Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01093
Original file (BC-2012-01093.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01093 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
    
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember's Group Life Insurance 
(FSGLI) for the period of 1 Aug 11 thru 30 Nov 11. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His military pay was terminated on 31 Jul 11 due to an error in 
processing his enlistment extension paperwork.  When he requested 
correction to his records, the system automatically enrolled his 
wife into the FSGLI. 
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  an  e-mail 
communication and a copy of his Leave and Earning Statement on-
Line Inquiry System printout.  
 
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force on 1 Jan 12 in 
the grade of senior master sergeant.  
 
FSGLI  was  implemented  on  1  Nov  01  and  made  it  possible  for 
servicemembers to take out low cost insurance on their spouse for 
up to $100,000.00 (charged a premium) and $10,0-00.00 (no charge) 
life  insurance  for  dependent  children  through  the  Office  of 
Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance.    The  law  mandated  that 
coverage for spouses and dependent children automatically go into 
effect on the date of implementation so long as the member was 
insured under the SGLI program. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPWC  recommends  approving  the  applicant’s  request  for 
reimbursement for all premiums paid in the amount of $100.00 as a 
result  of  the  enlistment  extension  being  processed  improperly.  
 
 

Further,  although  there  is  no  FSGLI  declination  on  file,  his 
marriage  was  properly  updated  in  the  Defense  Enrollment 
Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) which means that his FSGLI 
coverage  would  have  automatically  began  when  the  program  was 
established.  Therefore, they find it reasonable to assume that 
the applicant declined coverage after the program started. 
 
The complete DPWD evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 11 May 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, we concur 
with  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  opinion  and 
recommendation  that  it  appears  reasonable  to  believe  that  the 
applicant  declined  FSGLI  coverage  at  the  time  the  program  was 
established  otherwise  the  premiums  would  have  automatically  been 
deducted from his retired pay.  In view of this and the fact that 
the  applicant’s  enlistment  extension  was  improperly  executed,  we 
find in the applicant’s favor to unenroll his spouse in the FSGLI 
program and reimburse him of all premiums paid for FSGLI coverage.  
Therefore, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated 
below. 
 
______________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he filed a Family 
Coverage  Election,  SGLV  –  8286A  on  1  August  2011,  declining 
coverage  for  his  spouse  and  is  authorized  reimbursement  of  the 
overcharged premiums from 1 August 2011 to 30 November 2011. 
 
______________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2012-01093  in  Executive  Session  on  6  Dec  12,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPWC, dated 24 Apr 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 
 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00988

    Original file (BC-2008-00988.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPWC recommends denial of the applicant's request for reimbursement of FSGLI premiums from 1 Oct 06 through 31 Dec 07. The applicant did not report her marriage until Dec 07 (14 months later), and is, therefore, responsible for the FSGLI premiums for that period of time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | bc-2003-01378

    Original file (bc-2003-01378.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. However, as of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-01378 in Executive Session on 2 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00179

    Original file (BC-2003-00179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00179 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01641

    Original file (BC 2014 01641 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01641 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive reimbursement for the Family Member Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted during the period 1 Mar 11 – 1 Apr 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03316

    Original file (bc-2003-03316.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. In September 2003, he completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to decline FSGLI coverage for his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-03316 in Executive Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03546

    Original file (BC-2002-03546.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. On 31 October 2002, the applicant completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to decline FSGLI coverage for her spouse. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00176

    Original file (BC-2003-00176.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00176 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03487

    Original file (BC-2005-03487.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note that Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. On 19 May 2005, she again declined FSGLI coverage and has been refunded the premiums from June 2005 through October 2005. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03584

    Original file (BC-2002-03584.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14, established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant’s June 2001...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02897

    Original file (BC-2002-02897.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied, and states in part, that there is no evidence that an injustice occurred. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02897...