AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01030
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to include award of the Air Force Basic
Military Training Instructor Ribbon (AFBMTIR).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The ribbon was developed and authorized for wear after she
retired.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of AF
Form 1256, Certificate of Training and AF Forms 899; Request and
Authorization for Permanent Change of Station – Military.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served on Active Duty from 6 May 1977 to 30 Sept
1991. She served as a Military Training Instructor (MTI) from
4 Oct 1974 to 15 Dec 1976.
The AFBMTIR was established on 7 Dec 1998. This ribbon is
designed to acknowledge past, present, and future MTIs who
display commitment and dedication to training Air Force
personnel. The ribbon is intended for MTIs, (AFSC 8BOOO), at
Air Force Basic Military Training and Air Force Officer Training
School. Instructors at technical training schools do not
qualify. To be eligible, individuals will need to show proof of
eligibility using the MTI school certificate and documents
showing assignment to MTI duty such as enlisted performance
reports or decorations.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. DPSIDRA states the applicant
was not on Active Duty or in a Reserve component as of the
establishment date, 7 Dec 1998; therefore rendering her
ineligible for retroactive entitlement to the AFBMTIR.
The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 May 2012, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
2
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following members of the Board considered in Docket number
BC-2012-01030 in Executive Session on 23 Aug 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01030:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Mar 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 1 May 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01003
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01003 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Military Training Instructor (MTI) Ribbon be added to his record. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial of the applicant’s request, stating...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01351
There was no service ribbon at the time; however, he would like his records to reflect that he served as an MTI and was awarded the BMTI service ribbon. BMTIs (SDI 8B000) at Air Force BMT and Air Force Officer Training School are eligible, both past and present, if they were on duty on or after 7 Dec 98. The basic award is presented upon graduation from MTI School, and wear of the ribbon becomes permanent after successful completion of at least 12 months tour of duty as an MTI.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04956
On 26 Aug 69, SAF authorized the AFOEA to recognize the achievements and accomplishments of USAF organizations or activities. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the AFOEA, indicating they were unable to verify the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00625
The applicant provided United States Air Force Central (USAFCENT) special order G-00461, dated 9 Oct 09 and contends that her service with the Air Component Coordination Element in Afghanistan (ACCE-A) from 14 Dec 08 to 16 Jun 09, should qualify her for entitlement to the MUA. In response to their request, the applicant only provided page 2 of special order TE-0062. Regarding her request for entitlement to award of the NATO Medal-ISAF, AfgCM, and AFER w/GB, we note the applicant’s DD Form...
When she was subsequently considered in the correct promotion AFSC, 8B000 (Military Training Instructor), she was not selected. According to the Air Force, had she been considered in the MTI career field, she still would not have been selected because her test score was too low. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00187
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The period 30 May 2008 through 14 Oct 2011 is recorded as lost time on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04070
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04070 INDEX CODE: 126.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Applicant did not appeal the Article 15 punishment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00164
She be considered by the Special Selection Board (SSB) for the L0311E (9 Sep 11) Reduction-in-Force Board – administratively corrected. With regard to her contention that the Professional Military Education (PME) push line does not show that she completed PDE prior to the RIF Board convening date, DPSID states the senior rater who completed the RRF included accurate information at the time he signed the RRF. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01110
The Air Force repays the lesser amount of one- third or $3333.33, per year of outstanding qualifying student loans. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01110 in Executive Session on 15 April 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01110
The Air Force repays the lesser amount of one- third or $3333.33, per year of outstanding qualifying student loans. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01110 in Executive Session on 15 April 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated...