May 1945 in Germany. EXAMINER NOTE: The applicant claims he was a POW; however, there is no evidence of POW status in his military records. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 December 2004.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03087
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03087 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C (involuntary separation with honorable discharge) and his narrative reason for separation be changed to enable him to enter the Army. On 28 July 2004, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03089
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03089 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 5 October 1982, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge due to his failure to perform assigned duties properly. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03090
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03090 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Army of Occupation-Germany (AOM-G) and the World War II Victory Medal (WWIIVM). His DD Form 214 further reflects he was awarded the Japanese...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03098
He contends he received an Article 15 because of his temper. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant began his regular Air Force career on 30 April 1956. After consulting counsel, he waived his entitlement to appear before a discharge review board and requested discharge instead.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03103
He contends the Excellent rating and his eventual non retention for reenlistment in the FLANG were both forms of reprisal because he had filed a Military Equal Opportunity complaint against his supervisor. DPFOC states the rating of Excellent did not seem inappropriate and since it was not written using derogatory terms it should not be considered a referral EPR as indicated by the applicant. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03113
He couldn’t tell if he or the Vietnamese soldier was bleeding. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. After a thorough review of his submission and the supporting documentation he provided, his Veterans Administration Rating Decision, which indicates his left shoulder dislocation was established as directly related to military service, this statement alone does not persuade us...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03117
The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the P0601A Colonel Board be removed from his records and replaced with the reaccomplished PRF he has provided. In this respect, we note that in accordance with the governing Air Force Instruction (AFI) in effect at the time the PRF was rendered, supporting documentation from both the senior rater and MLR president is required prior to correction of Section IV, Promotion Recommendation, of a PRF. c. We are not persuaded the MOI used...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03120
The Medical Consultant indicated the fact that the applicant has been granted him service-connected disability from the DVA does not entitle the applicant to Air Force disability compensation. The Military Disability Evaluation System, established to maintain a fit and vital fighting force can, by law under Title 10, only offer compensation for those disease or injuries which specifically rendered a member unfit for continued active service, were the cause for termination of their career,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03122
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the applicant’s request to correct her rank on her DD Form 214 be denied. Based on the above finding, and in the absence of evidence of a formal military investigation, we also believe her records should be corrected to show that she was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant effective and with a date of rank of 1 June 2004. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03123 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 09 APRIL 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed to show adjustment disorder rather than personality disorder. On 8 July 2004, applicant submitted a conditional waiver of her rights...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03133
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03133 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to reflect the award of the Silver Star Medal (SSM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...