AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01026
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 22 February 2012 be removed
from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His FA scores are incorrect. The PT test administrator marked
his push-ups and sit-ups down in reverse order causing him to
fail. He declined to sign the FA score sheet at the end of the
test and made the administrator aware of the mistake but was told
it was too late to challenge the issue.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
fitness assessment score sheet, fitness screening questionnaire
(FSQ), AF IMT 1168, Statement of Suspect/Witness Complainant.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of staff sergeant.
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows:
DATE
12 February 2010
11 August 2010
28 January 2011
25 July 2011
* 22 February 2012
*Contested FA score.
_________________________________________________________________
SCORE
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial to have the FA dated 22 February
2012 removed from AFFMS.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s
submission, it is our opinion that relief is not warranted in
this case. The applicant's contentions are duly noted; however,
other than his own assertions he has provided no evidence which
sustains his burden of proof of either an error or injustice. In
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
2
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01026 in Executive Session on 20 September 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-01026 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 March 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 April 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012.
3
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00574
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04843
The applicant was put on a medical waiver on 30 August 2012, after his second test, that stated, No time running and no timed walking. IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 3, attachment 13, Any medication that affects the heart rate or the hearts response to exercise may invalidate aerobic components of the FA. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he provided the required documentation to show he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02325
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02325 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 24 April 2012 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04277 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). IAW AFI 36-2905, paragraph 1.20.2.5, FAC documents FA results on a hard copy score sheet, signs the score sheet, and obtains members...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04687
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04687 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment dated 29 Aug 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). She destroyed the official testing score sheet because she was told the test on 29 Aug 12 would not count because of what had happened. She was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03505
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends his abdominal circumference measurements were inconsistent, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates an error or impropriety in the physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05541
Although the applicant is not clear on which FA test he would like removed from his records, we believe based on the Air Force office of primary responsibility review of his record and the AF Form 108 provided by the applicant that reflects his FA dated 15 Mar 12 is, in fact, the assessment he is requesting to be removed. The AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, documenting his limitations and duty exemptions is noted; however, we also note the Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01534
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends updating the push-up component of the applicants fitness assessment to reflect exempt in AFFMS; which would change her overall composite score to 88.33 (Satisfactory). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the applicants request to remove her contested EPR. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02852
The applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 13 March 2012, stating no push-ups. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant requests the entire FA be removed, the AF Form 469 only exempted him from the push-up portion of the FA and not the other components.