Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01113
Original file (BC-2012-01113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01113 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  reentry  (RE)  code  of  2C  which  denotes  “Involuntarily 
separated with an honorable discharge” be changed to a 1A which 
denotes “Ineligible to reenlist, but condition waived,” so that 
he can re-enlist in the military. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was discharged for academic reasons.  He is currently enrolled 
in  a  local  university  and  working  two  jobs.    He  is  highly 
motivated and has a strong will to serve his country. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD  Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty;  pay  stubs  from  his  places  of  employment,  and  his  school 
schedule. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 29 Nov 10, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for 
a period of four years. 
 
On  28  Jul  11,  the  applicant  was  notified  by  his  squadron 
commander  that  he  was  recommending  his  discharge  from  the  Air 
Force  for  unsatisfactory  duty  performance,  specifically,  for 
failure to progress in a required military training program.  The 
reason for the proposed action was the applicant failed his Block 
II, Unit 5 tests on two occasions with scores of 50 percent and 
57  percent  respectively;  the  minimum  passing  score  was 
70 percent.   
 
On  28  Jul  11,  the  applicant  acknowledged  receipt  of  the 
notification  of  discharge  and  waived  his  right  to  consult  legal 
counsel and submit statements in his own behalf.   
 
The  base  legal  office  found  the  case  legally  sufficient  to 
support the separation, and on 5 Aug 11, the discharge authority 
approved the separation and directed an honorable discharge. 
 

On 26 Aug 11, the applicant was honorably discharged by reason of 
unsatisfactory  performance,  and  received  an  RE  code  of  2C.    He 
served on active duty for a period of 8 months and 28 days.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSOA  recommends  denial.    DPSOA  states  the  applicant’s  RE 
code “2C” is correct based on his involuntary separation with an 
honorable  characterization  of  service.    The  applicant  is 
requesting a “1A” RE code; however, AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in 
the United States Air Force, states do not separate members with 
1#  RE  codes  except  1J  “Eligible  to  reenlist,  but  elects 
separation.”  The applicant cannot be awarded a 1J RE code as he 
was  not  selected  or  non-selected  for  reenlistment  under  the 
selective reenlistment program by his commander. 
 
Members who are involuntarily separated from the Air Force with 
an honorable character of service receive an RE code of 2C.  If a 
military recruiter believes he is otherwise eligible a waiver of 
the RE code 2C would be more appropriate. 
 
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 30 May 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date,  a  response  has  not  been  received  by  this  office  (Exhibit 
D). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Should  the 
applicant provide post service evidence, specifically, the grades 
he  has  obtained  while  attending  college  we  would  be  willing  to 
reconsider  his  request.    In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the 
contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief 
sought in this application. 
 
 
 

2

_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  Docket  Number    
BC-2012-01113  in  Executive  Session  on  11  Dec  12,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Mar 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 May 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 
Panel Chair 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04281

    Original file (BC 2014 04281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Sep 12, he was discharged with a RE code of 2C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code to the 1# series. On 25 Sep 12, the 37th Training Group Commander (37 TRG) directed he be discharged with an ELS for “reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force standards of conduct and duty performance.” AFI 36-2606, chapter 5 states not to separate airmen in the RE code 1# series except RE code “1J” which denotes...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04905

    Original file (BC-2012-04905 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSOR recommends that his narrative reason for separation be changed from “Convenience of the Government” to “Unsatisfactory Performance.” The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code to a “1.” DPSOA states that on 28 Aug 2012, his commander approved his involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03239

    Original file (BC 2013 03239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE Code 1 so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military. The only available RE Code a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02475

    Original file (BC-2012-02475.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. He has never done any of the actions he was accused of by the three airmen. Moreover, he has not provided substantial evidence that but for the Article 15 he would have been selected for reenlistment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00582

    Original file (BC 2014 00582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Will be administratively corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an honorable discharge and requests that he be provided more favorable separation and RE codes. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code “2C” is erroneous and will administratively correct his record to reflect RE code “3A” which denotes “First-term Airman [involuntarily separated] {entry level} for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03566

    Original file (BC 2013 03566 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) and the separation code of JHJ be removed or changed. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA notes that although the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00821

    Original file (BC-2011-00821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00821 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant did not provide any supporting evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00485

    Original file (BC-2010-00485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00485 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE code 1C and that she be allowed to return to active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00521

    Original file (BC-2012-00521.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Jun 11, the applicant’s commander notified her of his intent to recommend her discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance, specifically failure to progress in required military training. First, the RE code the applicant requests, R1, does not exist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02383

    Original file (BC-2010-02383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02383 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSOS recommends his records be corrected to reflect "Secretarial Authority" with a separation code of "KFF". _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...