Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02858
Original file (BC-2004-02858.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                 DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02858
                                  INDEX CODE:  110.00
                                  COUNSEL:  NONE

                                  HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, be amended to reflect his temporary duty service in  Korea.


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In 1968, he went to Kunsan, Korea for about 30 days or more.  He later  went
on to Japan, Vietnam, Clark AB PI, Okinawa, then to Norton  AFB.   He  later
reported to Travis AFB and was given 30 days of leave.

In support  of  his  application  he  submits  a  personal  statement.   The
applicant’s submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  in  the  grade  of  airman
basic (E-1) on 20 May 1964.  Records reflect an  overseas  tour  in  Vietnam
with assignment to Bien Hoa AB, Vietnam.  On 17 May 1968, the applicant  was
released from active duty for Expiration of Term  of  Service.   On  18  May
1968, he was transferred to the Air Force  Reserve  for  completion  of  his
military service obligation.  He had served 3 years, 11 months and  28  days
on active duty of  which  11  months,  and  25  days  was  foreign  service.
Effective 19 May 1970, he  was  honorably  discharged  from  the  Air  Force
Reserve.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends the application be denied.  DPAPP states there are  no
TDY orders,  travel  vouchers  or  any  other  documents  that  support  the
applicant’s claim  he  served  in  Korea.   DPAPP  requested  the  applicant
provide documents that  would  indicate  his  TDY  to  Korea.   He  did  not
respond.  The DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  5  Nov
04 for review and response.  As of this date, this office  has  received  no
response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  Applicant’s contentions  are  duly  noted;
however,  we  do  not  find  these  uncorroborated  assertions,  in  and  by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the  rationale  provided  by
the Air Force.  While the possibility exists that he may have been in  Korea
at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating  he  had  temporary
duty service to Korea for any specific dates  or  length  of  time.   Absent
such evidence, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force  and  adopt
the rationale expressed as the basis for our  decision  that  the  applicant
has failed to sustain his burden that either an error or  an  injustice  has
occurred.  Therefore, we find no basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application,   in
Executive Session on 18 January 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Lanny Cawthon, Member
                 Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Member



The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
BC-2004-02858:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Sep 04 w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 28 Oct 04 w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Nov 04.




                                   ROBERT S. BOYD
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00144

    Original file (BC 2014 00144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect he served in Korea. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Mar 14, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295

    Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504

    Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03565

    Original file (BC-2011-03565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03565 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his Temporary Duty (TDY) assignments to Korea in November 1972 and Vietnam from January to February 1973. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available evidence of record in judging the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00730

    Original file (BC-2006-00730.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01274

    Original file (BC-2012-01274.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR states based on the applicant’s duties and responsibilities as an aircraft mechanic, his duty location (Okinawa, Japan), and the fact his DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the VSM and RVCM, the likelihood of his having served in direct support of military operations supporting Vietnam is highly likely. This document is not inherently part of Air Force members’ personnel records; therefore, this documentation is not always...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365

    Original file (BC-2010-04365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02734

    Original file (BC-2008-02734.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02734 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Service member must have been assigned, attached or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...