Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02706
Original file (BC-2004-02706.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02706
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Mar 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical conditions, spinal  disc  condition  and  knee
prosthesis,  be  assessed  as  combat  related  in  order  to  qualify   for
compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While stationed in Thailand he was sent to  a  hostile  area  that  bordered
Vietnam, in what was called the Secret War.  It was while in this area  that
his injury was incurred.  His records do not provide details of  his  injury
or reflect that this is where his injury was incurred because  the  location
was classified.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application, copies of travel orders,  and  a  personal  statement.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served in the Regular Army from 15 Mar 46 through 25 Dec  48.   He
enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  on  23  Feb  50  and  was  progressively
promoted to the grade of master sergeant.  He voluntarily retired  from  the
Air Force on 31 May 67, having served 20 years and 17 days on active duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 2 Feb 04 based upon  the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show his spinal disc condition and knee prosthesis  are  not
combat related.  His records do  not  show,  while  in  service,  a  combat-
related event or events were the direct cause of his disabilities.   Medical
documentation dated 6 Mar 57, states his  injuries  were  incurred  when  he
jumped off a truck.  Injuries sustained by  jumping  off  a  truck  are  not
considered combat related.  First mention of his knee injury  dated  14  Oct
65, states he "twisted his knee 2 days ago."  There is no other  mention  of
the knee until 17 Jul 67 in which it states"   injured his left  knee  while
in Thailand in 1965 while in the Air Force."  On 21 May 75, an entry  states
"This patient gives a history of an injury to his left knee in May of  1965.
 He states that a prisoner in attempting to escape  struck  him  across  the
outer aspect of his left knee with a rifle butt  and  apparently  caused..."
Unfortunately  there  is  no  corroborating  evidence  of  the  incident  he
described in any medical documentation other than his own statement.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states his left knee was operated on in  October  1966  at  Little
Rock AFB for an injury that he received in Southeast  Asia.   The  operation
was not successful and he was transferred to  the  DVA  hospital  where  his
left knee had to be replaced  and  his  right  knee  had  to  be  eventually
replaced due to the  extreme  stress.   There  is  no  way  he  can  provide
information on the hazardous service in Laos  due  to  the  secrecy  of  the
operation.

His complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
02706 in Executive Session on 13 Oct 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Aug 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 13 Dec 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, not dated, w/atchs.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01725

    Original file (BC-2004-01725.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records and personnel files show his knee prosthesis and ankle injury are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 04 and to his counsel on 28 Jun 04, for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00763

    Original file (BC-2004-00763.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from his medical records. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force on 14 Jun 54. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00404

    Original file (BC-2007-00404.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states although his conditions have been service-connected by the DVA, CRSC criteria require documentation to support a qualifying combat-related event or events as the direct cause of the disability. Additionally, the CRSC Board noted his Impaired Hearing is considered combat-related and approved it for CRSC; however, since it is currently rated at zero percent, he will not receive compensation at this time. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03134

    Original file (BC-2004-03134.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application and documentation extracted from his DVA records. He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 31 May 71, having served 23 years, 10 months, and 29 days on active duty. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02245

    Original file (BC-2004-02245.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his knee prosthesis, duodenal ulcer, prostate gland condition, and bursitis are not combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02490

    Original file (BC-2004-02490.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02490 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, knee prosthesis, degenerative arthritis and hip prosthesis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04055

    Original file (BC-2003-04055.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His left knee condition is not considered service connected by the DVA. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04306

    Original file (BC-2003-04306.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his medical records reveals no record of such injuries, although while stationed at Kadena AB, he injured his back lifting furniture. The Medical Consultant states he asserts his back was injured during a rocket attack in Vietnam either by falling off a helicopter or when a comrade fell on his back seeking shelter. He also asserts his back and knee conditions were caused by his duties during aerial flight.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00741

    Original file (BC-2004-00741.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00741 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Sep 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, knee prosthesis (both knees), traumatic arthritis (left wrist and elbow), limited motion of wrist, and traumatic injury to the ear canals, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02455

    Original file (BC-2006-02455.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02455 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, Right and Left Knee Prosthesis and Degenerative Arthritis of the Lumbar Spine be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation...