AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00966
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reserve Retirement be changed to a disability separation with entitlement to disability severance pay or a disability retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00970
In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia (Southeast Asia) in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were eligible for the VSM, provided they were: 1) permanently assigned, attached, or detailed for one or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting ground (military) operations; 2) permanently assigned, attached, or detailed for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; 3)...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00973
DPTT states that in view of the fact that the decedent would have been eligible for retired pay at age 60, the applicant is eligible for an Identification Card and Base-Exchange and Commissary privileges effective 6 March 2000. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00974
Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00983
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial stating that after reviewing the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and documentation submitted, they were unable to verify any service in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00986
He was credited with 20 years, 6 months, and 16 days of active service for retirement. Should the applicant provide additional evidence to substantiate his claim, we would be willing to reconsider his appeal. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00996
He completed his CCAF degree requirements prior to retirement; however, he cannot receive his degree because of the “9A100” AFSC. He struggled as a manager because he had never been in a management position until this point. The 3 applicant requests his AFSC of 9A100 be changed to 8R000; we find the evidence provided is insufficient to recommend granting his stated request.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01012
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as indicated below: 1. On 19 Jan 82, the applicant completed the DD Form 2057, which informed her of criteria for participation in the VEAP. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01017
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. On 28 Jan 11, the applicant received pre-separation counseling and indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component (AC) Service Members that he wanted counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01019
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01019 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 25 Mar and 29 Jun 11 “Unsatisfactory” Fitness Assessment (FA) scores be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicant’s military records are...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01021
His orders should have continued for medical treatment of the injuries he incurred during his TDY to Korea. In support of his request the applicant provides copies of VA Form 10-5345, Request for and Authorization to Release Medical Records or Health Information; and AF Forms 938, Request and Authorization for Active Duty Training/Active Duty Tour. SGHI states there were no notes provided to show that the applicant followed up with his Primary Care Manager (PCM) or what the prescribed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01022
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 13 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Incorrect sit-ups (e.g., elbows do not touch the knees or thighs at the top of the sit-up, shoulder blades do not touch the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01026
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01026 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 22 February 2012 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01027
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Eight (8) days of leave be restored to his leave account. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01029
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01029 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation (SPD) code “HDG” (involuntary convenience of the Government) and her reentry (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01030
She served as a Military Training Instructor (MTI) from 4 Oct 1974 to 15 Dec 1976. The ribbon is intended for MTIs, (AFSC 8BOOO), at Air Force Basic Military Training and Air Force Officer Training School. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01031
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SGP recommends denial. The complete SGP evaluation is attached at Exhibit B. AFRC/A1K states that, absent a medical determination from an authoritative medical source validating the medical condition presented by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01032
According to a Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 14 September 2010, it was discovered the applicant had a history of Asthma, and as a result, it was recommended that he be separated from the service for this condition. On 24 September 2010, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with an entry level separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01043
We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01068
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends the application be time barred. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 May 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01072
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01072 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessments, dated 28 October 2009, 26 February 2010, 26 May 2010, 17 March 2011 and 29 July 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, based on the physician’s statements, we find the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01076
His senior rater who rendered the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) only had limited knowledge of his duty performance, contrary to the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36- 2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, paragraph 8.1.4. Additionally, the applicant provided a letter to the board with copies of his deployed Letters of Evaluation (LOEs). Additionally, the new duty information would be reflected on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) which is provided to the CSB for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01081
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Per Special Order ACD-00858, dated 26 May 2006, the deceased member was relieved from active duty and permanently disability retired effective 6 Jul 2006. The entitlement to ship HHG was exhausted when the shipments were moved to the HOS upon the member’s retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01082
DPB states, the applicant did not meet the requirement of occupying the nominated position on the PRF submission date, or before the board convened. In reference to #3(b), the letter states the PRF submission was 9 Dec 11. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented sufficiently persuasive to recommend Special Board consideration.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01083
By the 6th week, he was up to 40 push ups and 40 sit ups per day. We thoroughly considered the applicant’s complete submission and the OPR’s recommendation not to remove the fitness assessment score. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the fitness assessment score dated 29 November 2011, be, and hereby is removed from...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084
In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01086
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01086 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive service credit for the period she received Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay, 27 May 2011 through 15 October 2011 when. Her active duty orders ended on 8 May 2011 and her medical continuation (MEDCON) orders should have been effective 9 May 2011,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01088
Medical Continuation, Eligibility for Medical continuation, the ARC member will be eligible for Medical Continuation orders when an injury, illness, or disease is incurred or aggravated while serving on active duty and that condition renders the member unable to perform military duties." We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01091
In October 2011, a transaction was sent by MILPDS to the finance system to restart the SGLI premiums effective October 2005, which created the debt. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence submitted in support of his appeal, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility assessment that sufficient evidence has been provided to show the applicant’s intent to stop his SGLI. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01093
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPWC recommends approving the applicant’s request for reimbursement for all premiums paid in the amount of $100.00 as a result of the enlistment extension being processed improperly. In this respect, we concur with the Air Force office of primary responsibility opinion and recommendation that it appears reasonable to believe that the applicant declined FSGLI coverage at the time the program...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01094
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for AFBCMR BC-2012-01094 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: APPLICANT be corrected to show that he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 3 October 2010, for a period of six (6) years, with a $15,000.00 bonus entitlement based upon Air Force Reserve guidance and policy. The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097
Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01099
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01099 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE (MEMBER) (APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to show he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Unfortunately, the time provided by the laws controlling the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01101
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to establish former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR indicates that since the request...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01102
Although, his spouse had two children, he submitted a request for spouse only coverage under the SBP within the first year of their marriage. A service member, who has no eligible beneficiary at retirement, may provide coverage for the first spouse and/or child acquired following retirement. Federal law does not require a service member to have physical custody of an eligible dependent child in order to elect SBP coverage on the child's behalf.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01103
Medical Evaluation Boards (MEBs) are convened to identify and assess the possible existence of an unfitting or disqualifying medical condition. It could not be established that the applicant was unable to reasonably perform his military duties due to one of more medical conditions during his military service or at the time of his release from active duty orders. In particular, we note the statements of the Air Force OPR and AFBCMR Medical Consultant which indicate that upon redeployment to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01104
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of removing the sit-up portion of the FA. ________________________________________________________________ Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01104 in Executive Session on 27 November 2012 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01106
Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. During that time frame, many members did not receive separation counseling on the TEB requirements and missed the opportunity to submit their TEB request prior to retiring from the Air National Guard. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01108
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her record was not accurate at the time she was considered for promotion to the grade of major because it did not reflect her board certification as a Nurse Anesthetist and appropriate AFSC until after the board had met. However, the officer must submit the applicable Air Force form along with a copy of the 2 certification to the Military Personnel Section (MPS) that reflects an addition of the prefix...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01111
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed to Anchorage, Alaska. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01113
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01113 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge” be changed to a 1A which denotes “Ineligible to reenlist, but condition waived,” so that he can re-enlist in the military. Members who are involuntarily...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01114
He received 6.21 years of active duty service credit for his military service from 15 Mar 94 to 11 Aug 02, instead of 4 years, 2 months, and 14 days. Taken together, he should have had 6.21 years of additional service credit, graduated from USUHS as a Major on 10 May 06, and met the Lt Col selection board in-the-primary-zone in 2010 rather than 2011. As the applicant’s prior service overlapped with the period for which he received service credit for his advanced degree, they...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01115
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01115 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement order be corrected to include a permanent change of station (PCS) without a change of assignment in order to utilize his one move entitlement for a temporary move to Washington state, then, to his home in South Carolina. ECAF states...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01116
On 15 March 2011, The Air Force Clemency and Parole Board reviewed the applicant’s case EVALUATION 5B – Promote Ahead of Peers 3B 5B – Promote 4B and approved his return to duty, effective as soon as possible, under the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 31-205, The Air Force Correction System, paragraph, 11.6. The complete AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01117
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and discharge with entitlement to disability severance pay, effective 8 September 2010, be changed to a permanent retirement with a minimum 40 percent disability rating. The DPSD complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01118
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01118 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation in Block 28 of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to reflect he was considered for separation by a Selective Early Retirement Board (SERB) so he qualifies for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01119
The applicant concurred with his supervisor’s recommendation and stated that he would rather separate from the Air Force instead of retraining. On 16 Jan 09, the applicant received a referral enlisted performance report (EPR), for violations of Article 86, UCMJ, failing to report to duty at the prescribed time and twice failing his CDC EOC exam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01119 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01123
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01124
Although the IO found there were problems in the professional working relationships between flight members, this allegation was not substantiated. The applicant does not allege error in how the Article 15 was processed. As such, based on the authority granted to this board pursuant to Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1034, we reviewed the complete evidence of record to determine whether the applicant has been the victim of reprisal.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01129
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A statement be added to his record stating had he not become disabled, he would have had a very good chance of remaining in the Air Force for 20 years in order to qualify for Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay...