RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02912
INDEX CODE: 128.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect he is not required to pay back his
Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has enrolled in the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps
(AFROTC) at Charleston Southern University and will be receiving a
commission in Dec 05 to return to active duty. He was advised that
since he would be coming back on active duty as a commissioned
officer, he would not have to pay back his SRB.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded
statement, supportive statements, and his separation documents.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 31 Jan 96 for a period of four years in
the grade of airman basic. He entered his last enlistment on 29 Jan
02 for a period of six years in the grade of staff sergeant, with
entitlement to a Zone A, Multiple 3.5, SRB.
An AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, dated 16 Jun
04, indicates the applicant was to be honorably discharged on 30 Jul
04, with a separation program designation (SPD) code of KGX (Officer
Training Program).
On 3 Aug 04, he requested and was approved for early separation to
participate in the AFROTC program at Charleston Southern University.
On 8 Aug 04, his separation orders were amended to reflect the
effective date of his discharge as 15 Aug 04, and his SPD code as MND
(Miscellaneous/General Reasons (Release).
Applicant was honorably discharged on 15 Aug 04 under the provisions
of AFI 36-3208 (Miscellaneous/General Reasons), with an SPD code of
MND. He was credited with 8 years, 6 months, and 16 days of active
service.
On 3 Nov 04, AFPC/DPPRSP (Separations Branch) notified the applicant
that his SPD code was changed to KND (Miscellaneous/General Reasons)
(Discharge).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS indicated that based on the documentation provided by the
applicant, his discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, and was within
the discretion of the discharge authority.
A complete copy of AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAEQ recommended denial indicating that they reviewed the
applicant’s records and the documentation provided and found nothing
to support his request. Based on his previous SPD code of “MND” and
his current code of “KND,” recoupment of his SRB is applicable.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAEQ evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response
indicating that according to the governing regulation, recoupment of
an unearned bonus is not required if the member is separated to
permit acceptance of or entry into a program leading to a commission
or warrant appointment in the same or another military service. He
has contracted to enlist in the Air Force Reserve to participate in
the ROTC program. He should not have to have his bonus recouped.
This would be a great hardship on him and his family. He is proud to
serve in the Air Force and hopes to have many more years to come.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action. The
evidence of record indicates that subsequent to his reenlistment with
entitlement to an SRB, he requested and was approved for early
separation to participate in the AFROTC program at Charleston Southern
University. Orders were prepared indicating he was to be honorably
discharged on 30 Jul 04 with an SPD code of KGX (Officer Training
Program). This code would not require recoupment of his SRB.
However, because he did not have a contract to participate in the
AFROTC program, his orders were subsequently amended and he was
honorably discharged on 15 Aug 04 for miscellaneous reasons with an
SPD code of MND, which was later administratively changed to KND.
Both codes required recoupment of his SRB. The applicant contends he
was advised that since he was coming back on active duty as a
commissioned officer, he would not have to pay back his SRB. After a
thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this case, we are
sufficiently persuaded the applicant may not have been properly
advised regarding his separation to participate in the AFROTC program.
Furthermore, it appears that the responsible AFROTC detachment failed
to appropriately route his paperwork through necessary channels. In
our view, the applicant should not have to bear the burden of an
indebtedness that undoubtedly would not have occurred had he not been
so poorly counseled or proper procedures had been followed.
Therefore, we believe any indebtedness he incurred as a result of his
separation from active duty should be remitted. Accordingly, we
recommend his records be corrected as set forth below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 Aug 04, he
applied for a remission of his indebtedness and that it was approved
by competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02912 in Executive Session on 15 Feb 05, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Mr. Robert H. Altman, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Sep 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Nov 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAEQ, dated 6 Dec 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Dec 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, applicant, dated 1 Jan 05, w/atchs.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02912
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 14 Aug 04, he applied
for a remission of his indebtedness and that it was approved by
competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01677
The Board noted that the Air Force Separations Branch was unable to determine the propriety of the separation. Nevertheless, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Reenlistments office that the applicant’s request should be granted based on the governing directive in effect at the time of his separation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01234
However, the recoupment of bonus monies is driven by the assigned SPD code. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. DFAS-POCC/DE recommends the applicant’s request to change his SPD code be denied. The applicant originally requested his RE code also be changed; however, AFPC/DPPRSP has administratively corrected his records to reflect he was issued RE code “1J.” Applicant’s contentions regarding the separation program designator (SPD) he was assigned at the time of his discharge are...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00676
Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, 20 May 94, states that item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC code (PAFSC) and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member’s continuous active military service, and for each AFSC, the title with years and months of service. The Separation Program Designation (SPD) code issued in conjunction with his 18 June 2004 release from active duty is correct; however, a majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02862
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides expanded statements, documentation pertaining to his indebtedness, previous Board decisions, and other documents associated with the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03541
DFAS-POCC/DE states the applicant was discharged with an SPD code of MND. The applicant asserts that he was told by his officers that he would not have to repay his SEB when he voluntarily submitted a request for separation under the LADSC Waiver Program. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02095
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She previously filed a complaint with the Inspector General (IG) office at her base of assignment when she separated from the Air Force regarding the requirements for repayment of SRBs and has not received a response. Although the evidence indicates the policy was properly applied in her case, it appears she believes a class of Air Force personnel, i.e., those involuntarily separated for misconduct,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01814
It is his opinion that the Air Force essentially broke their contract by forcing him to cross-train, which ultimately resulted in his separation to meet the Air Force’s force reduction requirements. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. He was subsequently released from active duty for miscellaneous/general reason after it appears he voluntarily requested separation under the Force...