Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01032
Original file (BC-2012-01032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01032 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
      
 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
His  reentry  (RE)  code  of  “2C  –  Involuntarily  separated  with  an 
honorable  discharge;  or  entry  level  separation  without 
characterization of service,” be changed to allow him to reenter 
the military.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He admits his fraudulent entry into the Air Force was wrongful on 
his part; however, he was not aware he could get a waiver for his 
previous  medical  condition.    He  did  not  have  a  problem  with 
Asthma, and had not taken medication for many years.  He hopes 
his naïve judgment and valuable lesson learned will not prevent 
him from his dream of serving in the Air Force.   
 
The  applicant  has  not  provided  any  evidence  in  support  of  his 
appeal.   
 
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  30  August 
2010.  The applicant indicated in Item 10d of his DD Form 2807, 
Report  of  Medical  History  that  he  did  not  have,  or  ever  had 
Asthma.    According  to  a  Chronological  Record  of  Medical  Care, 
dated  14  September  2010,  it  was  discovered  the  applicant  had  a 
history of Asthma, and as a result, it was recommended that he be 
separated from the service for this condition.    
 
On 20 September 2010, his commander notified the applicant of his 
intent to recommend him for discharge for fraudulent entry under 
the authority of Air Force Program Directive (AFPD) 36-32 and Air 
Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective 
Enlistments, Paragraph 5.15.  The applicant acknowledged receipt 
and  waived  his  rights  to  consult  counsel  and  to  submit  a 
statement in his own behalf.  On 24 September 2010, the discharge 
authority  approved  the  recommended  discharge  and  directed  the 
applicant be discharged with an entry level separation.   
 

The  applicant  was  honorably  discharged  effective  28  September 
2010,  in  the  grade  of  airman  basic  (E-1).    His  DD  Form  214, 
Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active  Duty,  reflects 
his  RE  code  as  “2C”  and  a  narrative  reason  for  separation  as 
“Fraudulent Entry into Military Service.”  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSOA  recommends  denial.    DPSOA  states  the  applicant’s  RE 
Code  of  “2C”  is  required  per  AFI  36-2606,  Reenlistments  in  the 
USAF,  based  on  his  involuntary  discharge  and  uncharacterized 
service.  The applicant does not provide evidence of an error or 
injustice in reference to his RE Code.  
 
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 21 August 2012, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 

 

2

submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01032  in  Executive  Session  on  1  November  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 
The  following  documentary  evidence  was  considered  in  connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01032: 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Mar 12. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 31 Jul 12. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Aug 12. 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 

  
Panel Chair 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514

    Original file (BC-2011-02514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code “JDA,” “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and Re-entry (RE) code of “2C,” Approved Honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00422

    Original file (BC-2010-00422.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    From his time in basic training, he actually experienced repeated symptoms of asthma and had a thorough examination by Pulmonary/Allergy specialists. Based upon the applicant’s failure to disclose his prior service medical condition, his commander recommended an entry level separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02152

    Original file (BC-2010-02152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C - Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service and separation code of JDA – Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service be changed in order to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496

    Original file (BC-2011-03496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “4C” (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04894

    Original file (BC 2013 04894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04894 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) code of “JDA,” narrative reason for separation of “fraudulent entry into military service,” and reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with uncharacterized character of service) be changed to allow him to reenlist. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02760

    Original file (BC-2012-02760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged for not disclosing a history of asthma, but there is no record of asthma anywhere in his record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01636

    Original file (BC-2010-01636.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” and, his Reenlistment (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02332

    Original file (BC-2011-02332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge and the applicant's entry level service characterization. The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of his request for a change his RE code, stating, the RE code of 2C is driven by his entry level separation with uncharacterized service. On 11 Aug 2011, HQ AETC/SGPS validated the applicant's discharge processing, but state they support a change of the RE code to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04432

    Original file (BC-2010-04432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his character of service and RE code. However, barring evidence in the applicant’s enlistment documents the condition existed prior to his entrance on active duty. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04381

    Original file (BC-2010-04381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, it was discovered he had a history of migraine headaches. DPSOS states the documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for the discharge and the applicant’s entry level separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...