RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02851
INDEX CODE: 112.05
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 July 2006
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His date of enlistment (DOE) be adjusted to reflect 1 Oct 03,
rather than 25 Sep 03, which would qualify him for the Air Force
Reserve Enlisted Bonus Program and promotion to airman first class.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He wanted to wait to enlist in Oct 03, but his recruiter assured
him that if Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 1A2X1 was on the bonus
list on 1 Oct 03, it would be retroactive to his enlistment on
25 Sep 03. Additionally, when his recruiter made this statement,
the officer that took the Oath of Enlistment was present. He
states that he lost out on the bonus and his airman first class
stripes.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement;
a statement from the loadmaster superintendent and other supporting
documents.
Applicant’s complete submission is Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 25 Sep 03, in the
grade of airman basic, for a period of six years. He is currently
assigned as a loadmaster apprentice and serving in the grade of
airman first class, with a date of rank of 1 Jul 05.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRS/RSS reviewed this application and recommended denial based
on a review of the documentation provided by the member and
additional documentation obtained by the recruiting operating
location where the recruiter was assigned. After reviewing
processing documentation maintained in the database by recruiting,
there is evidence that the recruiter contacted several units in
attempts to locate the applicant a position in the loadmaster
career field which was the applicant’s second choice. They noted
that the applicant was initially interviewed in Jan 03, and did not
enlist until nine months later.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states he interviewed for a boom operator position and
was accepted. The boom operator position came with two stripes and
a bonus, but he decided at the time he wanted to travel and being a
loadmaster would provide more opportunities to travel. He did
interview with several units and all of them accepted him for a
position except for the fact that certain units did not have any
remaining slots.
He reiterates his original contention that his recruiter misled him
into believing that his bonus would be retroactive.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice warranting a change in the
applicant’s date of enlistment (DOE). In this regard, we note that
Air Force Reserve bonus listings come out every six months with
effective dates of 1 October and 1 April. The applicant states he
knew the bonus list would be coming out on 1 October, and that he
wanted to wait until that date to enlist. However, his recruiter
assured him that if his AFSC was on the bonus list, it would be
retroactive to his date of enlistment, i.e., 25 September 2003. We
note the applicant enlisted seven days before the bonus list was
released; however, he did not report to basic training until more
than three months later (January 2004). Had there been any
question regarding the enlistment bonus being retroactive, we
believe the applicant would have delayed his enlistment until after
the list was released, rather than risk losing his eligibility by
enlisting earlier. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s
DOE be adjusted to 1 October 2003, with entitlement to applicable
benefits under the Air Force Reserve Enlisted Bonus Program.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he enlisted in the
Air Force Reserve on 1 October 2003, rather than 25 September 2003,
in the grade of airman first class rather than airman basic, for a
period of six years; and at the time of his enlistment on
1 October 2003, he was eligible for entitlements under the Air
Force Reserve Enlisted Bonus Program.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2004-02851 in Executive Session on 11 August 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair
Ms. Sue A. Lumpkins, Member
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Aug 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/RSS, dated 8 Jun 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jun 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Jul 05.
MARILYN M. THOMAS
Vice Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02851
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that he
enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 1 October 2003, rather than 25
September 2003, in the grade of airman first class rather than
airman basic, for a period of six years; and at the time of his
enlistment on 1 October 2003, he was eligible for entitlements
under the Air Force Reserve Enlisted Bonus Program..
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00617
The applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to support her contention that she should have enlisted as an airman first class (E-3). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 May 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03223
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicants enlisting as a prior service member must enlist at the grade held highest at their time of discharge, in this instance, the grade of E-1. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. John E. Pettit, Member Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Nov 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01334
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01334 INDEX CODE: 112.07 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 OCT 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her enlistment contract be corrected to reflect an enlistment grade higher than airman basic (E-1). RSS states based on the information they have reviewed;...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01418
[Examiner’s Note: AFPC has administratively corrected the applicant’s record to reflect four awards of the AFAM] He be promoted to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt) as if selected during cycle 03E7. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the primary basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01536
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Base on available records, the applicant, was an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) enlisted member with 17 years of satisfactory federal service. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPM reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating, in part, applicant states he completed all...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02116
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She enlisted into the Air Force Reserve on 20 February 2002 in an Air Force Specialty (AFS) that is authorized a bonus. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 August 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, Air Force Specialty...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03901
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of the Article 15 imposed on 1 March 2002, the nonrecommendation for promotion letter, copies of two Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs), promotion recommendations to the grades of airman and airman first class, and a letter of recommendation from his current commander. On 30 March 2004, the commander recommended him for promotion to the grade of airman and airman first class, effective 1 September 2002 and 30 July 2003, respectively. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01110
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01110 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Oct 06 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his records be corrected to reflect that he was released from active duty rather than discharged and that his reenlistment eligibility...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-01 102 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: the Departmencof the Air Force relating d to show that, on 2 March 1996, he enli aiman basic (E-l), with an effective date and a date of rank of 2 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01677
The Board noted that the Air Force Separations Branch was unable to determine the propriety of the separation. Nevertheless, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Reenlistments office that the applicant’s request should be granted based on the governing directive in effect at the time of his separation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.