Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01111
Original file (BC-2012-01111.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01111 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
 
 
     
 
     
 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
His home of record (HOR) be changed to Anchorage, Alaska. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He has been a resident of Alaska since September 2004.  
 
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Leave and Earnings Statement. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant is a staff sergeant in the Regular Air Force.  His 
DD  Form  4/1,  Enlistment/Reenlistment  Document  Armed  Forces  of 
the  United  States, reflects Albrightsville, Pennsylvania as his 
home of record at the time of his enlistment.    
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial.  The applicant’s records reflect 
Pennsylvania as the state he lived in prior to entering the Air 
Force.    Additionally,  Mechanicsburg,  PA  has  been  consistently 
listed  throughout  the  applicant’s  military  records  and  was 
listed as his home of record upon enlistment into the Air Force.  
The  Joint  Federal  Travel  Regulation  for  Uniformed  Service 
Members  Appendix  A  states  the  home  of  record  is  the  place 
recorded  as  the  home  of  the  individual  when  commissioned, 
appointed,  enlisted,  inducted  or  ordered  into  a  tour  of  active 
duty.    Therefore,  the  applicant’s  home  of  record  should  remain 
Mechanicsburg, PA.   
 
The  complete  DPSIPE  evaluation,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit C. 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 11 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit  D).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  received  no 
response. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided 
no evidence which would lead us to believe the home of record or 
his  place  of  entry  currently  reflected  in  his  records  was 
incorrectly  recorded  at  the  time  he  initially  came  on  active 
duty.    Therefore,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and  recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01111  in  Executive  Session  on  21  August  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

  
  
 

 
 
 

 

2 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Feb 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 6 May 12, w/atch. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 12. 

The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  BCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01111 was considered: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04328

    Original file (BC-2012-04328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Elizabethtown, PA as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. EXAMINERS NOTE: The applicant states his HOR reflects Elizabethtown, CA; however, it was confirmed that his records reflect Elizabethtown, PA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00367

    Original file (BC-2012-00367.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00367 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to El Paso TX. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the applicant's request to change her HOR from Philadelphia, PA to EL...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03907

    Original file (BC-2012-03907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects East Tawas, MI as her home of record at the time of her enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018

    Original file (BC-2012-04018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04350

    Original file (BC-2011-04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from New Jersey to Texas. DPSIPE states the member's initial DD Form 4 reflects Wrightstown, New Jersey as the city/state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout her military records as her HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00533

    Original file (BC-2012-00533.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was told upon separating, he could change it to his spouse’s home of record. The applicant’s enlistment agreement reflects Lexington, South Carolina as his home of record at the time of enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03867

    Original file (BC 2012 03867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02520

    Original file (BC 2012 02520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, Southaven, MS is consistently listed throughout his records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01990

    Original file (BC-2012-01990.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01990 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Hawaii. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...